BREAKING: King Obama to wave his scepter and create new gun purchase background checks

[Maryland Patriot]

He is wanting to close the loop hole for gun show dealers...oh my!!!

There is no loophole. Y'all need to stop saying that.

You stop saying that there is none, since there is, dorkmiester...

Known as the "gun show loophole," most states do not require background checks for firearms purchased at gun shows from private individuals -- federal law only requires licensed dealers to conduct checks.

Gun Show Background Checks State Laws

Wrong. There's no law against a citizen selling his private property to another citizen.

There is in some states...

There are laws that would keep me from selling a lawnmower to my neighbor?

Link?

If your neighbor is a typical liberal, I think such a law would be a good thing when it comes to public safety.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Actually it comes with a Masters in Psychology,
But certainly with all of your credentials, there is no need to point that out to you.
As far as your credentials really go? by the comment you made you show a lack of understanding in some basic first year studies so I have to doubt your credibility.
Lying can be expected from an LEO, that is after all what you do best.

Curriculum differs from state to state, as someone who claims to be a certified therapist should know. In CA one must complete hours of supervised counseling post graduate degree to become a Licensed Therapist, an MFT.

LMFT License Requirement - California Board of Behavioral Sciences

• 104 weeks of supervision
• 3,000 hours of supervised work experience

In CA one does not become licensed or certified automatically when they graduate with an advance degree.

BTW, You've proven to be a POS, most therapist wouldn't treat others in the manner you have, thus I can conclude without further evidence you are full of shit.

 

[PredFan]

ODS is a sad form of mental illness.

Jesus! Can't you retards come up with something original, ever?

"Original" like histrionics over policies that haven't even been announced, calling the president names, and false bravado over how you won't "comply"?

We've never heard that before.

Yeah well you haven't, nit wit.

 

[PredFan]

Barack Hussein Obama, you miserable disgusting traitor, I will not comply. Go fuck yourself.

Yes, it's terrible that an American president is trying to do something about mass murder in society.

He isn't. Only a fool believes that. It isn't about saving lives, it's about control and pushing the agenda. If he wanted to save lives, he would look into the "why" and not the "how".

 

[PredFan]

ODS is a sad form of mental illness.

Jesus! Can't you retards come up with something original, ever?

Just stating the facts and truth, neither of which ever change.

Your bizarre obsession with the president, that everything he does is 'wrong,' and the ridiculous lies you and others on the right contrive about Obama are clearly some form of mental illness, the consequence of blind hyper-partisanism.

Most whining about 'Obama' don't even know the facts of the proposed EO.

For example, background checks would apply only to those who sell 50 or more firearms per year, having no effect whatsoever on gun owners who engage in less frequent private intrastate sales.

If issued, the EO will afford authorities an enforcement mechanism consistent with existing law, in no way creating 'new law' or 'amending' existing law.

Last, comprehensive background checks are Constitutional, as Colorado's measure requiring such checks was upheld in Federal court in June of 2014.

But don't let facts and the truth stand in the way of your inane, childish attacks.

ZZZZZzzzzzzz.......

 

[2aguy]

Looks like you've lost. The facts are these:

• I'm a Democrat, a liberal on social issues, and fiscally responsible on economic issues;
• I'm straight, married for 41 years, have two sons and since I'm not gay curious and thus not homophobic you're wrong again;
• I'm retired from a 32 year career in LE, having worked as a deputy, supervisor and manager, I retired at age 57 and now, ten years later, have a combined annual income of nearly $140,000 (Pension, SS and investment incomes).

And one more thing, calling someone a cocksucker is a sign of homophobia, a condition likely created by being molested as a child and enjoying the experience, and thus angry at themselves for liking the experience.

I was using hyperbole, dude. I twas not a serious attempt to force you out of the closet in any respect.

Your secrets are safe with me, dude.

"dude". You need to learn your place, respond to me by using "Sir" or "Mr. Catcher". Your opinion is worthless when it is offered in the context of an historical document and framed by an ad hominem.

Limit you opinions to subjective fact, such as, "it's warm in here" or "I'm hungry". I will respond to the latter with, "Well Mr. Hungry, what would you like eat?"

Opinions on the meaning of many sections of COTUS are legit, if one frames them with the Art. Sec. and Clause, for many are ambiguous, and easily spun to fit one's agenda.

actually "twit" is more accurate....

 

[bodecea]

Barack Hussein Obama, you miserable disgusting traitor, I will not comply. Go fuck yourself.

Yes, it's terrible that an American president is trying to do something about mass murder in society.

