Breaking: Hillary's Homosexual Campaign Manager, Robby Mook, Confirms He Knew About Wiretaps

[theHawk]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

 

[RodISHI]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

People in denial don't wanna 'wake up and smell the corruption'.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Mook is squealing. Hillary should have never screamed and threw things at him on election night when she found out she lost to Trump causing him to go into hiding avoiding interviews.

 

[owebo]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

What did Obama know? And when did Obama know it?

 

[Smedley VonBuren]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

Hillary slapped him around during her election night melt down

 

[The Original Tree]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

Why would Sig Blumenthal be given classified information by Hillary Clinton which ended up in the hands of terrorists causing Benghazi weapons dump to be attacked?

And when will THE DNC, Obama, and Clinton be held accountable for their multiple felonies and misdemeanors?

Hillary Clinton though should have faced a firing squad for multiple violations of The Espionage Act.
I would have been ok with Life Imprisonment.

 

[mudwhistle]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

Yeah....but they were only spying on Russians from their end. Sorry that it was just the Trump campaign's conversations that were leaked. Totally innocent. Nothing to see here. These are not the Droids you are looking for. Move along.

 

[dannyboys]

No reason to wiretap trump. He puts all his insane lies and incoherent rantings on Twitter. He has No proof but is attempting to deflect from his Russian woes. The man is crazed.

Permanent Ignore. We don't need any more sock puppets here.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Hillary's campaign manager isn't the only homosexual mentioned in this sentence.

 

[The Original Tree]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

The same Lefty Scum is now compromising our Intelligence Community through Wikileaks.
In fact, both Snowden and Manning were Lefty Dems when they committed their crimes.

And let's look at Russian Hacking accusations. The FBI and Clapper "Obama's Intelligence Chief" both said there was no collusion by The Trump Team with Russia what so ever to attempt to interfere in our elections.

Then you have the DNC who was embarrassed by The Podesta Leaks....they were leaks...not hacks....and it was they who claimed their server was hacked by Russians. They claimed Hillary Clinton's Unsecured Server was never hacked...impossible they said....but a much more secure server in THE DNC server was hacked....

ACCORDING TO THEM....and THEM ONLY. Not one person has been allowed to look at THE DNC SERVER. Not even THE FBI.

The Russian Hacking story was a lie. That lie was used as justification to wire tap The Trump Campaign, and impact The Election.

The Dems ARE THE RUSSIANS. They rigged their own primaries. They illegally registered illegals to vote. They paid thugs to riot in the streets and attack Trump Supporters and intimidate voters, break shop windows, vandalize police cruisers, and even commit acts of violence against Law Enforcement.

The only party trying to illegally impact the results of our election was The Democrat Party.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

She's repeatedly been careless where she shouldn't have been. I think her drinking problem has really taken a toll.

She would have never survived her first term due to her declining health.

If you are talking about mental health I agree. The physical health issues were overplayed in order to cause Trump to pity her and think it not necessary to dig in as hard at debates. Hillary brought it up herself when she told him during 1st debate you didn't think I'd be prepared but I am! That says a lot about her, that she stooped to feigning sickness in front of the public eye for sympathy because she knows the American people cannot stand her.

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote? NOT ON YOUR LIFE. No, she didn't - and Trump knows it.

Hillary couldn't even win Michigan, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin which were supposedly a done deal. She lost before Nov. 8th ever rolled around. Let's face it, she is not electable. I said it before and I will say it again, she isn't electable. She's one of the worst, most inept politicians in American history. The only thing she accomplished was getting away with breaking the law - thanks to her husband.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Back on topic. So now the big question is how was Robby Mook, a civilian, aware of FISA court authorized top secret wiretaps that only high level intelligence officials would only be privy of, unless it was done illegally?

 

[bodecea]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

Gateway Pundit......

 

[bodecea]

Back on topic. So now the big question is how was Robby Mook, a civilian, aware of FISA court authorized top secret wiretaps that only high level intelligence officials would only be privy of, unless it was done illegally?

No, the big question is how are you so gullible?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Back on topic. So now tuow was Robby Mook, a civilian, aware of FISA court authorized top secret wiretaps that only high level intelligence officials would only be privy of, unless it was done illegally?

