There's always a new lie coming down the pike.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BREAKING: New “Fold Effect” Finding in New Hampshire — Could Impact Entire State Results in New Hampshire and Possibly Three Other States
- Thread starter The Purge
- Start date
There's always a new lie coming down the pike.
True.It's caring and concern for you, so that you are not so easily deceived by this garbage you are being fed, and for the health of the nation....Why are the Psychocrats so apoplectic about an audit if they are so sure there was no election rigging.
....another red flag
the truth will set you free,
But conservatives know there was no ‘fraud,’ and they don’t care.
They continue to propagate these lies with the intent of harming the health of the Nation.
/———/ My new hatSo, what's the proof of fraud that you apparently see, in the op post?“But, but, but, there’s no proof of fraud!”Earlier today, auditors in Windham, New Hampshire started testing if “folds in ballots” impacted the vote counts in the 2020 election.
If this is true then this could impact the entire state of New Hampshire.
** The Palmieri Report first reported on this earlier today.
The recount of the votes was very close to the hand recount from November 12. That means the voting machines are confirmed to be unreliable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
---------------------
Jovan Pulitzer talks about this.
They can tell if a mailed ballot was ever mailed by the creases in the paper.
Unfortunately, exposing the methodology used for the Fraudulent Election of 2020 will prepare them for how to cheat in future elections.
View attachment 492461
Attachments
Your delusion, turning you in to a criminal, and your dear leader, not bailing you out.....If that is all true, what are you worried about? Shouldn't you spend your time on what you think is a real problem?Recount all you want, the fraudit means nothing.... Your side made certain from the get go, that it would mean nothing, by hiring a partisan hack, working for Sidney Powell to do it, by only allowing OANN inside 24/7 with cameras, by hiring a firm who has never done an election audit, by not being opened to the press, by a whole bunch of crapola like that, set the stage for the fraudit to being nothing other than a campaigning propaganda tool, to fleece you for donations...and appease the narcissist who's demented feelings got hurt../----/ Says the libtard who wants any recounts and investigation stopped immediately.Nope. All nonsense!Earlier today, auditors in Windham, New Hampshire started testing if “folds in ballots” impacted the vote counts in the 2020 election.
If this is true then this could impact the entire state of New Hampshire.
** The Palmieri Report first reported on this earlier today.
The recount of the votes was very close to the hand recount from November 12. That means the voting machines are confirmed to be unreliable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
---------------------
Jovan Pulitzer talks about this.
They can tell if a mailed ballot was ever mailed by the creases in the paper.
Unfortunately, exposing the methodology used for the Fraudulent Election of 2020 will prepare them for how to cheat in future elections.
It's A political strategy, nothing more.
What did 46 ever do to you?/———/ My new hatSo, what's the proof of fraud that you apparently see, in the op post?“But, but, but, there’s no proof of fraud!”Earlier today, auditors in Windham, New Hampshire started testing if “folds in ballots” impacted the vote counts in the 2020 election.
If this is true then this could impact the entire state of New Hampshire.
** The Palmieri Report first reported on this earlier today.
The recount of the votes was very close to the hand recount from November 12. That means the voting machines are confirmed to be unreliable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
---------------------
Jovan Pulitzer talks about this.
They can tell if a mailed ballot was ever mailed by the creases in the paper.
Unfortunately, exposing the methodology used for the Fraudulent Election of 2020 will prepare them for how to cheat in future elections.
View attachment 492461
Corey Lewandowski is in NH....that explains all...I don't believe we're going through this shit again.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,054
- 9,694
- 2,138
The New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,600
- 2,220
The primaries are a whole different matter. Once the choice was T**** and Biden, of course the Dems (and Independents) voted for President Biden. Do you think they were going to vote for T**** because Bernie lost? LOLThe New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Turtlesoup
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2020
- 15,903
- 16,731
- 2,288
Stolen trillions from US taxpayers present and future, sold out to the chinese, causing wars around the world, already has blood on his hands and lets not even discuss the illegals and all the damage they are doing now and for generations to come.Your delusion, turning you in to a criminal, and your dear leader, not bailing you out.....If that is all true, what are you worried about? Shouldn't you spend your time on what you think is a real problem?Recount all you want, the fraudit means nothing.... Your side made certain from the get go, that it would mean nothing, by hiring a partisan hack, working for Sidney Powell to do it, by only allowing OANN inside 24/7 with cameras, by hiring a firm who has never done an election audit, by not being opened to the press, by a whole bunch of crapola like that, set the stage for the fraudit to being nothing other than a campaigning propaganda tool, to fleece you for donations...and appease the narcissist who's demented feelings got hurt../----/ Says the libtard who wants any recounts and investigation stopped immediately.Nope. All nonsense!Earlier today, auditors in Windham, New Hampshire started testing if “folds in ballots” impacted the vote counts in the 2020 election.
