I'll tell you what difference it makes. I won't miss trans fat at all because I avoid it as much as possible. But the fact that the government chooses to ban it, not because it is a poisonous or toxic substance or harmful in small amounts, but because they just want to ban it because somebody might eat too much of it and they can.
And where does that stop? Why not regulate salt? Sugar? Refined flour? And all the other stuff that is bad for us if we consume too much of it? Where do you draw the line on what the government will be allowed to do to dictate every aspect of your life?
Remember. Kathleen Sebelius is in charge of Health and Human Services with authority to ban whatever. How is her track record so far with that agency?
The FDA commissioner is Margaret Hamburg MD who really doesn't appear to be a bad choice. But Kathleen Sebelius is her boss. I would be much happier of Hamburg was head of Health and Human Services but alas, she simply didn't pull the political clout that Sebelius had.
The Deputy Commissioner of the FDA is former Monsanto VP and head lobbyist Michael Taylor. Does that inspire a great deal of confidence folks?
Definitely not, Fox. I signed that petition long ago protesting that appointment and have railed about it here. But that doesn't mean any particular action, taken by itself, is tainted.
And again as noted earlier, what you're calling a "ban" would be simply the removal from the GRAS list, which would subject said additives to the food additive tolerance requirements established by the FFDCA, from which, by presence on the GRAS list, they are now exempt. Naturally they wouldn't pass that test, nor should they, since neither the FDA nor you nor me nor anyone that's commented here sees no value in them whatsoever, while plenty of harm has been demonstrated.
And again Foxy - the GRAS list has been protecting our foods since
1958, and the federal government was screening for dangerous ingredients in the public food supplies over a hundred years before that -- so how come all of a sudden we're jumping up and down for the right to be poisoned NOW? Doesn't make any sense.
From the FDA
press release:
>> "One of the FDA’s core regulatory functions is ensuring that food, including all substances added to food, is safe,” said Michael Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine. “Food manufacturers have voluntarily decreased trans fat levels in many foods in recent years, but a substantial number of products still contain partially hydrogenated oils, which are the major source of trans fat in processed food.”
Following a review of the submitted comments, if the FDA finalizes its preliminary determination, PHOs would be considered “food additives” and could not be used in food unless authorized by regulation. If such a determination were made, the agency would provide adequate time for producers to reformulate products in order to minimize market disruption. The FDA’s preliminary determination is only with regard to PHOs and does not affect trans fat that naturally occurs in small amounts in certain meat and dairy products. << (PHOs = 'partially hydrogenated oils')