Breaking! Republicans Find Text and Email Evidence that Pelosi Secretly DECREASED Security at US Capitol for Jan 6

[XponentialChaos]

It hasn't been proven that is was free and fair. Therefore it isn't a fact that the 2020 election was free and fair.

Those goal posts look heavy.

You claimed it to be a fact that the 2020 election was stolen. Even your fellow Trumpster says that hasn’t been proven.

Whoops! Looks like you’re full of shit.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It was a setup, you despicable douchebag.

You're arguing more police would have been there and shot them up Kent State style? I agree.

 

[Lesh]

It hasn't been proven that is was free and fair. Therefore it isn't a fact that the 2020 election was free and fair.

It doesn’t work that way dumbshit

 

[Leviticus]

What day did Donald Trump offer 10,000 troops, to Nancy, and was the Capitol Police and sergeant of Arms told that Trump wanted or ordered 10,000 national guard troops?

What day were the emails from Pelosi's staffers?

Did Trump offer the troops before or after these emails?

Did Trump tell Pelosi, and the sergeant of arms, and the Capitol Police and the DC mayor....

that Trump was going to send the protesters at his Rally on the Ellipse two miles away, to March down to the Capitol on the 6th....? Did he get a permit for the March from Park Police?

Did they know Trump was going to do that, or did Trump purposely keep that tidbit of pertinent information from them, as an element of surprise?

Trump never offered troops. Trump claimed that he sent orders to the DC National Guard to have troops ready to move in if they were needed, and that Palosi refused to allow them into the capital even AFTER the riots began. The commanding officer of the DC national guard said that Trump never gave any such orders, and said that he was not aware of any offer of providing added security.
In fact, he said that he wasn't able to even get ahold of Trump, or anyone else who had the legal authority to authorize emergancy deployment during the riot itself. Mike Pence had to break the chain of command and order the National Guard in himself.

 

[scruffy]

It doesn’t work that way dumbshit

Yes actually it does, silly leftard.

WTF is the matter with you asswipes?

A secure system doesn't get that way unless it's proven to be secure. Double fuckin duh.

This current system is provably INsecure. Not one of you shit for brains leftards has ever even suggested testing the system. That's because you have shit for brains.

 

[Care4all]

Yes actually it does, silly leftard.

WTF is the matter with you asswipes?

A secure system doesn't get that way unless it's proven to be secure. Double fuckin duh.

This current system is provably INsecure. Not one of you shit for brains leftards has ever even suggested testing the system. That's because you have shit for brains.

Are you implying that the system in every voting district is not tested before every election?

 

[scruffy]

Are you implying that the system in every voting district is not tested before every election?

Asswipe, WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN ARIZONA ???

Goddammit you leftards are stupid.

 

[Care4all]

Asswipe, WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN ARIZONA ???

Goddammit you leftards are stupid.

Calm down. The voting machines were all tested, including scanners. The printers tested as well....and they ran thru their test runs just fine....

This is why everyone was perplexed, as to why the Scanners would not scan every ballot on election day....when they scanned and read all of them in the test runs.

But there was no worry if scanners or printers failed, because Election protocol had a backup plan...ballot drop box #3 where every voter who had a scanning issue, could cast their vote by dropping their ballot it in the secure box, that would be counted later.

 

[scruffy]

Calm down.

No

The voting machines were all tested, including scanners. The printers tested as well....and they ran thru their test runs just fine....

That is apparently correct. They were tested and certified the night before, as required by Arizona Law.

This is why everyone was perplexed, as to why the ballots would not scan every ballot on election day....when they scanned and read all of them in the test runs.

Everyone was perplexed except the technician who altered the printer settings and the Maricopa election officials who let him do it

But there was no worry if scanners or printers failed, because Election protocol had a backup plan...ballot drop box #3 where every voter who had a scanning issue, could cast their vote by dropping their ballot it in the secure box, that would be counted later.

That is not an excuse. The hardware failure caused voters to be disenfranchised. Several of them have already filed lawsuits

 

[bripat9643]

Those goal posts look heavy.

You claimed it to be a fact that the 2020 election was stolen. Even your fellow Trumpster says that hasn’t been proven.

Whoops! Looks like you’re full of shit.

Did I? Please quote where I did that.

 

[bripat9643]

It doesn’t work that way dumbshit

You just claimed it did.

 

[Care4all]

No




That is apparently correct. They were tested and certified the night before, as required by Arizona Law.




Everyone was perplexed except the technician who altered the printer settings and the Maricopa election officials who let him do it




That is not an excuse. The hardware failure caused voters to be disenfranchised. Several of them have already filed lawsuits

The technicians tried several things, including print to size, of which none completely worked, but shaking the toner bottle, worked best, was reported.

That is not fraud. That is not cheating. That is NOT stealing an election.

Words have meanings, and legal meanings.

The law, is the law. And no one maliciously, or intentionally messed up the printers to cheat, so Kari Lake could lose.

And YES it DOES MATTER, that there was a back up plan in case of any machine error.

The judge ruled in court when Rs tried to sue to keep polls opened 2 hours longer, no one was disenfranchised because of the option to drop their ballot in a drop box, and the longer lines in a handful of locations did not stop citizens from voting in any big number, also the citizen could go to another location, anywhere in the county, to vote. Extended hours of voting was denied by the court.

Not by Democrats.

 

[bripat9643]

You're arguing more police would have been there and shot them up Kent State style? I agree.

No, that's not what I'm arguing, dumbass.

 

[miketx]

Gatewaypundit.

You can read?

 

[bripat9643]

You quote Wikipedia? The original extreme left-wing fake news website?

Talk about fake news.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No, that's not what I'm arguing, dumbass.

Then what are you arguing because it sure looks like you're employing the "it's her fault for wearing that skirt" defense.

 

[bripat9643]

Then what are you arguing because it sure looks like you're employing the "it's her fault for wearing that skirt" defense.

It doesn't look anything like that, dumbass.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It doesn't look anything like that, dumbass.

So what were they supposed to do, given this has never happened before?

 

[notmyfault2020]

Would you be as rabid about the riot on Jan 6 had the parties been reversed? Of course not. You'd have been posting that the riot was a nothingburger, nothing to see there.

LOL

great points, esp that last thing..

 

[scruffy]

The technicians tried several things, including print to size, of which none completely worked, but shaking the toner bottle, worked best, was reported.

"Was reported".

Mm-hmm.

That is not fraud. That is not cheating. That is NOT stealing an election.

You simply do not understand how security works.

This was a grade A USDA prime security violation.