BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

[TemplarKormac]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

 

[TemplarKormac]

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

Moreover... you cut the legs out from under your own premise by citing this quote.

Either there was evidence, provable evidence, or there wasn't. You cannot make baseless claims and prove them with baseless evidence.

The OP had NO evidence, so I need no evidence to dismiss it, and YOU.

Then you are intellectually dishonest, ergo intellectually weak.

There is no evidence because you don't want there to be. You won't even look to corroborate or debunk facts and positions as they are presented.

Consider yourself exposed for the intellectual lightweight you are.

 

[edthecynic]

I notice you could not provide a single quote from the letter to back up the poster's LIE.
No surprise there!!!!

Hey Jackass..

We noticed you tards are guilty and full of shit...

Barr is going to burn your ass.....

Again you haven't been able to cite a single word from the letter to support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Again....

You have been proven to be full of shit.....

If that lie was true you could quote the words that back up the poster's lie.
If you notice he gave up when challenged, but you are too STUPID to realize you are proving my point with each post where you fail to cite the exact words from the Mueller letter that support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Try and prove it's not true Tard...….

You can't...

I already did,
I posted the actual Mueller letter and there was nothing in even remotely like what the poster claimed was in the last 2 paragraphs. That is why you lying scum assholes have not beed able to cite Mueller's EXACT words from the letter.

 

[TemplarKormac]

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

Moreover... you cut the legs out from under your own premise by citing this quote.

Either there was evidence, provable evidence, or there wasn't. You cannot make baseless claims and prove them with baseless evidence.

The OP had NO evidence, so I need no evidence to dismiss it, and YOU.

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Hey Jackass..

We noticed you tards are guilty and full of shit...

Barr is going to burn your ass.....

Again you haven't been able to cite a single word from the letter to support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Again....

You have been proven to be full of shit.....

If that lie was true you could quote the words that back up the poster's lie.
If you notice he gave up when challenged, but you are too STUPID to realize you are proving my point with each post where you fail to cite the exact words from the Mueller letter that support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Try and prove it's not true Tard...….

You can't...

I already did,
I posted the actual Mueller letter and there was nothing in even remotely like what the poster claimed was in the last 2 paragraphs. That is why you lying scum assholes have not beed able to cite Mueller's EXACT words from the letter.

Sure, the report was over 400 pages long.

Please don't lie. A partisan nitwit like you couldn't make it past the first paragraph of a news article much less a 400 page special counsel report on Russian interference and collusion.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

 

[edthecynic]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

 

[edthecynic]

Again you haven't been able to cite a single word from the letter to support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Again....

You have been proven to be full of shit.....

If that lie was true you could quote the words that back up the poster's lie.
If you notice he gave up when challenged, but you are too STUPID to realize you are proving my point with each post where you fail to cite the exact words from the Mueller letter that support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Try and prove it's not true Tard...….

You can't...

I already did,
I posted the actual Mueller letter and there was nothing in even remotely like what the poster claimed was in the last 2 paragraphs. That is why you lying scum assholes have not beed able to cite Mueller's EXACT words from the letter.

Sure, the report was over 400 pages long.

Please don't lie. A partisan nitwit like you couldn't make it past the first paragraph of a news article much less a 400 page special counsel report on Russian interference and collusion.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Hey the report was 400 pages, not Mueller's letter to the lying scum POS Barr, and it is the LETTER we are discussing.

Notice what the worthless lying scum Right do when they know they have been caught lying, they play dumb and pretend they were discussing something different to try to divert the thread.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

No, Mueller is the source. The very same Mueller you praised not long ago.

Shocking, isn't it?

Curious, how many times can we possibly split a hair?

 

[edthecynic]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

No, Mueller is the source. The very same Mueller you praised not long ago.

Shocking, isn't it?

Curious, how many times can we possibly split a hair?

LIAR!
It says right in YOUR link from the third post, "a spokesman for the special council declined to comment."
And the OP's twitter link links to to his OWN article in the One America Network of lies.
Neither source has any quote from Mueller.
Can't you worthless lying scum ever stop lying?????

 

[TemplarKormac]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

Curious...

What was Barr lying about exactly? Can you prove to me the 4 page letter he sent to Congress was an attempt to mislead them (that in and of itself purjury)? Can you make a case to try and convict Barr for the crime of lying to Congress?

You can't, can you?

 

[WEATHER53]

As this settles in this is more media lying to incite more liberal emotional derangement
In capsule—Mueller writes Barr that Mueller feels the media is not correctly handling the nuances of Muellers report based on the media’s commentary of Barr’s report. Barr asks if Mueller thinks that Barr provided information counter to Muellers report and Mueller says no.
That’s light years from what the MSM put out and has unleashed more liberal dementia.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

No, Mueller is the source. The very same Mueller you praised not long ago.

Shocking, isn't it?

Curious, how many times can we possibly split a hair?

LIAR!
It says right in YOUR link from the third post, "a spokesman for the special council declined to comment."
And the OP's twitter link links to to his OWN article in the One America Network of lies.
Neither source has any quote from Mueller.
Can't you worthless lying scum ever stop lying?????

So, are you denying that Mueller ever wrote the letter to Barr expressing concerns over the initial release of the report?