He isn't. Only a fool believes that. It isn't about saving lives, it's about control and pushing the agenda. If he wanted to save lives, he would look into the "why" and not the "how".

Yes...we know that the RW isn't capable of comprehending that anyone would want to attempt to end the gun slaughter.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

ODS is a sad form of mental illness.

Jesus! Can't you retards come up with something original, ever?

"Original" like histrionics over policies that haven't even been announced, calling the president names, and false bravado over how you won't "comply"?

We've never heard that before.

Yeah well you haven't, nit wit.

Only almost every single day for the last 7 years.

 

[PredFan]

Barack Hussein Obama, you miserable disgusting traitor, I will not comply. Go fuck yourself.

Yes, it's terrible that an American president is trying to do something about mass murder in society.

He isn't. Only a fool believes that. It isn't about saving lives, it's about control and pushing the agenda. If he wanted to save lives, he would look into the "why" and not the "how".

Yes...we know that the RW isn't capable of comprehending that anyone would want to attempt to end the gun slaughter.

What you don't know is that what you and your idiot president plan to do won't save a single life. You don't know that because you are a fucking idiot.

 

[MaryL]

We knew this would be coming.

Obama to announce new executive action on guns

CNN)President Barack Obama is expected to announce in the coming days a new executive action with the goal of expanding background checks on gun sales, people familiar with White House planning said.

Described as "imminent," the set of executive actions would fulfill a promise by the President to take further unilateral steps the White House says could help curb gun deaths.

Plans for the action are not yet complete, and those familiar with the process warn that unforeseen circumstances could delay an announcement. But gun control advocates are expecting the new actions to be revealed next week, ahead of Obama's annual State of the Union address, set for January 12.

The White House wouldn't comment directly on the exact timing or content of Obama's executive orders. White House spokesman Eric Schultz said that the President expected a set of recommendations on unilateral action to arrive at the beginning of the year.

He said Obama was "expressing urgency" for a list of steps he can take on his own after high-profile incidents of gun violence at the end of this year.

"It is complicated. That's why it's taken some time for our policy folks, our lawyers, and our expects to work through this and see what's possible," Schultz said.

Gun control advocates and White House officials say the focus remains on the so-called "gun show loophole," which allows certain sellers of guns -- at gun shows and elsewhere -- to avoid conducting background checks before making sales.

Months after the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school massacre that claimed 26 victims, the then-Democratic majority Senate rejected a similar proposal.

Congress would still need to act in order to make background checks fully universal. But advocates and administration lawyers have struck upon a provision in the law that could allow for Obama to expand the background check requirement to additional sellers.

Federal law currently requires all individuals "engaged in the business" of selling guns to obtain a license and conduct background checks on buyers. But others who only make occasional sales or are selling firearms from a personal collection are exempted from the background check requirement.

Gun control advocates say Obama could take action himself by issuing a regulation that provides expanded guidance on who falls under the "in the business" standard.

One group, the Michael Bloomberg-helmed Everytown for Gun Safety, has provided recommendations to the White House that include creating a test for assessing who must become licensed to continue selling guns. Factors would include volume and speed of sales, and whether or not the seller relies on advertising to sell guns.

The group also recommended Obama define a gun in a "personal collection" as having been in the seller's possession for at least a year.

Before leaving for his winter vacation in Hawaii, Obama met with Bloomberg at the White House to discuss gun control.

Aside from the background check provision, people familiar with Obama's plans say his new gun control announcement will include new funding for government agencies to better enforce existing gun laws.



Promoted Stories

Obama to announce new executive action on guns - CNNPolitics.com

GOOD. Why is it conservatives in other countries actually work towards limiting gun violence, instead of just enabling it? They don't hide behind pretense and keep fueling the fire, they actually work towards limiting gun violence. Enough of this pandering to gun owners.

 

[aaronleland]

For the 35th year in a row, X is going to take my guns. Everybody panic!

Think of it this way; suppose the government were going to regulate your use of condoms.

What's a condom? lol

Aren't you afraid you'll get your husband pregnant?

I failed sex ed by the way.

 

[mdk]

For the 35th year in a row, X is going to take my guns. Everybody panic!

Think of it this way; suppose the government were going to regulate your use of condoms.

What's a condom? lol

Aren't you afraid you'll get your husband pregnant?

I failed sex ed by the way.

We keep trying though.

 

[blackhawk]

I would be curious to know exactly what you would add to background checks that is not already in them. This souds more like political smoke and mirrors more than a real effort to curb gun violence.

