BREAKING NEWS: Trump document case dropped

That Aileen Cannon is a hack?

They've been appointing Special Prosecutors since Watergate without Congressional Approval.

She's probably hoping Trump will win before she's overruled.


No one ever challenged the Constitutionality (and there was a time in which Congress passed a statute* allowing them, since expired).

* Proving the need for statutory law and not some cobbled together DoJ nonsense.
 
She had this planned for weeks. She didn't write a 92 page decision in a few days. The ***** was in the tank for Trump from the beginning & she had a hard on for Jack Smith after she got slapped down twice by the Appelate Court when he appealed her braindead rulings.

She's a disgrace to the Federal Judiciary.
LOL, Triggered again, get used to it. The next four years are not going to be pleasant for you. JUSTICE!
 
No one ever challenged the Constitutionality (and there was a time in which Congress passed a statute* allowing them, since expired).

* Proving the need for statutory law and not some cobbled together DoJ nonsense.
You are a little confused. The Independent Counsel Statutue just formalized what was done during Watergate. After it expired, they went back to the old system.

Now, that said, how would you handle it? Just let the DOJ handle such investigations/prosecutions? That would be subject to partisan interference.
 
I almost hope Trump wins just to see him shove it up your ass along with everyone else.
LOL, I paid less in taxes under Trump than I have under any dem in the last 24 years. I have paid more in inflation, increased fuel prices and sales taxes under the Biden junta than Trump saved me. No increase in taxes for anyone making less than $400K, my ass. When prices increase, gas and sales taxes increase.
 
That Aileen Cannon is a hack?

They've been appointing Special Prosecutors since Watergate without Congressional Approval.

She's probably hoping Trump will win before she's overruled.
name some
 
Ken Starr
Patrick Fitzgerald
Robert Mueller
Ken Starr was appointed under the independent prosecutor stat. That law doesn’t exist anymore

Robert Mueller only investigated and didn’t prosecute Smith

Fitz was appointed and confirmed by the senate in October of 2001

Try again
 
15th post
The same sort of appeal happened with Mueller and was based on the same argument but a Federal judge in VA ruled against Trump. Go figure...

There was no serious court challenge to the Mueller appointment, as we had here.
 
Ken Starr was appointed under the independent prosecutor stat. That law doesn’t exist anymore

Robert Mueller only investigated and didn’t prosecute Smith

Fitz was appointed and confirmed by the senate in October of 2001

Try again
Why do I bother with your illiterate ass?


On December 30, 2003, after then-Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself from the CIA leak grand jury investigation of the Plame affair due to conflicts of interest, Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey, acting as Attorney General in Ashcroft's place, appointed Fitzgerald to the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel in charge of the investigation.[4][5] Fitzgerald was well-known to Comey and was in fact already godfather to one of Comey's children.

On December 30, 2003, three months after the start of the Plame investigation, Fitzgerald was appointed Special Counsel. Through this, Fitzgerald was delegated "all the authority of the Attorney General" in the matter. In February 2004, Acting Attorney General Comey clarified the delegated authority and stated that Fitzgerald has plenary authority. Comey also wrote "further, my conferral on you of the title of 'Special Counsel' in this matter should not be misunderstood to suggest that your position and authorities are defined and limited by 28 CFR Part 600."[23]
 
You are a little confused. The Independent Counsel Statutue just formalized what was done during Watergate. After it expired, they went back to the old system.

Now, that said, how would you handle it? Just let the DOJ handle such investigations/prosecutions? That would be subject to partisan interference.


There was no "old system" that was ever Constitutionally challenged.

So you are the one who is a little confused.
 
Back
Top Bottom