BREAKING! The Florida Grand Jury Was Never Told About 'The Presidential Records Act' Or The 'Clinton Socks Case', Both Exonerating!

[Independent thinker]

Bill Clinton says "Hi".

WW

I'm not exactly sure what that is supposed to mean but about the best take on it is that you are admitting government has been weaponized against Trump as paybacks for Clinton.

 

[Billiejeens]

It's getting really tiresome listening to tards who have not read the indictment parrot propaganda.

Especially propaganda by the criminal himself.

This is willful blindness, not reading the indictment.

You have already proven that you don't know what an indictment actually is.

 

[Billiejeens]

Oh silly one, I'd put me against you on knowledge any day of the week and twice on Sunday!

That's funny.

 

[Toro]

The prosecution puts on the case before the grand jury. The defense never addresses anything. No exonerating evidence is presented. Hearsay is permitted. There is no cross examination. The defendant is not permitted counsel. It's a prosecution shit show.

They’re looking for lawyers because they can’t find any. Wait long enough and you’ll get a call. But make sure you yourself have good representation when you are inevitably quizzed by the DOJ for Trump asking you to assist in his illegal activities.

 

[The Duke]

Merrill is correct. The classified top secret, and secret files and National Defence documents, that Trump took with him as he exited, were never president Trump's personal property to take.

They were in his possession, and possession is 9/10 of the law.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

"By the looks of you"? What does that even mean?

You are a very sturdy woman with a low center of gravity.

What did you think it meant?

 

[Toro]

Karl Rove Blames Trump’s ‘Reckless Petulance’ For Indictment, Argues ‘Any Staffer Found Guilty’ Would Go To Prison For Same Behavior

“Any staffer found guilty of doing that would go to prison for breaking the laws protecting the nation’s secrets, as Mr. Trump is now charged,” Rove argued

t.co

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Do you love him?
If he is too old for you
Do you love his son?

Do not even know him, never think about him at all except when you all bring him up.

 

[Billiejeens]

Do not even know him, never think about him at all except when you all bring him up.

They are rich
You all could be very happy together.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

They are rich
You all could be very happy together.

You are just odd some days.

 

[Billiejeens]

You are just odd some days.

Thank you.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They’re looking for lawyers because they can’t find any. Wait long enough and you’ll get a call. But make sure you yourself have good representation when you are inevitably quizzed by the DOJ for Trump asking you to assist in his illegal activities.

Of COURSE. Trump lawyers are being threatened by the DOJ. It is to be expected. Once political arrests are made, the very next step is prosecuting the lawyers.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[LeroyDumonde]

If you can "indict a ham sandwich"....why didn't the trump Justice Dept. indict Hillary Clinton when they had four years to do so?

Because Trump was dumb enough to staff it with swamp rats.

 

[Lesh]

He had every right to those documents.

Based on what? He was at that point an ordinary citizen. Do you think you have a right to national security docs?

 

[Billiejeens]

Way undercharged.

 

[Care4all]

1. Trump is saying that the PRA governs the handling of documents. ALL doc1. Where did Trump get that total nonsense from?uments. So there are no "crimes".

2. AG Whitaker re-read the PRA and confirmed that it covers all documents without exception.

3. The court case will determine which law governs, the PRA or the EA, stay tuned, the judge may throw the case out and say that the PRA governs, or if the EA governs the appeals may go up to the USSC for a determination. Please remember that precedent using Bill Clinton's "sock drawer tapes" says that if the ex-president has them they are his personal property.

1 nonsense!

2 more nonsense

3. More nonsense. The PRA is not criminal law, it can not usurp the Espionage act, which deals with top secret, secret, and national defense documents.


the PRA covers presidential and VP records of which ALL GOVT RECORDS goes to NARA as he exists THE white house, Only personal belongs can be brought with Trump.

The PRA has never governed top secret classified or National defense documents. Those are not presidential records of any kind....let alone Trump's personal records.

The rules are spelled out clearly in the PRA, defining govt records vs personal records.....

The tapings that Clinton and his autobiography writer did, were personal records according to the court.

How anyone can think Trump could take national defense and top secret documents of OUR GOVERNMENT, and claim they were personal records that he could take with him.... is off their rocker!

 

[Blaster]

Based on what? He was at that point an ordinary citizen. Do you think you have a right to national security docs?

If he was an ordinary citizen at that point then how did congress impeach him?

 

[Lesh]

If he was an ordinary citizen at that point then how did congress impeach him?

What? He took and refused to return those docs well after he was impeached.

How ******* stupid are you?

 

[Blaster]

What? He took and refused to return those docs well after he was impeached.

How ******* stupid are you?

They impeached him after he left office. Are you really that obtuse?