 

[Stephanie]

We knew this would be coming.

Obama to announce new executive action on guns

CNN)President Barack Obama is expected to announce in the coming days a new executive action with the goal of expanding background checks on gun sales, people familiar with White House planning said.

Described as "imminent," the set of executive actions would fulfill a promise by the President to take further unilateral steps the White House says could help curb gun deaths.

Plans for the action are not yet complete, and those familiar with the process warn that unforeseen circumstances could delay an announcement. But gun control advocates are expecting the new actions to be revealed next week, ahead of Obama's annual State of the Union address, set for January 12.

The White House wouldn't comment directly on the exact timing or content of Obama's executive orders. White House spokesman Eric Schultz said that the President expected a set of recommendations on unilateral action to arrive at the beginning of the year.

He said Obama was "expressing urgency" for a list of steps he can take on his own after high-profile incidents of gun violence at the end of this year.

"It is complicated. That's why it's taken some time for our policy folks, our lawyers, and our expects to work through this and see what's possible," Schultz said.

Gun control advocates and White House officials say the focus remains on the so-called "gun show loophole," which allows certain sellers of guns -- at gun shows and elsewhere -- to avoid conducting background checks before making sales.

Months after the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school massacre that claimed 26 victims, the then-Democratic majority Senate rejected a similar proposal.

Congress would still need to act in order to make background checks fully universal. But advocates and administration lawyers have struck upon a provision in the law that could allow for Obama to expand the background check requirement to additional sellers.

Federal law currently requires all individuals "engaged in the business" of selling guns to obtain a license and conduct background checks on buyers. But others who only make occasional sales or are selling firearms from a personal collection are exempted from the background check requirement.

Gun control advocates say Obama could take action himself by issuing a regulation that provides expanded guidance on who falls under the "in the business" standard.

One group, the Michael Bloomberg-helmed Everytown for Gun Safety, has provided recommendations to the White House that include creating a test for assessing who must become licensed to continue selling guns. Factors would include volume and speed of sales, and whether or not the seller relies on advertising to sell guns.

The group also recommended Obama define a gun in a "personal collection" as having been in the seller's possession for at least a year.

Before leaving for his winter vacation in Hawaii, Obama met with Bloomberg at the White House to discuss gun control.

Aside from the background check provision, people familiar with Obama's plans say his new gun control announcement will include new funding for government agencies to better enforce existing gun laws.



Promoted Stories

Obama to announce new executive action on guns - CNNPolitics.com

GOOD. Why is it conservatives in other countries actually work towards limiting gun violence, instead of just enabling it? They don't hide behind pretense and keep fueling the fire, they actually work towards limiting gun violence. Enough of this pandering to gun owners.

nobody is pandering to gun owners. the 2nd amendment speaks loud and clear dear. you want to end "gun" violence. start LOCKING up the people who use's a gun for their violent behavior and CRIMES. Millions of legal gun owner NEVER commit a crime with the guns their own. but you all don't mind that their rights be stepped on because of the people who is actually committing the GUN VIOLENCE.
How about we call for ending the violence against the unborn and ban abortions while we are into stomping on people's rights.

 

[Stephanie]

I don't know what is so hard to understand about WHY THIS government want to get so called, gun control over the people in this country. good grief wake the hell up

snip:
Nazi Regulations against Jews Possessing Firearms
Posted on December 18, 2012 by Gary DeMar filed under Constitution,

Shooting Underscores Threat to ‘Soft Targets’”:

“In addition to schools and shopping malls, other soft targets include high-profile businesses, hotels, casinos, transportation facilities, airports and venues where there may be large audiences, such as theaters.”

My wife and I went to see a movie last night. I took a gun with me. I watched every person who came in. I checked the exits. We took aisle seats.

Consider what happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany. These laws left Jews defenseless against unspeakable evil:

A Gun Control Law Passed by the German Government One Day after Kristallnacht (November 11, 1938):

ALL OF IT here
Read more at Nazi Regulations against Jews Possessing Firearms

 

[IsaacNewton]

We knew this would be coming.

Obama to announce new executive action on guns

CNN)President Barack Obama is expected to announce in the coming days a new executive action with the goal of expanding background checks on gun sales, people familiar with White House planning said.

Described as "imminent," the set of executive actions would fulfill a promise by the President to take further unilateral steps the White House says could help curb gun deaths.

Plans for the action are not yet complete, and those familiar with the process warn that unforeseen circumstances could delay an announcement. But gun control advocates are expecting the new actions to be revealed next week, ahead of Obama's annual State of the Union address, set for January 12.

