Breaking : At 10:10 PM Judge Batten RE-ISSUED the Restraining Order !

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
47,206
Reaction score
6,631
Points
1,870
Take my word for it

as soon as we are through with REAL RECOUNTS he is going to exceed 80,000,000
But you have been wrong every time, consistently, since election day. You have been embarrassed at every turn. You have been consistently embarrassed as you back every bit of nonsense and lawsuit that has appeared. Your "word" is mud.
 

alpine

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
3,535
Reaction score
801
Points
130
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?

This was not intended for you.


Go back to fellating Biden


.
Who was it intended for?

For those proud patriots - the 80,000,000 who voted for Donald J Trump


.
Well, the left doesn’t care. Why would we care this information was spared if we already feel the election was fair?

You KNOW that it wasn't fair -

You just want Biden to win

You pea-sized brain is to small to understand the ramifications of what is going on

If Wonder Woman - the Honorable Sidney Powell - allows the powers-that-be to get away with murder we will NEVER have honest elections again

N-E-V-E-R


.
Lol I mean really you should pleased with what I am saying but you’re just pissed because you want me to say “how dare he! All of that must be destroyed!”
not to mention, we are all in for investigation of voter fraud...

it is impossible for donald to score 70+mil votes in any sane election...

i bet half of them are like these brain dead lunatics voting for him, which is (if not should be) illegal... :)
 

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
44,572
Reaction score
9,155
Points
2,040
Location
The Land of Sanctuary
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?
Those who are afraid are those that don't care.
 

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,842
Reaction score
5,884
Points
290
Location
Colorado
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?
Those who are afraid are those that don't care.
lol what?
 

keepitreal

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
6,649
Reaction score
2,927
Points
1,060
Location
Chiraq
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?

This was not intended for you.


Go back to fellating Biden


.
Who was it intended for?

For those proud patriots - the 80,000,000 who voted for Donald J Trump


.
Well, the left doesn’t care. Why would we care this information was spared if we already feel the election was fair?
Wow
 

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,842
Reaction score
5,884
Points
290
Location
Colorado
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?

This was not intended for you.


Go back to fellating Biden


.
Who was it intended for?

For those proud patriots - the 80,000,000 who voted for Donald J Trump


.
Well, the left doesn’t care. Why would we care this information was spared if we already feel the election was fair?
Wow
Is that wow?
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,460
Reaction score
15,779
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.

That's why we have paper trails....that were added in all the contentious states this year, and the absentee vote has ballots, hand written, circles filled out ballots, to compare to the machine votes tallied....

The hand recounts of paper ballots, match up with the machine tallies almost perfectly... in the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
157,779
Reaction score
21,920
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
One machine crashed and they had to replace it. The judge didn't order that though.
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH








Kyle Becker

@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
The company said it is impossible to alter votes since the voter gets a slip of paper from the machine which matches the voter's selection and is used in recounts both with the machine and the voter.
 

Grumblenuts

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
1,179
Points
140
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.

That's why we have paper trails....that were added in all the contentious states this year, and the absentee vote has ballots, hand written, circles filled out ballots, to compare to the machine votes tallied....

The hand recounts of paper ballots, match up with the machine tallies almost perfectly... in the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
Paper trails from voting machines? Not really. Matching "machine tallies" by "hand recount" means nothing. Absentee voting? Of course! Nothing can replace hand marked, hand counted paper balloting.
The new VSAP system is a touchscreen Ballot Marking Device or BMD, which prints out a computer-marked paper ballot summary of votes selected via the touchscreen, before using another computer, an optical-scanner, to read the non-human readable QR Code that is also printed on the ballot summary. The QR Codes are used to tally votes. While the QR Code (a type of barcode) cannot be verified for accuracy by voters, it is also impossible with such systems to know if any voter has even verified the human-readable portion of the ballot summary at all, much less correctly, after an election. Studies reveal that most do not verify computer-marked ballots at all, and that of the minority who do, most don't recall the details or selections on the ballot they voted just moments earlier. That's just one of the many reasons why most cybersecurity and voting systems experts warn against the use of such systems which are now proliferating --- and sometimes replacing verifiable hand-marked paper ballot systems --- in many states and counties across the country before 2020. (The list of states where counties or the entire state are moving to BMD systems include a number of key battleground states. Such systems are planned for use next year, or are already being used, in OH, WI, PA, TX, WV, KY, NY, NJ, KS, TN, IN, SC, NC and, yes, CA, unless the public prevents these plans.)
the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
GA (you can look up WI - SSDD):
The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have failed to implement a constitutionally acceptable election system by requiring all in-person voters to use a BMD system that, as a whole, in its design and operation, is not voter-verifiable, secure, or reliable. They contend this system. suffers from some of the same major cybersecurity vulnerabilities posed by Defendants’ deeply flawed, outdated Direct Recording Electronic (“DRE”) Voting System addressed by the Court’s lengthy Order of August 15, 2019 that granted injunctive relief.3 (Doc. 579.) Plaintiffs’ challenge embraces an array of associated issues involving the electronic voting process that impact if an individual’s vote (whether recorded from a scanned BMD-generated barcode or a hand-marked paper ballot) will be correctly captured, scanned, and accurately counted.4 Their claims thus also raise significant issues regarding the auditing of the election system’s voting results and ballot processing.
 

