RE: breaking-the-un-concludes-that-israel-has-established-an-apartheid-regime
⁜→ P F Tinmore, rylah,
et al,
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon’s remarks are a political recognition, expressed in diplomatic language, that in the matter of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, there is a clear set of conditions within the UN that compromises its abilities to be of any value in the development of a solution.
The biased "report" bashing Israel was removed almost 2 years ago,
no wonder it was tailored by a bunch of Muslim countries where public execution of gays, slavery, and rape are a cultural norm and law.
For real Apartheid look no further than those Muslim counties who smear Israel.
Does he mean the role the UN has had for 70 years? I don't see any "effectively" here.
(COMMENT)
The UN attempted to bring peace between the principal parties to the conflict. And it accomplished that objective...
• Syria is a failed state; and as such, can not be trusted to render non-biased assistance in the name of peace.
• Lebanon is a brokered peace that was renewed on 2000.
• Both Jordan and Egypt have established Peace Treaties.
The regional stability is unbalanced. The external cause for the destabilization of security and the prevention for the re-establishment of peace originated from quasi-state supported, asymmetric, adverse influences that degenerated into the worst form of terrorism.
In the case of this region, the international laws and methods of diplomacy have been not advanced comprehensive protocols to deal with these new state actors.
Most Respectfully,
R