Sorry snowflake. It did. And our major intelligence agencies said so.LOL, no it didn't happen.
I would just deal with it.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry snowflake. It did. And our major intelligence agencies said so.LOL, no it didn't happen.
The lies were exposed practially every night by some HostI know, right? As much as they tried to defend their Russia collusion fraud. Durham exposed their lies.
Oh you mean like Obama did in Egypt when the Muslim brotherhood took over the presidency until the Egyptian military ended that bull shite ? Cry me a river with your hypocritical tears.How did he show that?
He admitted under questioning that Russia did seek to influence our 2016 election in favor of the former 1-term fuckup.
Are being retarded on purpose? The point of this was to find out the truth about "Russia collusion"Durham prosecuted what crime successfully?
Well, Chatbot, you’re not willing to acknowledge that the corrupt, Dem / Marxist controlled FBI and DOJ flunkies are going to do what is necessary to obstruct any evidence that might be presented to a Grand Jury.
"People get phone calls all the time from individuals who claim to have information like that," Durham said, dismissing the situation.Bullshit.
Dumbass"People get phone calls all the time from individuals who claim to have information like that," Durham said, dismissing the situation.
"Are you really trying to diminish the importance of what happened here?" Schiff asked in response, surprised that Durham found the meeting, which indicated to Moscow that Trump's camp was receptive to Russian election intervention, unimportant.
"The more complete story is that they met, and it was a ruse, and they didn't talk about Mrs. Clinton," Durham answered, repeating a claim from the Trump camp when the meeting was revealed in 2017."
"But the report from special counsel Robert Mueller indicates that the Russian Counsel, lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, did discuss Clinton. According to the report, Veselnitskaya had stated the Ziff brothers, owners of an American family investment broke Russian laws and donated profits to the Clinton Campaign or the DNC even though no evidence of wrongdoing was found. She also claimed the firm had participated in tax evasion and money laundering in both the U.S. and Russia."
![]()
Legal experts: John Durham made false statements to Congress about Trump-Russia probe
"In a just world, Durham would be investigated," says Harvard Law Prof. Laurence Tribenews.yahoo.com
Well actually, Chatbot, the Grand Jury didn’t get to see evidence buried by the Corrupt Dem / Marxist Biden lackeys.What evidence didn't the GJ get to not see, Chatbot?
There's an old saying in the law, that you can get a Grand Jury to indict a Ham Sandwich, but there has to be some meat on the sandwich.
Smokescreen. The Russian hoax has been exposed. You're too late."People get phone calls all the time from individuals who claim to have information like that," Durham said, dismissing the situation.
"Are you really trying to diminish the importance of what happened here?" Schiff asked in response, surprised that Durham found the meeting, which indicated to Moscow that Trump's camp was receptive to Russian election intervention, unimportant.
"The more complete story is that they met, and it was a ruse, and they didn't talk about Mrs. Clinton," Durham answered, repeating a claim from the Trump camp when the meeting was revealed in 2017."
"But the report from special counsel Robert Mueller indicates that the Russian Counsel, lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, did discuss Clinton. According to the report, Veselnitskaya had stated the Ziff brothers, owners of an American family investment broke Russian laws and donated profits to the Clinton Campaign or the DNC even though no evidence of wrongdoing was found. She also claimed the firm had participated in tax evasion and money laundering in both the U.S. and Russia."
![]()
Legal experts: John Durham made false statements to Congress about Trump-Russia probe
"In a just world, Durham would be investigated," says Harvard Law Prof. Laurence Tribenews.yahoo.com
Just like what a Marxist socialist deep state 2023 Democrat would say, otherwise violate Americans right to privacy without producing a warrant or without probable cause eh... So you aren't a young person of the sixties are you ? No, because at least they believed more in being anti-big government/anti-big brother after what the government done to them during Vietnam.I think we need to subpoena the texts of every Republican in Congress and their staffers and we'd find out just how many of them were horrified at the notion of Trump as their nominee.
That didn't show Trump colluded....Just like Mueller said.How did he show that?
He admitted under questioning that Russia did seek to influence our 2016 election in favor of the former 1-term fuckup.
Oh please....examples.Durham may go down for lying to Congress.
Source : His assOh please....examples.
Source : His ass
The Mueller Report didn’t state that. It stated it couldn’t reach a conclusion because of administration stonewalling.That didn't show Trump colluded....Just like Mueller said.