Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
still see; local mirrorstill an idiot
So you imagine the appellate ruling is going to be favorable to Trump?
Who embarrassed her then? That's your claim buddy but you don't have much to back it up.still see; local mirror
Reading comprehension, is your friend. Learn to apply it!
I never once said here, at all, if I had an opinion on the appellate issue nor its ruling. You ain't slick. We are not talking about the ruling here nor the appellate issue. We are talking about a TDS patient, overzealous, judge DNChutkan being now embarrassed into walking back that trial date.
You are very dishonest here again. E. Jean Carroll did not get anybody. Her atty did, and had help from anti-Trump judge. Plus it was a civil case --which is AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LEGAL STANDARD OF CONVICTION-- than used in criminal court cases.E Jean Carroll just got him and she isn't even a prosecutor. Don't you worry. You're going to be seeing a lot of Trump getting got this year.
You dingleberry, no "who?" embarrassed her here.Who embarrassed her then?
Nope. I can't take credit for that one pal. It all goes to judge DNChutkan --for embarrassing HERSELF without any one's help.That's your claim buddy
Don't worry. With the D.C. case getting delayed a couple months that leaves time for N.Y. to try their criminal fraud case against Trump.You are very dishonest here again. E. Jean Carroll did not get anybody. Her atty did, and had help from anti-Trump judge. Plus it was a civil case --which is AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LEGAL STANDARD OF CONVICTION-- than used in criminal court cases.
Stop being do deceitful, and please do try to help defeat Trump with your honesty sometimes.
What's embarrassing about moving a trail because of an unforeseeable delay?You dingleberry, no "who?" embarrassed her here.
'Tis the Act, that has embarrassed her.
hehe
The Act, of vacating the trial date.
Nope. I can't take credit for that one pal. It all goes to judge DNChutkan --for embarrassing HERSELF without any one's help.
Don't worry. With the D.C. case getting delayed a couple months that leaves time for
There's no egg. There's a lot of feverish white wing fantasy that will dissipate rather quickly after the appellate ruling and the trial gets back up and running.Nope. Wrong answer.
You were supposed to stay, on topic, and speak truth to the eggyolk left on your face and on DNChutkan's face now. Thanks to how the 64K pages per day, was proof LAST YEAR, that judge DNChutkan knew this was an unreasonable trial date on very the day she set it.
The lawsuit against Trump was originally scheduled for March 4, 2024 before Super Tuesday.
This is a huge blow to radical Obama Judge Tanya Chatkun and the Marxist horde in America.
BREAKING: Trump Election Interference Case in Washington DC Has Been Removed from Court Calendar - Postponed Indefinitely | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
According to several reports the Trump election interference case in Washington DC has been removed from the court calendar.www.thegatewaypundit.com
There's no egg. There's a lot of feverish white wing fantasy that will dissipate rather quickly after the appellate ruling and the trial gets back up and running.
and you know exxxxxxxactly why that news of 'no March 2024 trial' cuts the 70-million anti-Trump voters sooo deep
That's your stupid premise but you can't connect her pausing the trial with any appeal for extra time. The case was paused for an appeal on absolute immunity. It's a matter of public record you moron.Nope. The ruling is not the issue here. But hey, keep playing pretend.
This is about an overzealous, TDS patient, judge DNChutkan setting an unreasonable March 2024 trial date. And, she got exposed. So now she has to vacate that trial date
hehe
No you dipshit. She's just waiting for the Appellate court to rule on whether Trump has absolute immunity. That ruling should be coming any day now. The question is whether the Appellate court lifts the stay or keeps it as it makes its way to the Supreme Court. All in all it probably won't get started until May or August now with the delays.
The case was paused for an appeal
No March 2024 trial start = not possible for trial to be over with a verdict --before November's election day! Which means... if Trump wins, he gets to pardon himself no matter what any Dem witchhunt trial concludes with
You are not getting away with being here, PRETENDING, you do not know why that March 2024 date she set was sooo vital to your anti-Trumpists.
You. Are. Not. Slick!
Shouting
dumb Bingo.
WinningThe lawsuit against Trump was originally scheduled for March 4, 2024 before Super Tuesday.
This is a huge blow to radical Obama Judge Tanya Chatkun and the Marxist horde in America.
BREAKING: Trump Election Interference Case in Washington DC Has Been Removed from Court Calendar - Postponed Indefinitely | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
According to several reports the Trump election interference case in Washington DC has been removed from the court calendar.
Not with 91 felony counts and prosecutors lining up to take a shot at him. If the D.C. case isn't going in March then the N.Y. criminal fraud trial will and if it's still delayed after that Fani Willis will push her Georgia Rico prosecution to the front of the line. Trump is going to be spending a lot of 2024 in court.Winning
In case you didn't notice they are all falling apart.Not with 91 felony counts and prosecutors lining up to take a shot at him. If the D.C. case isn't going in March then the N.Y. criminal fraud trial will and if it's still delayed after that Fani Willis will push her Georgia Rico prosecution to the front of the line. Trump is going to be spending a lot of 2024 in court.
I noticed a lot of ignorant MAGAt noise about them falling apart but MAGAt predictions in Courts of law rarely work out, don't they?In case you didn't notice they are all falling apart.
Sheep you're in denial that's winning.I noticed a lot of ignorant MAGAt noise about them falling apart but MAGAt predictions in Courts of law rarely work out, don't they?
