BREAKING: Pennsylvania Provisional Ballots Allowed to be Cast

[Stormy Daniels]

All I know is that it all sounds incredibly shady whether it's legal or not. That's exactly what I'm talking about.

How can it sound "shady" when you don't even know what is being discussed in the first place?

The issue here is whether to count a provisional ballot cast by an individual, if that individual had cast a mail in ballot that ended up getting rejected because it wasn't submitted correctly.

Imagine you cast a mail in ballot. But after you submit the ballot by mail, you realize that you forgot to include the privacy envelope that it's required to have. You know that this will likely result in the ballot being rejected. So, to play it safe you go to the polling place on election day. Of course, since you already were granted a mail-in ballot, the polling place will only allow you to cast a provisional ballot. This is normal procedure all across the country.

When the ballots are counted, and they get to the provisional ballots, they're going to check each provisional against the reason it was cast that way. So when they get to yours, they're going to first check whether a mail-in ballot was received and accepted on your behalf. If your mail-in ballot was accepted, the provision ballot will be rejected. If, on the other hand, no mail-in ballot was received, or if the mail-in ballot was rejected because it lacked the privacy envelope, then your provisional ballot will be counted.

That's all that's happening, here.

 

[Road Runner]

How can it sound "shady" when you don't even know what is being discussed in the first place?

The issue here is whether to count a provisional ballot cast by an individual, if that individual had cast a mail in ballot that ended up getting rejected because it wasn't submitted correctly.

Imagine you cast a mail in ballot. But after you submit the ballot by mail, you realize that you forgot to include the privacy envelope that it's required to have. You know that this will likely result in the ballot being rejected. So, to play it safe you go to the polling place on election day. Of course, since you already were granted a mail-in ballot, the polling place will only allow you to cast a provisional ballot. This is normal procedure all across the country.

When the ballots are counted, and they get to the provisional ballots, they're going to check each provisional against the reason it was cast that way. So when they get to yours, they're going to first check whether a mail-in ballot was received and accepted on your behalf. If your mail-in ballot was accepted, the provision ballot will be rejected. If, on the other hand, no mail-in ballot was received, or if the mail-in ballot was rejected because it lacked the privacy envelope, then your provisional ballot will be counted.

That's all that's happening, here.

I don't care as democrats can still very easily cheat that way. Just because it might be convenient for some people doesn't mean that it also couldn't be taken advantage of. Oh and I would never cast a mail-in ballot btw.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I don't care

Clearly you do care. But all of a sudden, when you're confronted with actual facts, and the whole thing turns out to not be the imaginary boogeyman it was being made out to be, you suddenly lost interest.

as democrats can still very easily cheat that way. Just because it might be convenient for some people doesn't mean that it also couldn't be taken advantage of. Oh and I would never cast a mail-in ballot btw.

No, nobody can "cheat" because of this. This the the very essence of how provisional ballots are counted, everywhere. In this case, it was related to previous mail-in ballots. But provisional ballots are used for all kinds of situations where a voter's right to cast a ballot needs to first be double checked. It's been exactly this way for a very, very, very, long time.

The only reason this became an issue was because one county in particular broke the law and refused to count two people's provisional ballots.

 

[Moonglow]

In related news Democrats found 80,000 provisional ballots in a back room in Dem headquarters labeled open in case of emergency.

and a can of soup.

 

[hjmick]

Clearly you do care. But all of a sudden, when you're confronted with actual facts, and the whole thing turns out to not be the imaginary boogeyman it was being made out to be, you suddenly lost interest.




No, nobody can "cheat" because of this. This the the very essence of how provisional ballots are counted, everywhere. In this case, it was related to previous mail-in ballots. But provisional ballots are used for all kinds of situations where a voter's right to cast a ballot needs to first be double checked. It's been exactly this way for a very, very, very, long time.

The only reason this became an issue was because one county in particular broke the law and refused to count two people's provisional ballots.

What do you expect when the OP's motivation is wanting "to beat anybody else that was going to post about this"? She openly says she only "skimmed" the article so she could post it and beat anyone else who wanted to post it, she wanted to be "first" to post about something that "sounds incredibly shady." No interest in facts, no interest in going beyond her confirmation bias. Just posting for the attention and accolades of the like minded.

 

[Crepitus]

I just heard about this from BluesLegend. I only just skimmed it because I wanted to beat anybody else that was going to post about this because this is a breaking news story.

Supreme Court upholds Pennsylvania provisional ballot ruling, in a major loss for GOP

Republicans in the Keystone State filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court just days before the election regarding the state's processing of provisional ballots.

www.foxnews.com

BluesLegend claimed they could "just dump huge boxes of unmarked ballots on the table...".

That's not what that ruling is about.

 

[Road Runner]

BluesLegend claimed they could "just dump huge boxes of unmarked ballots on the table...".

That's not what that ruling is about.

No shit Sherlock.

 

[Crepitus]

Scoop: Some top Dems won't commit to certifying a Trump win​

Oct 10, 2024

https://www.axios.com/2024/10/11/house-democrats-jan-6-election-trump-raskin

Democrats are hinting they’ll object to a Trump victory​

October 11, 2024

Democrats are hinting they’ll object to a Trump victory - Washington Examiner

If former President Donald Trump wins the election next month, there is a high likelihood that Democrats will object to his victory in Congress in a bid to delegitimize him.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

​

Oh look, a deflection.

That's a sure sigh the poster has NOTHING.

 

[Road Runner]

What do you expect when the OP's motivation is wanting "to beat anybody else that was going to post about this"? She openly says she only "skimmed" the article so she could post it and beat anyone else who wanted to post it, she wanted to be "first" to post about something that "sounds incredibly shady." No interest in facts, no interest in going beyond her confirmation bias. Just posting for the attention and accolades of the like minded.

It's not like that. I just didn't want to accidentally make a duplicate thread about it like I have in the past.

 

[BluesLegend]

All I know is that it all sounds incredibly shady whether it's legal or not. That's exactly what I'm talking about.

There are election laws that require voters to submit a valid ballot...Dems sue to ignore them and count all ballots valid or not.

 

[BluesLegend]

I fully expect to wake up Nov 6th and read that Democrats stole PA in the middle of the night.

 

[BluesLegend]

BluesLegend claimed they could "just dump huge boxes of unmarked ballots on the table...".

That's not what that ruling is about.

Dem ballot copy machines will be working overtime on election night.

 

[jackflash]

I just heard about this from BluesLegend. I only just skimmed it because I wanted to beat anybody else that was going to post about this because this is a breaking news story.

Supreme Court upholds Pennsylvania provisional ballot ruling, in a major loss for GOP

Republicans in the Keystone State filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court just days before the election regarding the state's processing of provisional ballots.

www.foxnews.com

I warned my fellow board members months ago about the problems associated with the mail in ballots due to the riggers. Pennsylvania, home state for the elite 222nd Riga-Votus Division the best division the statist left marxnazis have within their ranks. It's bad enough with the establishment RNC/DNC goons on Capital Hill sleeping together in the same bed but add in the riggers & it's hopeless.