all hearsay, the only hard evidence, the yearbook, has been proven to be a forgery.
The yearbook is (a) not the issue... signing a yearbook is not criminal or even questionable; and (b) has not been proven a forgery. Go ahead, prove me wrong on either count.
In the USA we do not convict people based on hearsay, the media, or public opinion.
Again, there is no "conviction" involved here. There is no "arrest" or "indictment" either. That too is not the issue. Again, deflection attempt fails.
Prove that he did these things and I will be right there with you pushing him behind bars, but until then--------------------------------------------
Which one is "he"?
These are personal-life issues. They're not my concern. And this just in --- if you look around you'll see Louisiana. That means it's not yours either.
"he" is anyone convicted of sexual harassment, any party.
My error, I was confusing this thread with one where I pointed out that Rump did exactly the same thing as Franken, and yet no calls for Rump to resign over it.
Lotta shit going on, it's hard to keep up.
What I am objecting to here is destroying someone by allegations with no proof. There was proof of Clinton's perversions, Franken admitted to his, plus pictures. There is nothing on moore but hearsay. He may have been a slimeball, but there is no proof.
Interesting that women telling their stories is interpreted as "destroying someone".
It's a ******* election. In an election, voters want to know who the candidates are. That election is, once again, the decision of the voters of the state of Alabama.
"Proof" would be required for an
indictment.
"Crime" - "Election". Know the difference.
You got "proof" of Hillary's Parkinson's Disease? Got "proof" of O'bama being born in Kenya? Got "proof" of John McCain "fathering an illegitimate black child"?
OK then.