BREAKING NEWS: Trump document case dropped

Only two practical options exist:

1) we apparently have a judge that was willing to proceed with a trial on an unconstutional foundation, until Trump's lawyers brought this to her attention. If her decision is valid.

2) we have a judge making wildly anomalous decisions that show bias to one party

Which makes her, AT BEST, incompetent and not appropriate for handling such an important trial.
If you are discussing the dismissal of the Trump classified document case, I think you are a bit confused.

Judge Cannon who was appointed by Trump has delayed the trial for six months by failing to act on motions by the prosecution and the defense. When the high court ruled that Trump hade some immunity from prosecution for some actions in office, Cannon delayed the trial further to consider if the high court ruling effected this case The prosecution pointed out that the charges in the case were based on Trump ‘s actions after leaving office.

It was then that Cannon decided the procedure used to appoint Smith and every special counsel over the last 50 years was unconstitutional and dismissed the charges.

What she should have done is to put the case on hold and ask the DOJ to resolve the issue so the case could be brought to trial. Apparently her loyalty to Trump outweighed her duty as a federal judge.
 
Last edited:
Before you comment on US domestic issues, educate yourself.
Enlighten me on this issue too - is it true that now in the state of California schools are not required to notify parents that their children have decided to change sex and are already being injected with drugs that stop them from going through puberty?
 
Enlighten me on this issue too - is it true that now in the state of California schools are not required to notify parents that their children have decided to change sex and are already being injected with drugs that stop them from going through puberty?
So it has been reported. Look it up.
 
If you are discussing the dismissal of the Trump classified document case, I think you are a bit confused.

Judge Cannon who was appointed by Trump has delayed the trial for six months by failing to act on motions by the prosecution and the defense. When the high court ruled that Trump hade some immunity from prosecution for some actions in office, Cannon delayed the trial further to consider if the high court ruling effected this case The prosecution pointed out that the charges in the case were based on Trump ‘s actions after leaving office.

It was then that Cannon decided the procedure used to appoint Smith and every special counsel over the last 50 years was unconstitutional and dismissed the charges.

What she should have done is to put the case on hold and ask the DOJ to resolve the issue so the case could be brought to trial. Apparently her loyalty to Trump outweighed her duty as a federal judge.
I think maybne you read my post wrong.

Either she was going to let an unconstitutional trial proceed, until Trump's lawyers and Clarence Thomas informed her it was not constitutional.

Or the trial IS constitutional, and she made yet another poor decision showing bias to Trump.

Those appear to be the two choices. And both mean she is not competent enough or fit to preside over this trial.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom