Liberal Judge Rules Ousting Illegal Aliens Who Reenter the Country 'Racist' and 'Unconstitutional' Liberal Judge Rules Ousting Illegal Aliens

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
17,923
33,963
2,290
The insanity from leftoids never ceases, never ceases to find new lower lows.

And, of course, an Ƙbama appointed 'judge'.


It may surprise you to learn that the most common type of case federal prosecutors bring is not for drugs or fraud, as many think. As reported by The Washington Times, that honor goes to cases against illegal aliens who try to reenter the country after having been deported. And almost all those charged are Hispanic, of course.
Now, according to The Times, federal courts are facing the ridiculous question of whether the ā€œimbalanceā€ in deportations means U.S. immigration law isā€¦ wait for itā€¦ racist.
Ridiculous? One court in Nevada has ruled it means exactly that.
Judge Miranda Du, an Obama appointee [no kidding?], said the section of immigration law that makes it a felony for an illegal alien previously ousted to sneak back into the country ā€œhas racist antecedents dating to the 1920s.ā€ This is insane.
Though the law has been updated since then, noted The Times, Congress has never ā€œconfronted the racist, nativist rootsā€ of the law, Du ruled. She said that fact ā€” coupled with the overwhelmingly Hispanic targets for prosecution ā€” makes the law unconstitutional. This is beyond insane.
...
Kris Kobach, a former Republican secretary of state in Kansas and prominent legal figure among groups pushing for stricter immigration control thinks the judgeā€™s ruling is ridiculous, as transcribed by The Times.
The judgeā€™s conclusions are ridiculous. The law is neutral on its face, and it is justified by a multitude of legitimate reasons having nothing to do with race.

It is nonsense to declare that the statute must be ā€˜cleansedā€™ in some way because an unknown number of legislators who supported a predecessor statute a century ago might have been racially biased.

Obviously, Kobach is a white supremacist.
But Kobach was right. ā€œRidiculousā€ doesnā€™t even begin to describe this latest example of ā€œprogressiveā€ insanity. As Iā€™ve suggested multiple times in the past and will undoubtedly continue to suggest in the future, everything Democrats support, oppose, propose, or reject can be connected to the ballot box with no more than two dots.
...


 
The insanity from leftoids never ceases, never ceases to find new lower lows.

And, of course, an Ƙbama appointed 'judge'.


It may surprise you to learn that the most common type of case federal prosecutors bring is not for drugs or fraud, as many think. As reported by The Washington Times, that honor goes to cases against illegal aliens who try to reenter the country after having been deported. And almost all those charged are Hispanic, of course.
Now, according to The Times, federal courts are facing the ridiculous question of whether the ā€œimbalanceā€ in deportations means U.S. immigration law isā€¦ wait for itā€¦ racist.
Ridiculous? One court in Nevada has ruled it means exactly that.
Judge Miranda Du, an Obama appointee [no kidding?], said the section of immigration law that makes it a felony for an illegal alien previously ousted to sneak back into the country ā€œhas racist antecedents dating to the 1920s.ā€ This is insane.
Though the law has been updated since then, noted The Times, Congress has never ā€œconfronted the racist, nativist rootsā€ of the law, Du ruled. She said that fact ā€” coupled with the overwhelmingly Hispanic targets for prosecution ā€” makes the law unconstitutional. This is beyond insane.
...
Kris Kobach, a former Republican secretary of state in Kansas and prominent legal figure among groups pushing for stricter immigration control thinks the judgeā€™s ruling is ridiculous, as transcribed by The Times.




Obviously, Kobach is a white supremacist.
But Kobach was right. ā€œRidiculousā€ doesnā€™t even begin to describe this latest example of ā€œprogressiveā€ insanity. As Iā€™ve suggested multiple times in the past and will undoubtedly continue to suggest in the future, everything Democrats support, oppose, propose, or reject can be connected to the ballot box with no more than two dots.
...


Judge Du, sucks! To my way of thinking, it ought to be a felony the first time they are caught sneaking in, and a disqualifier for re-entry. If deported for any reason, and they sneak in again, it should automatically be an additional felony with automatic sentencing of 1-3 years and deportation again, after that. :mad:
 
Obama will probably go down as the President who appointed the most anti American judges during his tenure. His appointments really sucked.
 
1640814572441.png



America was made great because the people, whose values and cultural background were reflective of one another, and those of the founders.

When you replace all of the Europeans with non-Europeans and expect non-Europeans to hold the same cultural standard....you are setting yourself up for a fall...

In 1950 the USA was 89% white European....today it's less than 60%

There is no magic dirt.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 581174


America was made great because the people, whose values and cultural background were reflective of one another, and those of the founders.

When you replace all of the Europeans with non-Europeans and expect non-Europeans to hold the same cultural standard.

In 1950 the USA was 89% white European....today it's less than 60%

There is no magic dirt.
No. But, there is the US Constitution and the intent of the framers of the constitution for the continuation of the country, under that document and laws.
 
No. But, there is the US Constitution and the intent of the framers of the constitution for the continuation of the country, under that document and laws.
Cultures promote ideals which shape the interpretation of founding documents.

Whether one agrees that those documents are 'living' or not, the rulings of judges, and legislators affect all aspects of culture.

An electorate chooses those candidates, and places those individuals in those positions to shape a culture.

Demographics are everything in a culture.

You must maintain demographic homeostasis to maintain a culture.

Borders, language, AND culture.

There is no magic dirt.

Once the demography shifts to a certain extent the culture is irrevocably changed forever as external influence is too overpowering.
 
Cultures promote ideals which shape the interpretation of founding documents.

Whether one agrees that those documents are 'living' or not, the rulings of judges, and legislators affect all aspects of culture.

An electorate chooses those candidates, and places those individuals in those positions to shape a culture.

Demographics are everything in a culture.

You must maintain demographic homeostasis to maintain a culture.

Borders, language, AND culture.

There is no magic dirt.

Once the demography shifts to a certain extent the culture is irrevocably changed forever as external influence is too overpowering.
This is why, lower court ruling get overturned on appeal. We are not changing to open borders for you. If that is what you want, now that you are here, go the FK home.
 
Illegals don't get to define American homeostasis. American democracy excludes them so that the border of a nation can be defined.
 
So let me get this straight.
The majority of those entering the country illegally are Hispanic, so when the majority of individuals are deported turn out to be Hispanic, it's racist?
 

Forum List

Back
Top