Because the preceding paragraph states as quoted DIRECTLY from the letter:

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

Did he or did he not say that?

Or are you discrediting Mueller as a source because he was in turn cited by a right wing news source and in turn by a right wing member of this board?

You funny. Oh man, you funny.

 

[edthecynic]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

Curious...

What was Barr lying about exactly? Can you prove to me the 4 page letter he sent to Congress was an attempt to mislead them (that in and of itself purjury)? Can you make a case to try and convict Barr for the crime of lying to Congress?

You can't, can you?

Barr's lies to congress have been heavily reported. Try doing some research on your own, and stop trying to divert from the fact that the OP had NO source for his made up claims other than his own fertile imagination.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Also, in that letter, where does it state Barr outright lied about the report?

Is there a quote or footnote I'm missing? A fifth page?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

Curious...

What was Barr lying about exactly? Can you prove to me the 4 page letter he sent to Congress was an attempt to mislead them (that in and of itself purjury)? Can you make a case to try and convict Barr for the crime of lying to Congress?

You can't, can you?

Barr's lies to congress have been heavily reported. Try doing some research on your own, and stop trying to divert from the fact that the OP had NO source for his made up claims other than his own fertile imagination.

I'll ask you again, what was Barr lying about? What are the lies he told in specific? I am genuinely curious. Because if he's a pathological liar, he needs to be removed from his post.

Hop to, Ed.

 

[edthecynic]

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

No, Mueller is the source. The very same Mueller you praised not long ago.

Shocking, isn't it?

Curious, how many times can we possibly split a hair?

LIAR!
It says right in YOUR link from the third post, "a spokesman for the special council declined to comment."
And the OP's twitter link links to to his OWN article in the One America Network of lies.
Neither source has any quote from Mueller.
Can't you worthless lying scum ever stop lying?????

So, are you denying that Mueller ever wrote the letter to Barr expressing concerns over the initial release of the report?

Because the preceding paragraph states as quoted DIRECTLY from the letter:

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

Did he or did he not say that?

Or are you discrediting Mueller as a source because he was in turn cited by a right wing news source and in turn by a right wing member of this board?

You funny. Oh man, you funny.

Man you are desperate!
Mueller did NOT express concerns about "the initial release of the report" because the report had not been released yet. But nice try at misrepresenting Mueller's letter to Barr about BARR's summary misrepresenting his report. And Mueller says it plainly in the part of the letter you cited, "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions."

 

[edthecynic]

Cite the name of the PO's source!

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

Curious...

What was Barr lying about exactly? Can you prove to me the 4 page letter he sent to Congress was an attempt to mislead them (that in and of itself purjury)? Can you make a case to try and convict Barr for the crime of lying to Congress?

You can't, can you?

Barr's lies to congress have been heavily reported. Try doing some research on your own, and stop trying to divert from the fact that the OP had NO source for his made up claims other than his own fertile imagination.

I'll ask you again, what was Barr lying about? What are the lies he told in specific? I am genuinely curious. Because if he's a pathological liar, he needs to be removed from his post.

Hop to, Ed.

Ask all you want, you already know what Barr got CAUGHT lying about. I will not let you divert this thread.

 

[edthecynic]

Also, in that letter, where does it state Barr outright lied about the report?

Is there a quote or footnote I'm missing? A fifth page?

Nice try at diversion, please continue to debate yourself with your own lies.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Posobiec? What a name.

Anyhow perhaps you might want to read the third post in this thread.

BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

Or does WaPo and NYT not count?

Hey pinhead, those clips are citing Barr's lies and NOT quotes from Mueller, but you knew that already.
The OP simply cited HIMSELF as the "source" of his BULLSHIT, and you knew that already, also!

No, Mueller is the source. The very same Mueller you praised not long ago.

Shocking, isn't it?

Curious, how many times can we possibly split a hair?

LIAR!
It says right in YOUR link from the third post, "a spokesman for the special council declined to comment."
And the OP's twitter link links to to his OWN article in the One America Network of lies.
Neither source has any quote from Mueller.
Can't you worthless lying scum ever stop lying?????

So, are you denying that Mueller ever wrote the letter to Barr expressing concerns over the initial release of the report?

Because the preceding paragraph states as quoted DIRECTLY from the letter:

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

Did he or did he not say that?

Or are you discrediting Mueller as a source because he was in turn cited by a right wing news source and in turn by a right wing member of this board?

You funny. Oh man, you funny.

Man you are desperate!
Mueller did NOT express concerns about "the initial release of the report" because the report had not been released yet. But nice try at misrepresenting Mueller's letter to Barr about BARR's summary misrepresenting his report. And Mueller says it plainly in the part of the letter you cited, "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions."

"Mueller did NOT express concerns about "the initial release of the report" because the report had not been released yet"

Huh? Are you rage typing now? Oh, yeah, I can see the big bold underlined sentences now.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Also, in that letter, where does it state Barr outright lied about the report?

Is there a quote or footnote I'm missing? A fifth page?

Nice try at diversion, please continue to debate yourself with your own lies.

Again, what are the lies? Why can't you tell anyone what the lies are?

Or are you just content on screaming and stomping like a pre-pubescent child?