Bragg Soldiers Who Cheered Trump's Political Attacks While in Uniform Were Checked for Allegiance, Appearance

Yeah whatever douche....Go play in traffic.
Explain how the military.com story has been "exposed".

Or just admit that you are a mentally disturbed MAGA and completely full of shit.
 
All one has to do is read through your posting history in here, to know you’re a liar.

Ah yes, the last refuge of a moron. Accuse truth tellers of being liars while lying about everything.

Not unlike what dems have done. Over the last few years democrats have thrown their very own overboard for not adhering to the party first policy, all the way up to and including a sitting president of the United States. One day Biden was their hero. The next day Biden was no longer of any use to the party and, even though he was the current president who had actually won the primaries, the deep state was still able to throw him overboard. Ditto several others, most recently John Fetterman who has been branded a traitor. So the deep state is out to get him for his transgressions.

Completely unlike Democrats. Republicans have been destroying own since Newt Gingerich put out that hachet job documentary “When Mitt Romney Came To Town”.

What happened to Joe Biden was puppy shit compared to what Republicans did to their Candidates over the years. Although Republicans didn’t used to use violence or threats of violence until Trump.

Trump incites the crazy and weak minded and brazenly promotes violence against protestors, or anyone who disagrees with him. Like the guy living in his van who was send letter bombs. The guy who attacked Paul Pelosi, or the guy in Minnesota this weekend.

This weekend, a sitting US Senator was roughed up and handcuffed because he dared question Secretary Noem when she claimed she was there to liberate California from “Incompetent Commie Leadership”

Botox Barbie had a full hair and makeup team with her. Maybe she’ll do a sexy photo shoot with prisoners in their underwear while she’s there too.
 
All one has to do is read through your posting history in here, to know you’re a liar.

Ah yes, the last refuge of a moron. Accuse truth tellers of being liars. You do that a LOT Mac, without posting ANYTHING to refute the poster. When you go straight to name calling like that, it's proof positive that the poster is NOT lying, that denial is complete bullshit.

Grow the **** up, mac. Nobody believes Trump or anything he says because HE;S LYING.
 

Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’​


Well, he definitely sees the opportunity to use the ones who are living as props.

Internal 82nd Airborne Division communications reviewed by Military.com reveal a tightly orchestrated effort to curate the optics of Trump's recent visit, including handpicking soldiers for the audience based on political leanings and physical appearance. The troops ultimately selected to be behind Trump and visible to the cameras were almost exclusively male.

One unit-level message bluntly said "no fat soldiers."

"If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out," another note to troops said.
Yet another fabrication by our corrupt media. The most obvious practices become an evil criminal conspiracy to them.

FYI, Trump never called our troops losers and suckers. That lie came from Trump's former Chief of Staff John Kelly. Trump had to get rid of the back-stabbing POS early in his first term. The discredited report came from "The Atlantic"....the same rag that spied on Pete Hegseth's private communications.

BTW, whenever they have parades and events....only those who deserve to be there are allowed to be there.
This is the entire purpose of Drill & Ceremony.
They don't want our military to look like a gaggle-fck.
They want them to look good in their uniforms and march in precision.

It was always like that throughout my military career.
 
Yet another fabrication by our corrupt media. The most obvious practices become an evil criminal conspiracy to them.

FYI, Trump never called our troops losers and suckers. That lie came from Trump's former Chief of Staff John Kelly. Trump had to get rid of the back-stabbing POS early in his first term. The discredited report came from "The Atlantic"....the same rag that spied on Pete Hegseth's private communications.

BTW, whenever they have parades and events....only those who deserve to be there are allowed to be there.
This is the entire purpose of Drill & Ceremony.
They don't want our military to look like a gaggle-fck.
They want them to look good in their uniforms and march in precision.

It was always like that throughout my military career.
There's going to be lots of misinformation, and outright lies that the media will come up with out of sheer hatred of Trump. ie: Terry Moran (ABC).