If this is true then this could impact the entire state of New Hampshire.
** The Palmieri Report first reported on this earlier today.
The recount of the votes was very close to the hand recount from November 12. That means the voting machines are confirmed to be unreliable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
---------------------
Jovan Pulitzer talks about this.
They can tell if a mailed ballot was ever mailed by the creases in the paper.
Unfortunately, exposing the methodology used for the Fraudulent Election of 2020 will prepare them for how to cheat in future elections.
It's A political strategy, nothing more.
What did 46 ever do to you?/———/ My new hatSo, what's the proof of fraud that you apparently see, in the op post?“But, but, but, there’s no proof of fraud!”Earlier today, auditors in Windham, New Hampshire started testing if “folds in ballots” impacted the vote counts in the 2020 election.
If this is true then this could impact the entire state of New Hampshire.
** The Palmieri Report first reported on this earlier today.
The recount of the votes was very close to the hand recount from November 12. That means the voting machines are confirmed to be unreliable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
---------------------
Jovan Pulitzer talks about this.
They can tell if a mailed ballot was ever mailed by the creases in the paper.
Unfortunately, exposing the methodology used for the Fraudulent Election of 2020 will prepare them for how to cheat in future elections.
View attachment 492461
- Banned
- #29
The primaries are a whole different matter. Once the choice was T**** and Biden, of course the Dems (and Independents) voted for President Biden. Do you think they were going to vote for T**** because Bernie lost? LOLThe New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Translation = because Dems cheat in their own primaries, it is OK to cheat in a general
OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,600
- 2,220
There's no indication they cheated in their primaries or in the general election.The primaries are a whole different matter. Once the choice was T**** and Biden, of course the Dems (and Independents) voted for President Biden. Do you think they were going to vote for T**** because Bernie lost? LOLThe New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Translation = because Dems cheat in their own primaries, it is OK to cheat in a general
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,344
- 51,722
- 3,600
There's no indication they cheated in their primaries or in the general election.The primaries are a whole different matter. Once the choice was T**** and Biden, of course the Dems (and Independents) voted for President Biden. Do you think they were going to vote for T**** because Bernie lost? LOLThe New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Translation = because Dems cheat in their own primaries, it is OK to cheat in a general
Turtlesoup
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2020
- 15,903
- 16,731
- 2,288
they cheat all the time even against each otherThere's no indication they cheated in their primaries or in the general election.The primaries are a whole different matter. Once the choice was T**** and Biden, of course the Dems (and Independents) voted for President Biden. Do you think they were going to vote for T**** because Bernie lost? LOLThe New Hampshire voters know traitor Joe. He has been through NH during multiple primaries.
Can a left wing liar here spin how Joe did in NH?
Hint - before the machines helped him "win," there was a primary in 2020. Surely this Reagan/Clinton caliber candidate with 100% name recognition blew away the field,right??
Um, no.
As the voters of NH got to observe Joe closely, he went off a cliff, finishing fifth behind Pocahontas in the single digits. Better than 90% of dems voted against him.
And the left wants us to believe he is a Reagan/Bill Clinton caliber candidate.....
Once again, as with so many leftwing lies, this one gets busted on the first check....
Translation = because Dems cheat in their own primaries, it is OK to cheat in a general
Similar threads
- Replies
- 625
- Views
- 22K
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 551
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 462
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 10K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 50
- Views
- 255
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 77
- Replies
- 268
- Views
- 2K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-