tyroneweaver

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
20,928
Reaction score
5,352
Points
280
Location
Burley, Idaho
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?

This was not intended for you.


Go back to fellating Biden


.
Who was it intended for?
ya mean you don't know......really
 

tyroneweaver

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
20,928
Reaction score
5,352
Points
280
Location
Burley, Idaho
One machine crashed and they had to replace it. The judge didn't order that though.
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
The company said it is impossible to alter votes since the voter gets a slip of paper from the machine which matches the voter's selection and is used in recounts both with the machine and the voter.
So the machine can detect a slip like a absentee ballot that was never mailed out yeat voted upon. LOL get real
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
157,779
Reaction score
21,920
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
I never said that.
One machine crashed and they had to replace it. The judge didn't order that though.
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
The company said it is impossible to alter votes since the voter gets a slip of paper from the machine which matches the voter's selection and is used in recounts both with the machine and the voter.
So the machine can detect a slip like a absentee ballot that was never mailed out yeat voted upon. LOL get real
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,460
Reaction score
15,779
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.

That's why we have paper trails....that were added in all the contentious states this year, and the absentee vote has ballots, hand written, circles filled out ballots, to compare to the machine votes tallied....

The hand recounts of paper ballots, match up with the machine tallies almost perfectly... in the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
Paper trails from voting machines? Not really. Matching "machine tallies" by "hand recount" means nothing. Absentee voting? Of course! Nothing can replace hand marked, hand counted paper balloting.
The new VSAP system is a touchscreen Ballot Marking Device or BMD, which prints out a computer-marked paper ballot summary of votes selected via the touchscreen, before using another computer, an optical-scanner, to read the non-human readable QR Code that is also printed on the ballot summary. The QR Codes are used to tally votes. While the QR Code (a type of barcode) cannot be verified for accuracy by voters, it is also impossible with such systems to know if any voter has even verified the human-readable portion of the ballot summary at all, much less correctly, after an election. Studies reveal that most do not verify computer-marked ballots at all, and that of the minority who do, most don't recall the details or selections on the ballot they voted just moments earlier. That's just one of the many reasons why most cybersecurity and voting systems experts warn against the use of such systems which are now proliferating --- and sometimes replacing verifiable hand-marked paper ballot systems --- in many states and counties across the country before 2020. (The list of states where counties or the entire state are moving to BMD systems include a number of key battleground states. Such systems are planned for use next year, or are already being used, in OH, WI, PA, TX, WV, KY, NY, NJ, KS, TN, IN, SC, NC and, yes, CA, unless the public prevents these plans.)
the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
GA (you can look up WI - SSDD):
The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have failed to implement a constitutionally acceptable election system by requiring all in-person voters to use a BMD system that, as a whole, in its design and operation, is not voter-verifiable, secure, or reliable. They contend this system. suffers from some of the same major cybersecurity vulnerabilities posed by Defendants’ deeply flawed, outdated Direct Recording Electronic (“DRE”) Voting System addressed by the Court’s lengthy Order of August 15, 2019 that granted injunctive relief.3 (Doc. 579.) Plaintiffs’ challenge embraces an array of associated issues involving the electronic voting process that impact if an individual’s vote (whether recorded from a scanned BMD-generated barcode or a hand-marked paper ballot) will be correctly captured, scanned, and accurately counted.4 Their claims thus also raise significant issues regarding the auditing of the election system’s voting results and ballot processing.
Thanks, that's informative....

But doesn't that indicate that the way the majority of democrats voted was accurate? We primarily used paper, absentee ballots.

If the cheating or hacking occurred, wouldn't it be, for in person voting?
 

Grumblenuts

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
1,179
Points
140
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.

That's why we have paper trails....that were added in all the contentious states this year, and the absentee vote has ballots, hand written, circles filled out ballots, to compare to the machine votes tallied....

