nah, eggs have been vindicated.
It's the offensive on the carbs which is fashinable nowadays
So
, let me be the first to predict a new scientific study within a year or so, proving that eggs are bad for you. And sugar and milk and bread, depending on where and how they are classified today.
And let me go out on the limb and include carbs. Just a matter of time and/or how desperately the scientist needs funds to condemn the food of his choice.
Scientists, whose occupation appears to be nothing more than condemning/vindicating foods, depending how the wind blows, here is a hint: It has been a long time since tomatoes have been called poison.
Ain't it time to release your wisdom on the unwashed, regarding this vegetable, which you define as fruit?
you are too late. that has been the early 90s
there is science and science.
believe me, I know how to read the studies.
And I always considered this BS about cholesterol in food to be exactly that - BS. because we synthesize it 24/7 and the one from outside does not matter.
Same is with carbs, eggs or HRT - another BS.
One has to actually READ the studies in question and look at those the way one is supposed to.
I could tell you a lot of stories including research BS.
However, let's not throw the baby with the bath water.
Scientists and researchers are human, therefore all human sins are present in the field.
But it is not all of those and there are ways to judge it for it's merits - if one knows what to look for.
transfats are simply not needed in the human diet. artificial ones. the ones which are the subject of FDA regulation.
I honestly do not see any reason for so many emotions here.
Why won't you guys feel stymied when FDA blackboxed droperidol

- it is much more corrupted situation, but nobody ever heard of it in general public, right?