Breaking News: PA Federal Judge Rules Obama's Amnesty Unconstitutional; Says Obama Usurped Congress

[The Rabbi]

And I see the Obama Administration promises to ignore the ruling because they say the judge shouldn't have ruled on it.
That is a full blown crisis brewing.
Thanks, Obama!

 

[Care4all]

Hawaii is part of the United States.

Except for that teeny tiny piece of Hawaii Obama was born on.

 

[SwimExpert]

The president has no power to act as COngress where Congress refuses to act. Congresses passes laws, not the president.

Setting priorities for the use of allocated resources is not acting "as Congress." Congress provides the funds, the President uses them in the most effective way he sees fit. Whomever said it earlier is correct, Congressional Republicans created this mess by failing to legislate an effective, fully funded immigration law.

 

[mdk]

I believe Obama's executive actions in this instance are in violation of the precedent set forth by the SC in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

oh brother, here we go. Is this the same judge that said the Obama BC was bogus ?

yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.

Could be... but considering that the Peasantpimp of the Union States is not a natural-born US citizen, given that his father was a foreign national... he is disqualified from being President of the US.

And... the cert he has provided is not just a forgery, but a hysterically BAD forgery.

 

[Care4all]

So this is what the Judge said and is telling the courts this young man has the right to change his guilty plea....?

So, is this judge actually advocating for this illegal Elionardo guy to be allowed to stay in this country and you all are AGREEING with the Judge, or are you all agreeing with the Administration that this guy could be and should be deported?

The case before Judge Schwab involved an illegal immigrant, Elionardo Juarez-Escobar, who was deported in 2005 but snuck back into the U.S., ending up in Pittsburgh, where his brother, a U.S. citizen, owned a landscaping company.

Juarez-Escobar went to work for his brother, but was snared in a traffic stop by local police earlier this year, and was reported to federal authorities, who charged him with illegally reentering the U.S.

Judge Schwab wanted to know why Mr. Obama’s new amnesty didn’t apply to Juarez-Escobar, who has already pleaded guilty to the illegal reentry charge. Judge Schwab has said Juarez-Escobar could be allowed to change his plea.

And the judge questioned why Mr. Obama’s new policy only applied to parent-child relationships and not to Juarez-Escobar, who has a “close bond” with his brother. The judge said Juarez-Escobar appears to be “more ‘family’ than ‘felon,’” which would seem to make him a low priority under the president’s deportation policies.

Judge Schwab was appointed to the federal courts by President George W. Bush, taking his seat in 2002.

 

[The Rabbi]

The president has no power to act as COngress where Congress refuses to act. Congresses passes laws, not the president.

Setting priorities for the use of allocated resources is not acting "as Congress." Congress provides the funds, the President uses them in the most effective way he sees fit. Whomever said it earlier is correct, Congressional Republicans created this mess by failing to legislate an effective, fully funded immigration law.

This goes beyond setting priorities. The explicit reason for the action was lack of Congressional action, not budget or practical constraints.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

I like his argument. It’s an angle I hadn’t thought of, and it may wind up being very powerful.


District court declares Obama immigration action unconstitutional - The Washington Post

From your link: """The memo came as part of a deportation case before the judge, and Judge Schwab’s order does not invalidate the president’s policies."""

Sounds like yet another grumpy old white man like you, asshole.

 

[SwimExpert]

The president has no power to act as COngress where Congress refuses to act. Congresses passes laws, not the president.

Setting priorities for the use of allocated resources is not acting "as Congress." Congress provides the funds, the President uses them in the most effective way he sees fit. Whomever said it earlier is correct, Congressional Republicans created this mess by failing to legislate an effective, fully funded immigration law.

This goes beyond setting priorities. The explicit reason for the action was lack of Congressional action, not budget or practical constraints.

And sometimes a cop pulls you over because you're black. Does not change the fact that doing 75 in a 55 zone was illegal.

Bush did things because God told him to. Clinton did things because his other head told him to. The subjective reasons for a President's actions do not effect their objective legality.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Constitutional crisis coming?

Constitutional crisis coming?

coming? the RW has been in the middle of a Constitutional crisis ever since Obama said he was running for president in 08.

Because we are smart enough to know a fraud when we see one and lies when we here them, like the ones you guys say, daily.

All you have stupid is stupid, retard. Pull rdean off your dick and speak.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Hardly breaking news. A judge's opinion based on a memo he wrote because he has a stick up his ass like SteveMcGarrett is hardly news.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Let's not all at once trip over each other to post about this.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

It's really too bad that the USMB doesn't have some sort of low bar set to discourage assholes like SteveMcGarrett who posts racist avatars and "Breaking news" based on bullshit from a tabloid.

 

[g5000]

I believe Obama's executive actions in this instance are in violation of the precedent set forth by the SC in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.

The President did not make any laws. He is simply deferring action on deportation. If anything, he is refusing to execute the law, not making laws. So, no, Youngstown does not apply here.

 

[The Rabbi]

The president has no power to act as COngress where Congress refuses to act. Congresses passes laws, not the president.

Setting priorities for the use of allocated resources is not acting "as Congress." Congress provides the funds, the President uses them in the most effective way he sees fit. Whomever said it earlier is correct, Congressional Republicans created this mess by failing to legislate an effective, fully funded immigration law.

This goes beyond setting priorities. The explicit reason for the action was lack of Congressional action, not budget or practical constraints.

And sometimes a cop pulls you over because you're black. Does not change the fact that doing 75 in a 55 zone was illegal.

Bush did things because God told him to. Clinton did things because his other head told him to. The subjective reasons for a President's actions do not effect their objective legality.

Wow, that was the stupidest post I've seen from you to date.
The explicit purpose of the order was to circumvent Congress. That is illegal under the Constitution.

 

[The Rabbi]

It's really too bad that the USMB doesn't have some sort of low bar set to discourage assholes like SteveMcGarrett who posts racist avatars and "Breaking news" based on bullshit from a tabloid.

If it did you would have been long long gone.

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

That can't be determined since Obama's birth certificate released on April 27, 2011 was concluded too be a 100% forgery by the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office.

 

[The Rabbi]

I believe Obama's executive actions in this instance are in violation of the precedent set forth by the SC in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer.

The President did not make any laws. He is simply deferring action on deportation. If anything, he is refusing to execute the law, not making laws. So, no, Youngstown does not apply here.

The president doesnt get to refuse to execute laws. That is a violation of his oath and his duties. As the judge pointed out.

 

[Syriusly]

t (who lacked an American experience growing up)

Birthers....lol.....is it that they don't know Hawaii is part of the United States- or just reject that Hawaiians are real Americans?

OBABBLE lived there...and said it was the 58th state.

So do you agree with the OP and that Hawaii is not a real part of America?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Probably just a temporary win, but funnier than shit nonetheless. Eat it raw Obama !