No, the big question is how are you so gullible?

Answer the question! How was Robby Mook, a civilian, aware of FISA court authorized top secret wiretaps that only high level intelligence officials would only be privy of, unless it was done illegally?

 

[Slade3200]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

How are you not understanding this? Russian ambassador was tapped, not Flynn. Flynn called the ambassador. The fact that they spoke was illegally leaked by intel or White House to expose the lie.

 

[theHawk]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

How are you not understanding this? Russian ambassador was tapped, not Flynn. Flynn called the ambassador. The fact that they spoke was illegally leaked by intel or White House to expose the lie.

You are the one that doesn't understand. A FISA wiretap on a Russian cannot be used against an American. Use of that was a felony, no one should had been allowed to even listen to the conversation when an American was identified, much less pass it around and leak it. It's a complete abuse of power. It also proves that Intel was being gathered on Trump associates and being passed around to the White House, as the NYT said. So how is Trump "lying" if it's already happened and the NYT has confirmed it?

 

[Slade3200]

Why would civilian Robby Mook be privileged to this top secret information?

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-clintons-campaign-manager-robby-mook-confirms-knew-wiretaps-video/

It's so hilarious to watch the liberals spin this shit.

First they decry Trump and conservatives are "fabricating" the story and claiming there is no "proof" of wiretapping of Trump and his staff.

Yet Flynn was being tapped, and it was illegally leaked in order to destroy him.

Then they change their tune and say it's the Russians being targeted. Then they change their tune again and say it was legal, there was a judge approving it.

Flynn wasn't tapped, the Russian ambassador was tapped and Flynn called the Ambassador. Flynn then lied about it to Pence who then spread the falsehood to the public. intelligence reported to Trump about Flynms lie and Trump did nothing about it so somebody from either the White House or the intelligence agency illegally leaked the story to the press.

There is no evidence to back up Trumps tweet or the WH would present it. It's was likely and emotional reaction from Trump to detract from the session fiasco.

That's the unspun version. It's called truth, soak it in.

When Flynn was being recorded when speaking with a Russian ambassador, the law says that recording should be compounded and not used, since Flynn is American and the FISA tap cannot be used on an American. It was leaked illegally, Rep. Jim Himes (D) even agrees with that.

Clapper went on NBC and stated emphatically that there was no authority through FISA to wiretap Trump or his staff.
Yet the New York Times reported many times that Trump staff was being "investigated" for connections to Russia, and that no evidence of collusion was ever found in relation to Russian "hacking".

Here's the NYT article:
"The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said."

As you can see, the NYT clearly says that at least four separate agencies were "investigating" Trump.

The beginning of the article opens:

"WASHINGTON — American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said."

Excuse me? A "broad investigation" against Trump for "possible links" to Russia? What crime was ever committed that warranted a "broad investigation"?

Then there is this little part:

"One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House."

Oh my, the NYT is reporting that wiretapped communications was provided to the White House.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html

So, was Clapper lying when he said there was no authorization for wiretaps?
If he wasn't lying, that means they never had FISA authority to do wiretaps.

If it was the FBI, what crime was committed to warrant an investigation and where is the warrant to tap an American citizen?

So if they didn't have the authority to do the wiretaps, yet the NYT knows they did and provided information from those taps to the White House, then what authority was there to wiretap anyone on Trump's staff?

The answer is none, subverts in the intel community did it illegally and provided the information gathered from the wiretaps to the media and the White House for political purposes.

Wake up and smell the corruption.

How are you not understanding this? Russian ambassador was tapped, not Flynn. Flynn called the ambassador. The fact that they spoke was illegally leaked by intel or White House to expose the lie.

You are the one that doesn't understand. A FISA wiretap on a Russian cannot be used against an American. Use of that was a felony, no one should had been allowed to even listen to the conversation when an American was identified, much less pass it around and leak it. It's a complete abuse of power. It also proves that Intel was being gathered on Trump associates and being passed around to the White House, as the NYT said. So how is Trump "lying" if it's already happened and the NYT has confirmed it?

I said twice that the leak was illegal. You all are spreading the lie that The tap was on Flynn. And he DID lie and get fired for it btw let's not forgot about that