The hand recounts of paper ballots, match up with the machine tallies almost perfectly... in the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
Paper trails from voting machines? Not really. Matching "machine tallies" by "hand recount" means nothing. Absentee voting? Of course! Nothing can replace hand marked, hand counted paper balloting.
The new VSAP system is a touchscreen Ballot Marking Device or BMD, which prints out a computer-marked paper ballot summary of votes selected via the touchscreen, before using another computer, an optical-scanner, to read the non-human readable QR Code that is also printed on the ballot summary. The QR Codes are used to tally votes. While the QR Code (a type of barcode) cannot be verified for accuracy by voters, it is also impossible with such systems to know if any voter has even verified the human-readable portion of the ballot summary at all, much less correctly, after an election. Studies reveal that most do not verify computer-marked ballots at all, and that of the minority who do, most don't recall the details or selections on the ballot they voted just moments earlier. That's just one of the many reasons why most cybersecurity and voting systems experts warn against the use of such systems which are now proliferating --- and sometimes replacing verifiable hand-marked paper ballot systems --- in many states and counties across the country before 2020. (The list of states where counties or the entire state are moving to BMD systems include a number of key battleground states. Such systems are planned for use next year, or are already being used, in OH, WI, PA, TX, WV, KY, NY, NJ, KS, TN, IN, SC, NC and, yes, CA, unless the public prevents these plans.)
the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
GA (you can look up WI - SSDD):
The Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have failed to implement a constitutionally acceptable election system by requiring all in-person voters to use a BMD system that, as a whole, in its design and operation, is not voter-verifiable, secure, or reliable. They contend this system. suffers from some of the same major cybersecurity vulnerabilities posed by Defendants’ deeply flawed, outdated Direct Recording Electronic (“DRE”) Voting System addressed by the Court’s lengthy Order of August 15, 2019 that granted injunctive relief.3 (Doc. 579.) Plaintiffs’ challenge embraces an array of associated issues involving the electronic voting process that impact if an individual’s vote (whether recorded from a scanned BMD-generated barcode or a hand-marked paper ballot) will be correctly captured, scanned, and accurately counted.4 Their claims thus also raise significant issues regarding the auditing of the election system’s voting results and ballot processing.
Thanks, that's informative....

But doesn't that indicate that the way the majority of democrats voted was accurate? We primarily used paper, absentee ballots.

If the cheating or hacking occurred, wouldn't it be, for in person voting?
Yep :)
 
OP
Contumacious

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
19,734
Reaction score
2,454
Points
280
Location
Adjuntas, PR , USA
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."

Tech millionaire funds hacking team; He is Convinced that the 2020 election was 100% rigged
 
OP
Contumacious

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
19,734
Reaction score
2,454
Points
280
Location
Adjuntas, PR , USA
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.




Powell calls for criminal probe into those who gave Dominion a $100 million+ contract

There should be an investigation, a thorough criminal investigation, frankly, of everyone involved in acquiring the Dominion System for the state of Georgia.”


“And frankly for every other state,” she continued “given how appalling the system is and the fact it was designed to manipulate the votes and destroy the real votes of American citizens who were casting legal votes.”


Powell indicated her investigation is turning up potential criminal allegations, including “money or benefits being paid to family members of those who signed the contract for Georgia.
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,928
Reaction score
702
Points
200
The thing about using 100% unverifiable voting machines is that they're unverifiable. Little late to complain now if that wasn't the intent.

That's why we have paper trails....that were added in all the contentious states this year, and the absentee vote has ballots, hand written, circles filled out ballots, to compare to the machine votes tallied....

The hand recounts of paper ballots, match up with the machine tallies almost perfectly... in the Georgia and Wisconsin recounts.... there was no computer fraud.... in those two states...
That is exactly what the man in charge of the election said about paper ballots. You know, the guy Trump fired for telling. The truth about a clean election he had worked to make sure was safe for 3 and a half years?
 

anynameyouwish

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
5,921
Reaction score
1,462
Points
170
At 10:10 PM on Sunday night Judge Timothy Batten again issued a temporary restraining order for 10 days against the destruction of evidence.

HALLELUJAH




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker

·
Nov 29, 2020
GEORGIA. UPDATE. UPDATE.


"Defendants are hereby ENJOINED & RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any DOMINION VOTING MACHINE..."
So why should anyone care about this?

This was not intended for you.


Go back to fellating Biden


.
Who was it intended for?

For those proud patriots - the 80,000,000 who voted for Donald J Trump


.
you are bad at math

80 million did NOT vote for trump

and i dont believe 74 million voted for him.

im sure its a lie and trump is cheating
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top