BREAKING: Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate

[Markle]

Pelosi is not in charge of Capitol security.

Who elects the Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives?

 

[Marener]

Who elects the Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives?

The House Sergeant at Arms doesnt run capitol security either.

 

[Markle]

Distinction without a difference. They are both contributors to the economy. I have a hard time looking down on people who are fleeing violence and poverty.

That's all fine and dandy, BUT by the end of President Biden's first term, he will have allowed over 12 million illegal aliens to enter our country. That's more than the state of Ohio. We have no clue as to who they are, where they are, what criminal record they have, what diseases they have. How does that help America?

 

[Markle]

The House Sergeant at Arms doesnt run capitol security either.

The sergeant at arms is also responsible for ensuring the safety and security of members of Congress, the congressional staff, visiting dignitaries, and tourists. Toward this end, the sergeant at arms works in concert with the Senate sergeant at arms and the Architect of the Capitol. These three officials, along with the chief of the Capitol Police ex officio, comprise the Capitol Police Board.

 

[Markle]

That's not it. Data shows that immigrants contribute a ton to the economy. Perhaps you see dark skinned people and assume they’re all on welfare.

The Cost of Illegal Immigration to the United States​

At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $182 billion to cover the costs incurred from the presence of more than 15.5 million illegal aliens, and about 5.4 million citizen children of illegal aliens. That amounts to a cost burden of approximately $8,776 per illegal alien/citizen child. The burden of illegal immigration on U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling, with the gross cost per taxpayer at $1,156 every year.

Illegal aliens only contribute roughly $32 billion in taxes at the state, local, and federal levels. This means that the net fiscal cost of illegal immigration to taxpayers totals approximately $150.7 billion.

The Cost of Illegal Immigration to American Taxpayers 2023

The fiscal burden of providing essential services and benefits to illegal aliens costs American taxpayers nearly $151 billion each year.

www.fairus.org

 

[martybegan]

And you still won’t admit that removing illegal immigrants from this country is probably impossible and extremely detrimental to the economy.

Not to mention highly inflationary.

It's not impossible, Dems just don't want to do it.

 

[martybegan]

You mad bro?

good.

You fake bro?

Figures.

 

[Marener]

That's all fine and dandy, BUT by the end of President Biden's first term, he will have allowed over 12 million illegal aliens to enter our country. That's more than the state of Ohio. We have no clue as to who they are, where they are, what criminal record they have, what diseases they have. How does that help America?

Basically none of that is true and represents a profound misreading of the data.

 

[martybegan]

No they don’t. They oppose each other. One tells us what they wrote. The other pretends to know what they wanted to write but didn’t actually write.

Plessy was based on originalism. The judges claimed that the authors didn’t intend to require integration.

Brown was much more based on liberal judicial philosophy that we have to interpret the constitution in a way that makes sense for the betterment of the country.

Based on what they wrote at the time, not what they think they could have thought of in modern times.

The amendment process handles that, not justices fucking around like Plessey and Roe.

Plessey was based on the same wishful thinking of Roe, that deciding an issue makes it go away.

Brown was based on originalism of the writers intent of the 14th amendment, originalism takes into account that amendments weren't all written in the 1700's,

 

[martybegan]

She was in the middle of a blunt force attack to breach the last barricade to the sheltering lawmakers. She was foaming at the mouth with hatred for those Congressmen and or Congresswomen whom she was trying to capture and use as hostages. Not sure why she thought she had a right to do that ......

She was hanging through the window, and please show me photographs of her "foaming at the mouth".

Her, not someone near her or 500 feet away from her.

 

[Marener]

It's not impossible, Dems just don't want to do it.

Given it would seriously harm the economy, of course not. It’s a stupid idea.

But yeah, it is still pretty impossible.

You set an impossible condition because you don’t really want legal immigration either.

And for what? What’s your goal here? Make the economy suffer? Or just to keep a certain demographic relevance?

 

[1miseryindex]

Why was she dumb? Because she didn’t heed the law enforcement officer’s commands and the officer perceived her to be a threat so he opened fire?

Based on your criteria, Michael Brown and other Blacks who got shot by police officers for not heeding an officer’s commands or perceived to be a threat to the officer were dumb as well.

LOL

excellent point.. but wasted as always on people NOT listening, fingers plugged tightly into ears (as they toke on their joints and sip their beers....)

 

[martybegan]

Given it would seriously harm the economy, of course not. It’s a stupid idea.

But yeah, it is still pretty impossible.

You set an impossible condition because you don’t really want legal immigration either.

And for what? What’s your goal here? Make the economy suffer? Or just to keep a certain demographic relevance?

They broke the law, they get to go home. On us.

Give them $100 American each when they land, that should last them a few weeks at least.

 

[1miseryindex]

She is breaking and entering. She is the criminal.

She was UNARMED

what a coward / bully who killed her.

They are nothing but treasonous traitors. A criminal sues the government. I would sue Judicial Watch for everything they own. This is ridiculous.

You are ridiculous

If you only knew HOW ridiculous

 

[Marener]

Based on what they wrote at the time, not what they think they could have thought of in modern times.

The amendment process handles that, not justices fucking around like Plessey and Roe.

Plessey was based on the same wishful thinking of Roe, that deciding an issue makes it go away.

Brown was based on originalism of the writers intent of the 14th amendment, originalism takes into account that amendments weren't all written in the 1700's,

Brown wasn’t based on any writings by any author at the time. It was because segregation was bad and harmful to the country so they got rid of it.

There was nothing originalist about Brown.

Plessy was different. They said that the authors surely never intended the 14th amendment to be interpreted to have such a widespread effect. It’s exactly like when you complain that liberals are overextending interpretations of the constitution to cover our own policy agenda and “forcing” things on the country. That’s the kind of philosophy that brought us Plessy. You just don't realize it.

 

[martybegan]

Brown wasn’t based on any writings by any author at the time. It was because segregation was bad and harmful to the country so they got rid of it.

There was nothing originalist about Brown.

Plessy was different. They said that the authors surely never intended the 14th amendment to be interpreted to have such a widespread effect. It’s exactly like when you complain that liberals are overextending interpretations of the constitution to cover our own policy agenda and “forcing” things on the country. That’s the kind of philosophy that brought us Plessy. You just don't realize it.

It reversed the shit decision of Plessey.

 

[Marener]

They broke the law, they get to go home. On us.

Give them $100 American each when they land, that should last them a few weeks at least.

Which has nothing to do with what’s good for the country.

 

[Marener]

It reversed the shit decision of Plessey.

And if you had been around at the time, you would have been opposed to such an expansive interpretation of the 14th amendment.

So would the majority of your favorite conservative justices. Alito would have never signed on to it. I can guarantee that.

 

[candycorn]

You fake bro?

Figures.

306>232.

Authentic ass kicking!!!

You mad bro?

 

[Markle]

Basically none of that is true and represents a profound misreading of the data.

Prove it!