The White House wouldn't comment directly on the exact timing or content of Obama's executive orders. White House spokesman Eric Schultz said that the President expected a set of recommendations on unilateral action to arrive at the beginning of the year.

He said Obama was "expressing urgency" for a list of steps he can take on his own after high-profile incidents of gun violence at the end of this year.

"It is complicated. That's why it's taken some time for our policy folks, our lawyers, and our expects to work through this and see what's possible," Schultz said.

Gun control advocates and White House officials say the focus remains on the so-called "gun show loophole," which allows certain sellers of guns -- at gun shows and elsewhere -- to avoid conducting background checks before making sales.

Months after the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school massacre that claimed 26 victims, the then-Democratic majority Senate rejected a similar proposal.

Congress would still need to act in order to make background checks fully universal. But advocates and administration lawyers have struck upon a provision in the law that could allow for Obama to expand the background check requirement to additional sellers.

Federal law currently requires all individuals "engaged in the business" of selling guns to obtain a license and conduct background checks on buyers. But others who only make occasional sales or are selling firearms from a personal collection are exempted from the background check requirement.

Gun control advocates say Obama could take action himself by issuing a regulation that provides expanded guidance on who falls under the "in the business" standard.

One group, the Michael Bloomberg-helmed Everytown for Gun Safety, has provided recommendations to the White House that include creating a test for assessing who must become licensed to continue selling guns. Factors would include volume and speed of sales, and whether or not the seller relies on advertising to sell guns.

The group also recommended Obama define a gun in a "personal collection" as having been in the seller's possession for at least a year.

Before leaving for his winter vacation in Hawaii, Obama met with Bloomberg at the White House to discuss gun control.

Aside from the background check provision, people familiar with Obama's plans say his new gun control announcement will include new funding for government agencies to better enforce existing gun laws.



Promoted Stories

Obama to announce new executive action on guns - CNNPolitics.com

The current president has issued 227 Executive orders.

Ronald The Criminal Reagan issued 381. G W Bush issued 291.

Oh the fake outrage!!!

 

[Indofred]

What you don't know is that what you and your idiot president plan to do won't save a single life

Not my president, and I don't much like him, but he has this right.
You, on the other hand, have it wrong.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/03/us/how-mass-shooters-got-their-guns.html?_r=0

The vast majority of guns used in 15 recent mass shootings, including at least two of the guns used in the San Bernardino attack, were bought legally and with a federal background check. At least eight gunmen had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that did not prevent them from obtaining their weapons.

New. stronger checks will help prevent many or most of the massive gun mass murders you see in the US.
Of course, the NRA and its dodgy pals don't want any gun control at all because when the US public realise the truth, they'll eventually force votes to dump the lot - and that's a lot of lost profit.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Barack Hussein Obama, you miserable disgusting traitor, I will not comply. Go fuck yourself.

The good news is, this lowlife won't be around much longer.

Amen to that!

 

[Stephanie]

What you don't know is that what you and your idiot president plan to do won't save a single life

Not my president, and I don't much like him, but he has this right.
You, on the other hand, have it wrong.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/03/us/how-mass-shooters-got-their-guns.html?_r=0

The vast majority of guns used in 15 recent mass shootings, including at least two of the guns used in the San Bernardino attack, were bought legally and with a federal background check. At least eight gunmen had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that did not prevent them from obtaining their weapons.

New. stronger checks will help prevent many or most of the massive gun mass murders you see in the US.
Of course, the NRA and its dodgy pals don't want any gun control at all because when the US public realise the truth, they'll eventually force votes to dump the lot - and that's a lot of lost profit.

omg, the nyslimes. The paper of pure propaganda, mixed with a bunch hyped bs. please.

NO LAW will stop your people fixation on gun violence. as if the GUN is going out on it's own to cause all this mayhem and violence. how about taking the criminals off the streets then they can't go buy a gun. sounds to rational or something?

 

[JimBowie1958]

"dude". You need to learn your place, respond to me by using "Sir" or "Mr. Catcher". Your opinion is worthless when it is offered in the context of an historical document and framed by an ad hominem.

Limit you opinions to subjective fact, such as, "it's warm in here" or "I'm hungry". I will respond to the latter with, "Well Mr. Hungry, what would you like eat?"

Opinions on the meaning of many sections of COTUS are legit, if one frames them with the Art. Sec. and Clause, for many are ambiguous, and easily spun to fit one's agenda.

lol