BREAKING: Texts and Emails Indicate Hillary Clinton Campaign Directly Coordinated with Obama White House to Launch Trump-Russia Hoax

[struth]

And? You guys don't even know what crimes they're supposed to be presenting evidence for.

Hahab well no shit, the grand jury determines the crimes after hearing the evidence

Only fascist states like xiden’s regime and national socialist Germany present the crime first

 

[Delldude]

This is good. The testimony will speak for itself and expose the foolishness of this whole charade.

You can make paper airplanes out of house subpoenas.

Rubber meets the road when DOJ sends greetings.

 

[BackAgain]

Already was a ruling.

I did not see it. Link? And, if so, will it be delayed via an appeal?

I’m interested in seeing those minutes. But I also see a reason for patience.

I don’t want anything done now IF it later impedes that ability of the government to prosecute the offenders.

 

[Delldude]

I did not see it. Link? And, if so, will it be delayed via an appeal?

I’m interested in seeing those minutes. But I also see a reason for patience.

I don’t want anything done now IF it later impedes that ability of the government to prosecute the offenders.

I saw something about wanting Maxwells opinion on releasing them but what bearing would she have on GJ transcripts,?

Judge declines to release grand jury documents from the criminal probe into Jeffrey Epstein | CNN Politics

https://share.google/ZdaKCd9SIkYFV7nvc

 

[MagicMike]

You can make paper airplanes out of house subpoenas.

Rubber meets the road when DOJ sends greetings.

It is Trump's DOJ so it's just a political persecution witch hunt.

 

[Delldude]

It is Trump's DOJ so it's just a political persecution witch hunt.

Like Russia Russia Russia or the pee pee tapes or Stormy or the failed impeachments or Letitia or Fannie or Alvin?

LOL

 

[MagicMike]

Like Russia Russia Russia or the pee pee tapes or Stormy or the failed impeachments or Letitia or Fannie or Alvin?

LOL

No, different.

 

[Delldude]

No, different.

Dems do it....it's ok.

 

[MagicMike]

Dems do it....it's ok.

Do you EVER stop with the whataboutism? It is never a valid argument...always comparing things and considering them the same.

 

[Delldude]

Do you EVER stop with the whataboutism? It is never a valid argument...always comparing things and considering them the same.

So it's ok when you clowns do it but when we do and cite what was done previously, it's off limits?
Constitution was violated, conspiracies happened by those in government we trusted.
People need to be held accountable for their misdeeds.

FAFO

 

[MagicMike]

So it's ok when you clowns do it but when we do and cite what was done previously, it's off limits?
Constitution was violated, conspiracies happened by those in government we trusted.
People need to be held accountable for their misdeeds.

FAFO

In the first place the entire premise of this thread is bullshit. There was never any "Trump Russia hoax." There was only a legitimate investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election at the same time Trump was lying about not having the contacts and business dealings with Russia that he was trying to keep secret.
So no, that LEGITIMATE and legal investigation doesn't share any "sameness" with Trump's bananna republic, political persecution going on now.

 

[Delldude]

There was only a legitimate investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election at the same time Trump was lying about not having the contacts and business dealings with Russia that he was trying to keep secret.

Not sure where you've been, the Mueller report proved that wrong.

Second, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities. We did not address collusion, which is not a legal term; rather we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy, and there was not.

There was never any "Trump Russia hoax.

The recent release of declassified documents and criminal referrals to DOJ and recent news of empaneling a GJ, has proven that to to be BS.

So no, that LEGITIMATE and legal investigation doesn't share any "sameness" with Trump's bananna republic, political persecution going on now.

You mean that 'legitimate and legal investigation' that was found to have used corrupt intel to please Obama?

 

[MagicMike]

Not sure where you've been, the Mueller report proved that wrong.

Second, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities. We did not address collusion, which is not a legal term; rather we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy, and there was not.

And nobody was charged

The recent release of declassified documents and criminal referrals to DOJ and recent news of empaneling a GJ, has proven that to to be BS.

How about a link to the document you are referring to, otherwise you are just quoting something you've heard from somebody else.

You mean that 'legitimate and legal investigation' that was found to have used corrupt intel to please Obama?

Quote talking points much?
Show me the "corrupt intel."
You cannot. Know why?
Because it doesn't exist. This "corruption investigation" is just another distraction to keep you MAGAts waiting breathlessly (again) for the next few months for another thing that's not even going to materialize.
Then, once again, just like with the Epstein files, the moment you all stsrt to grumble about being misled and played for fools he'll break out some new, shiny object to divert your attention from this manufactured non-scandal and continue gaslighting you all into feeling foolish for continuing to talki about the last one when he's got a new outrage for you.
Rinse and repeat.
How many times are you simpletons going to fall for the same ruse Delldud?

 

[Delldude]

And nobody was charged

Not for anything regarding 'conspiring with the Russians'.

How about a link to the document you are referring to, otherwise you are just quoting something you've heard from somebody else.

Try looking in the thread 'BreakingNI Tulsi Gabbard' or something like that. Everything you don't want find out about is in that thread including links to the sources.

Show me the "corrupt intel."
You cannot. Know why?
Because it doesn't exist.

Whatever you don't go to that thread......you might not be able to handle the truth.

Quote talking points much?

Ha ha ha ha....don't need hem, especially for smacks like you.

 

[MagicMike]

Not for anything regarding 'conspiring with the Russians'.



Try looking in the thread 'BreakingNI Tulsi Gabbard' or something like that. Everything you don't want find out about is in that thread including links to the sources.



Whatever you don't go to that thread......you might not be able to handle the truth.



Ha ha ha ha....don't need hem, especially for smacks like you.

Here you are again just parroting what your echo chamber cult propaganda tells you.
As usual you're not really sure where to actually find the information you are trying to act informed about.
Cultists gotta cult huh?

 

[Delldude]

Here you are again just parroting what your echo chamber cult propaganda tells you.
As usual you're not really sure where to actually find the information you are trying to act informed about.
Cultists gotta cult huh?

Go look where I told you.

So you made an asshole out of yourself two days in a row....... you're the gift that keeps on giving......

 

[MagicMike]

Go look where I told you.

So you made an asshole out of yourself two days in a row....... you're the gift that keeps on giving......

View attachment 1145413

This is your idea of citing information Delldud:

"Try looking in the thread 'BreakingNI Tulsi Gabbard' or something like that."

Lmao!
Appears that YOU'RE the asshole here.

 

[Delldude]

Try looking in the thread 'BreakingNI Tulsi Gabbard' or something like that."

BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump

 

[MagicMike]

BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump

View attachment 1145476

I just scrolled back through 3 days of political threads looking for your title above.
How many fricking days do I have to go back to find it, and WHY is is MY job to have to find YOUR information to back up your claim?
You go find it and provide it.
Where is this declassified intel you claim you've seen?
I'll wait.

 

[Delldude]

I just scrolled back through 3 days of political threads looking for your title above.
How many fricking days do I have to go back to find it, and WHY is is MY job to have to find YOUR information to back up your claim?
You go find it and provide it.
Where is this declassified intel you claim you've seen?
I'll wait.

**** you......you always slip out the door when asked for sources.

Cut and paste this in the search box you *****:

HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard