Breaking! FBI Formally Refuses To Hand Over Biden Document To Oversight Committee --- Chris Wray To Be Held In Contempt

[Godboy]

Who said anything about official whistleblowers? Conservatives are calling everyone a whistleblower these days, they don’t know anything about official status.

The process requires lawyers for each whistleblower and certain protocols that they have to follow. Each of them are members of the FBI and none of them have any reason to lie, in fact merely telling the truth ends their career, so they are sacrificing a lot to blow the whistle. There is zero reason to believe they are lying, nor has anyone suggested they are lying. They were either pulled off the case or they werent. That can easily be proven.

 

[Marener]

The process requires lawyers for each whistleblower and certain protocols that they have to follow. Each of them are members of the FBI and none of them have any reason to lie, in fact merely telling the truth ends their career, so they are sacrificing a lot to blow the whistle.

Just because you call them a whistleblower doesn’t mean they are one. I have seen little to no evidence to show they’ve been deemed actual whistleblowers. The conservative press just throws the word around without caring about the process.

These supposed whistleblowers aren’t per se lying but giving opinions and injecting their personal judgement which is problematic when they demonstrate a conservative bias.

Ask yourself what the supposed whistleblower in the OP’s story is blowing a whistle on. A document about an allegation about Biden. How is that blowing a whistle?

 

[Staidhup]

Lock the son of a bitch up! He is employed by the people not his handlers, we the people pay his salary.

 

[Godboy]

Just because you call them a whistleblower doesn’t mean they are one. I have seen little to no evidence to show they’ve been deemed actual whistleblowers. The conservative press just throws the word around without caring about the process.

These supposed whistleblowers aren’t per se lying but giving opinions and injecting their personal judgement which is problematic when they demonstrate a conservative bias.

Ask yourself what the supposed whistleblower in the OP’s story is blowing a whistle on. A document about an allegation about Biden. How is that blowing a whistle?

They are pointing to a pattern. Whats great about this pattern is, we can take what they say, look into the documentation of what took place and why they were removed from investigations. If they were removed and no one else was investigating after them, then we have collusion to hide a crime.

The same goes for bank records. Each bank we subpoena leads to new evidence. Whats great about this is they just have to look at when Biden flew to these countries, then look to see if he was paid soon after he left. Guess what, thats what they have found in 4 different countries so far. Its the same thing every time, he flies on Airforce2 to a corrupt nation to conduct foreign affairs, he signs a deal where the US pays that nation a bunch of money, then soon after his family gets money from that corrupt nation. The payments from all these corrupt sources stop coming in immediately after he leaves office. It is crushing evidence that no one on trial would want a jury to base their verdict on.