BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

[bigrebnc1775]

False, as always. You don't even know what year that election was that you're trying to make a point from. It wasn't 1886 or 1888. It was 1876 and unlike 2020, only slates certified by a state are legitimate electors.

Same as in 1960. Republican electors were certified by the state until after a recount showed JFK actually won Hawaii, the governor rescinded the republican slate and certified the democratic slate.

The fake electors were sent by Kennedy from Hawaii. Do keep up.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

View attachment 970534

you just described project 2025

The here and now should be your concern. But tit for tat will happen.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Haha, thanks for doing my light work.

I love a good assistant. .

Proving you wrong is what I do

 

[playtime]

The fake electors were sent by Kennedy from Hawaii. Do keep up.

Republicans are trying to take the Trump fake electors narrative and tie it to Democrats​

Sudiksha Kochi
USA TODAY
Sept. 2023

But some conservatives argue that Democrats deployed a similar tactic in Hawaii during the 1960 election between then Vice President Richard Nixon and Democratic challenger John F. Kennedy - a comparison that holds no water.

Though Kennedy beat Nixon in the 1960 election, Hawaii’s results remained largely uncertain since the initial count found that Nixon beat Kennedy in the state by less than 150 votes - a narrow margin that was originally certified by the Hawaii's Republican lieutenant governor.

A lawsuit was soon filed and a court ordered a recount of votes in the state, which was still taking place on Dec. 19, 1960 - the date set for electors to meet and cast their ballots. On that day, Republican electors sent a certificate to Congress with their three votes for Nixon.

But at the same time, Democrat electors cast their three votes for Kennedy and sent their own documents to Congress. The recount found that Kennedy won Hawaii by 115 votes and a court ordered his win to be certified, according to Joan Meyer, a partner at the law firm Thompson Hine.
But the 1960 case and what happened in the aftermath of 2020 are noticeably different.

“In Trump's case there were no genuine grounds for uncertainty about the outcome of the election, no ongoing recount, and Trump's slates of fake electors were assembled with the intent to sow confusion, buffalo Congress and the Vice President, and stop them from certifying the genuine election results,” said David Alan Sklansky, a law professor at Stanford University...
Republicans are trying to take the Trump fake electors narrative and tie it to Democrats

 

[playtime]

The here and now should be your concern. But tit for tat will happen.

you believe lies & will think like a puppet.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The fake electors were sent by Kennedy from Hawaii. Do keep up.

There were no fake electors sent by Hawaii. Try to keep up.

in 1960 Hawaii was conducting it's first Presidential election and they were under a Court supervised recourt. It was the Governor under Court Supervision that designated the two slates of elections. The recount was complete and the official one sent to Congress for counting.

This is no where near the same situation with Trump's fake elector plan as:

• Recounts were complete.
• Court cases were complete.
• The States Executive Authority (Governor or State Secretary of State) had certified the official slate of Electoral College Electors.
• The fake electors were chosen by the party machinery to complete fraudulent certifications and they were NOT submitted under State Executive Authority in accordance with the State law's established by the State Legislature.

Try to sell equating 1960 to 2020 to someone else.

(After posting the truth, fell free to add a thumbs down or fake news flag, but that still wont change reality.)

WW

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Using his agencies to go after anyone who doesn't agree with him.

Like hunter Biden.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Proving you wrong is what I do

No, you fell on your face and proved me right.

And it was hilarious.

Everyine saw it.

 

[tahuyaman]

You forgot to name a law under which Biden could be charged.

I don't think you get how this works. People don't get indicted by grand juries just because you have a sad and disagree with a policy.

For contrast, look how easy it is to list the laws that Trump broke.

Do you want title and verse you dumb ******?

 

[Care4all]

As noted Obama assassinated al-Awlaki and got away with it.

He checked with white house legal advisors first. They explained to him and told him, that it was legal.... He has that in writing, and was what he made his decision to ok the military to do so.

Was the legal advice wrong? Maybe.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you want title and verse you dumb ******?

Did I stutter, crybaby?

 

[Marener]

Using his agencies to go after anyone who doesn't agree with him.

Totally legal. SCOTUS said so.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Using his agencies to go after anyone who doesn't agree with him.

Cult delusion. That's the point of a special prosecutor.

 

[airplanemechanic]

In these cases, such is not required. If noncombatants hunker with enemy combatants, they yield their shield. Tough, bubby.

Using drones to kill Americans overseas could very easily be seen as a war crime. I don't care what circumstances their are.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Using drones to kill Americans overseas could very easily be seen as a war crime. I don't care what circumstances their are.

Then why doesn't anyone who
Matters see it that way?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Then why doesn't anyone who
Matters see it that way?

Indeed, the casualties were bedded down with war criminals.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There were no fake electors sent by Hawaii. Try to keep up.

in 1960 Hawaii was conducting it's first Presidential election and they were under a Court supervised recourt. It was the Governor under Court Supervision that designated the two slates of elections. The recount was complete and the official one sent to Congress for counting.

This is no where near the same situation with Trump's fake elector plan as:

• Recounts were complete.
• Court cases were complete.
• The States Executive Authority (Governor or State Secretary of State) had certified the official slate of Electoral College Electors.
• The fake electors were chosen by the party machinery to complete fraudulent certifications and they were NOT submitted under State Executive Authority in accordance with the State law's established by the State Legislature.

Try to sell equating 1960 to 2020 to someone else.

(After posting the truth, fell free to add a thumbs down or fake news flag, but that still wont change reality.)

WW

Fake electors were sent from Hawaii?
Kennedy was disputing the election results?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Then why doesn't anyone who
Matters see it that way?

Because it was the chosen one

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Totally legal. SCOTUS said so.

No it's not legal but let's go with its legal when trump is president.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Republicans are trying to take the Trump fake electors narrative and tie it to Democrats​

Sudiksha Kochi
USA TODAY
Sept. 2023

But some conservatives argue that Democrats deployed a similar tactic in Hawaii during the 1960 election between then Vice President Richard Nixon and Democratic challenger John F. Kennedy - a comparison that holds no water.

Though Kennedy beat Nixon in the 1960 election, Hawaii’s results remained largely uncertain since the initial count found that Nixon beat Kennedy in the state by less than 150 votes - a narrow margin that was originally certified by the Hawaii's Republican lieutenant governor.

A lawsuit was soon filed and a court ordered a recount of votes in the state, which was still taking place on Dec. 19, 1960 - the date set for electors to meet and cast their ballots. On that day, Republican electors sent a certificate to Congress with their three votes for Nixon.

But at the same time, Democrat electors cast their three votes for Kennedy and sent their own documents to Congress. The recount found that Kennedy won Hawaii by 115 votes and a court ordered his win to be certified, according to Joan Meyer, a partner at the law firm Thompson Hine.
But the 1960 case and what happened in the aftermath of 2020 are noticeably different.

“In Trump's case there were no genuine grounds for uncertainty about the outcome of the election, no ongoing recount, and Trump's slates of fake electors were assembled with the intent to sow confusion, buffalo Congress and the Vice President, and stop them from certifying the genuine election results,” said David Alan Sklansky, a law professor at Stanford University...
Republicans are trying to take the Trump fake electors narrative and tie it to Democrats

Kennedy was a democrat and Hawaii has always been a democrat shit hole. 2+2=4