One thing is for sure Berg80 will be here to promote every bit of it as if it were fact.
 
There's going to be lots of misinformation, and outright lies that the media will come up with out of sheer hatred of Trump. ie: Terry Moran (ABC).

One thing is for sure Berg80 will be here to promote every bit of it as if it were fact.
It's mostly negative spin.

These folks cannot keep themselves from lying about Trump.
 
A single party system can't have a leader that has a weak stomach for dealing with any opposition.

The Dem supporters should just keep up fukng around over Trump's methods and find out!

There's only one sure way to deal with socialism/communism and America has found out that democracy ain't it.
 
It's mostly negative spin.

These folks cannot keep themselves from lying about Trump.
You know what I don't get? Is that it is such a precarious time in history, that if there were ever a time where BOTH parties should be focusing on the threats here and abroad, that is now. Instead we have utterly stupid arguments about if an illegal criminal alien gets 15 hearings and appeals before they are deported, or if gender is a social construct...How stupid!!!
 
It was supposed to be a routine appearance, a visit from the commander in chief to rally the troops, boost morale and celebrate the Army's 250th-birthday week, which culminates with a Washington, D.C., parade slated for Saturday.

Instead, what unfolded Tuesday at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, bore little resemblance to the customary visit from a president and defense secretary. There, President Donald Trump unleashed a speech laced with partisan invective, goading jeers from a crowd of soldiers positioned behind his podium -- blurring the long-standing and sacrosanct line between the military and partisan politics.

As Trump viciously attacked his perceived political foes, he whipped up boos from the gathered troops directed at California leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom -- amid the president's controversial move to deploy the National Guard and Marines against protesters in Los Angeles -- as well as former President Joe Biden and the press. The soldiers roared with laughter and applauded Trump's diatribe in a shocking and rare public display of troops taking part in naked political partisanship.


Is there any traditional norm trump hasn't shattered? It has always been understood politicized speeches in front of uniformed military personnel is forbidden. So too putting soldiers on the streets of American cities unless requested or consented to by a states' governor.

Is it ego or a total lack of respect for the fidelity to convention his predecessors showed that allows Don to think no rules apply to him? That he can do anything he pleases regardless of the nation's heritage or our laws.

And if he made ones that didn't want to be there attend, you would ***** about that instead.

When all you do is complain, all your complaints become meaningless.
 
A single party system can't have a leader that has a weak stomach for dealing with any opposition.

The Dem supporters should just keep up fukng around over Trump's methods and find out!

There's only one sure way to deal with socialism/communism and America has found out that democracy ain't it.
We have screwed up an entire generation, the ones supposed to take over from us, by not only coddling them at every turn, but, by not paying attention to what they were learning in our own schools.

I am not at all convinced that the upcoming generation can handle a world busting at the seams....
 
You know what I don't get? Is that it is such a precarious time in history, that if there were ever a time where BOTH parties should be focusing on the threats here and abroad, that is now. Instead we have utterly stupid arguments about if an illegal criminal alien gets 15 hearings and appeals before they are deported, or if gender is a social construct...How stupid!!!
Democrats are making it pretty obvious what they're up to.

They're working with drug cartels to bring those criminals into the US.

I wouldn't be surprised if the cartels were sending kick-backs to off-shore accounts for members of congress.
 
Is there any traditional norm trump hasn't shattered?
I really don't think he knows about "norms" of adulthood in general. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth and given $400 million early, he has never had to learn the way intelligent adults behave in any given setting.

And he certainly doesn't understand how an intelligent and dignified world leader is supposed to act. He is exactly the same in every social environment, regardless of the context.

He never grew up. He never progressed. He never evolved. He never HAD to. He demonstrates this pretty much every time he opens his mouth.

jZbwDvN.jpg
 
How is this different than Biden allowing millions of illegal aliens just because they vote Democrat? Biden won't allow white S. Afrikans into this country knowing they won't vote Democrat.
 
