Breaking News: Sandmann lawyer joins Rittenhouse team, says Zuckerberg a 'top' target of numerous 'solid' lawsuits

[Coyote]

That I would very much like to see! He might have some exposure as he associated Rittenhouse with white supremacists.

Rittenhouse associated himself with white supremacists

That is going to make it pretty tough to sue for defamation.

 

[Ringtone]

Rittenhouse associated himself with white supremacists

View attachment 653290

That is going to make it pretty tough to sue for defamation.

He's sharing adult beverages with others; therefore, he's a white supremacist? Others are sharing adult beverages with him; therefore, they're white supremacists?

Can you say logical fallacy?

 

[westwall]

Rittenhouse associated himself with white supremacists

View attachment 653290

That is going to make it pretty tough to sue for defamation.

Drinking in a public bar is not "associating" with white supremacists.

 

[Coyote]

Drinking in a public bar is not "associating" with white supremacists.

It was a bit more than that. Won’t look good in a lawsuit. This is nothing more than lawyers taking advantage.

 

[Coyote]

He's sharing adult beverages with others; therefore, he's a white supremacist? Others are sharing adult beverages with him; therefore, they're white supremacists?

Can you say logical fallacy?

Posing for photographs with them? Flashing what looked like white supremacy hand signals? Defense will have fun with that.

 

[Ringtone]

He also refused to stay out of the public, he was on Fox, gave interviews etc … he is public figure, and killed two people. He is by no means Sandmann.

Speech that emphatically libels or defames a public figure is not exempt from civil litigation. What the hell are you talking about?

 

[westwall]

It was a bit more than that. Won’t look good in a lawsuit. This is nothing more than lawyers taking advantage.

You run with that. Rittenhouse is going to be a multi millionaire by the time this is all over.

 

[Coyote]

You run with that. Rittenhouse is going to be a multi millionaire by the time this is all over.

We will see. He did kill two people after all.

 

[westwall]

Posing for photographs with them? Flashing what looked like white supremacy hand signals? Defense will have fun with that.

You mean the famous "OK" symbol. Get real.

 

[Ringtone]

It was a bit more than that. Won’t look good in a lawsuit. This is nothing more than lawyers taking advantage.

You're making things up. I know who those other guys are. They are not white supremacists.

 

[westwall]

We will see. He did kill two people after all.

Yeah. LEGALLY. You keep ignoring that FACT.

 

[Coyote]

You mean the famous "OK" symbol. Get real.

While posing with white supremacists.

 

[Ringtone]

We will see. He did kill two people after all.

In self-defense!

 

[Coyote]

Yeah. LEGALLY. You keep ignoring that FACT.

Doesn’t matter.

 

[Coyote]

In self-defense!

Ya, and OJ Simpson didn’t kill Nicole and Ron.

 

[westwall]

While posing with white supremacists.

It doesn't mean anything to a white supremacist. That was a prank pulled by 4chan.

Only idiots still believe that nonsense.

 

[westwall]

Ya, and OJ Simpson didn’t kill Nicole and Ron.

Rittenhouse has a Court Ruling that says he lawfully killed in self defense.

OJ doesn't.

 

[westwall]

Doesn’t matter.

Only if you don't believe in the rule of law.

 

[Ringtone]

Ya, and OJ Simpson didn’t kill Nicole and Ron.

Comparing the travesty of the OJ verdict, eh? Can you say false equivalency fallacy? By the way, the jurors didn't let him off because they thought he was innocent. On the contrary, three of them admitted that they believed he was guilty. Everybody knows why he was left off.

 

[Coyote]

Comparing the travesty of the OJ verdict, eh? Can you say false equivalency fallacy? By the way, the jurors didn't let him off because they thought he was innocent. On the contrary, three of them admitted that they believed he was guilty. Everybody knows why he was left off.

Any verdict can be a travesty - just depends on how you see justice. The jurors didn’t let Rittenhouse off because they believed he was innocent, but because there is such a high bar set for conviction, same as with OJ. If there is any doubt at all, the can’t convict. Civil suits however are different, with a much lower bar for conviction (OJ was convicted in one) and Rittenhouse is already facing at least one. If he loses, he won’t be able to profit off of killing two people. No one should profit off killing.