Prove they were credible, and I'll change my mind.
They are credible
The comvicted felon has confessed to committing the same crime he comitted when he sexually assaulted Carroll.
You just saying that the accusations are credible, does not make them credible.
Trumps confession of the behavior he is accused of provides all the credibility needed Simp.
He was never convicted of rape, so there was no rape.
Sure he was. In New York raping a woman by forcing your fingers into her vagina doesn't technically meet the definition of "rape," but that's just a technicality.
If some perv did the same thing to your wife, or mother, or daughter I'm pretty sure you'd have no trouble calling it what it is and I'll bet you'd want to see the ****** dead.
Or would you disparage and blame the accuser and make excuses for their assailant?
Sure you will. You cannot help yourself.

I would hope I would never sink so low as to want a sock puppet. But if I did, there would be no need. I can control you as easily as if I were pulling your rhetorical strings.

Watch . . .
I'll take that challenge Martha.
Give it your best shot chump.
 
15th post
They are credible
The comvicted felon has confessed to committing the same crime he comitted when he sexually assaulted Carroll.
Trump has confessed to no crime, and certainly not to rape.
Trumps confession of the behavior he is accused of provides all the credibility needed Simp.
So the imaginary confessions are your proof of the imaginary crimes?
Sure he was. In New York raping a woman by forcing your fingers into her vagina doesn't technically meet the definition of "rape," but that's just a technicality.
He was not convicted of that. I think you misunderstand the word.
If some perv did the same thing to your wife, or mother, or daughter I'm pretty sure you'd have no trouble calling it what it is and I'll bet you'd want to see the ****** dead.
Yes, but if someone did NOT do that to my wife, mother, or daughter, I wouldn't want them dead for what they didn't do but would really be horrible if they did.
Or would you disparage and blame the accuser and make excuses for their assailant?
I'd want proof before I expected the criminal justice system to convict anyone. Trump was never convicted of rape, so there was no rape. Just like you will claim that Abrego Garcia was not guilty of human trafficking since he has not been convicted.

The difference is that the evidence of Van Hollen's crush trafficking illegals is decisive, whereas we only have the word of an admitted gold digger that Trumped "raped" her.
I'll take that challenge Martha.
Give it your best shot chump.
You already lost my challenge. You claimed:

BTW, I won't be responding to any more of your attempts to deflect from the subject at hand.


Then you responded to my statements which were nothing to do with the OP. Because - as I said - you cannot help yourself.

Want a do-over?

Try not to respond to this post . . .
 
From the OP posted article:

As Trump viciously attacked his perceived political foes, he whipped up boos from the gathered troops directed at California leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom -- amid the president's controversial move to deploy the National Guard and Marines against protesters in Los Angeles -- as well as former President Joe Biden and the press. The soldiers roared with laughter and applauded Trump's diatribe in a shocking and rare public display of troops taking part in naked political partisanship
 
Trump has confessed to no crime, and certainly not to rape.

So the imaginary confessions are your proof of the imaginary crimes?

He was not convicted of that. I think you misunderstand the word.

Yes, but if someone did NOT do that to my wife, mother, or daughter, I wouldn't want them dead for what they didn't do but would really be horrible if they did.
Yet you wouldn't even mind if Trump just walked right up to one of them and grabbed em' by the *****?


I'd want proof before I expected the criminal justice system to convict anyone. Trump was never convicted of rape, so there was no rape. Just like you will claim that Abrego Garcia was not guilty of human trafficking since he has not been convicted.

The difference is that the evidence of Van Hollen's crush trafficking illegals is decisive, whereas we only have the word of an admitted gold digger that Trumped "raped" her.
You already lost my challenge. You claimed:

BTW, I won't be responding to any more of your attempts to deflect from the subject at hand.
Good. I always love it when the garbage takes itself out.
Then you responded to my statements which were nothing to do with the OP. Because - as I said - you cannot help yourself.

Want a do-over?
Are you trying to speak English here?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom