P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
That is why they stopped them in 2006.
Boycott Israel
- Thread starter fairandbalanced
- Start date
That is why they stopped them in 2006.
The bus attack that we're discussing !!
Huh??
Israel stopped them by increasing the amount of checkpoints and building a wall.
You are very gullible to believe what Hamas said about them stopping suicide bombings.
Once they realized they were incapable of sending any more bombers in, they claim it was them who stopped it. sour grapes
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
You can believe it if you want.
How about the hundreds of Palestinians that Israel has killed?
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
Standard Israeli bullshit.
Geez, what's with your deflections?? We started discussing the bus attack because we were talking about Hamas having anti tank missiles, remember ??
I find it very pathetic Tinmore that you would deny such an attack happening
I provided you with more then enough evidence, including the boys name on Btselem, the same site that you use
LOL ! And what do you call "Hamas stopped suicide bombings"
I call that bullshit ..
OF course, once a main part of the wall was built, suicide bombings practically ended. Every one knows that.
The issue with you is that you're extremely bias
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
Of course they stopped abruptly during the long construction which is still not complete.
Hamas has people inside Israel.
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
OK, it happened. What happened?
Got a link for that ?
I have no idea what you're saying here.
When they brag about targeting children to cause the maximum amount of harm and hardship then you might have a point. But while the Israeli government protects its children from harm and does all it can to stop murdering muslim terrorists then it is beyond reproach
All valid military targets according to the Geneva conventions, if you have a problem with International Law then take it up with the relevant people. Don't think that by moaning on here the rules will be changed in islams favour.
Isn't Google maps wonderful when it shows the swimming pools, terraces, posh hotels, country clubs and other such affluent trappings in gaza
There was a case some years back were a weapon was discharged in the air and the bullet came down and killed a baby, guess who was initially blamed for the death by the likes of tinny. No remorse or retraction either when it was proven that the IDF could not have fired the shot
Yes they don't use them to terrorise their neighbours, just to defend their civilians from attack
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,905
- 4,937
- 1,815
Keep telling you that is covered by the Geneva conventions and is allowed because they are valid military targets. While the hamas goons insist on using civilian areas to attack Israel the Israel will keep on demolishing them, it is in no way terrorism but valid defence tactics. I don't see you complaining about the good old US of A doing the same in Iraq, afgahnistan and pakistan
RoccoR
Gold Member
P F Tinmore, et al,
The problem with any set of standards relative to arms trade treaties or establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms, is that it runs afoul of:
In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, both sides claim to a Chapter VII (Article 51) self-defense claimant.
It is generally understood compliant states will prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons should identify, where applicable, groups and individuals engaged in the illegal manufacture, trade, stockpiling, transfer, possession, as well as financing for acquisition, of illicit small arms and light weapons, and take
action under appropriate national law against such groups and individuals. However, in regards to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, this is entirely impractical. The Arab League has declared that the Hostile Palestinians have the right to combat foreign occupation and aggression by whatever means, including armed struggle, in order to liberate their territories and secure their right to self-determination, and independence and to do so in such a manner as to preserve the territorial integrity of each Arab country.
This is the great circle I wrote about before. The Hostile Arab Palestinians and Arab League have defined the aggressor as the Israelis. Thus no international law applies.
Israel, having been established and is recognized as having complied with the Steps Preparatory to Independence, as implemented by the UN Palestine Commission, was immediately attacked by the opposition to peace, in order to defy and overturn the implementation process. This has lead to a six+ decade long struggle and the formation of a dysfunctional State of Palestine, that argues more for the right to continue the armed struggle; and argues NOT for the establishment of peace.
Most Respectfully,
R
The problem with any set of standards relative to arms trade treaties or establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms, is that it runs afoul of:
(a) The right of States to individual and collective self-defence, in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations;
(b) The right of States to manufacture, export, import or transfer arms;
(c) The right of self-determination and the liberation struggle.
(b) The right of States to manufacture, export, import or transfer arms;
(c) The right of self-determination and the liberation struggle.
(COMMENT)
In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, both sides claim to a Chapter VII (Article 51) self-defense claimant.
It is generally understood compliant states will prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons should identify, where applicable, groups and individuals engaged in the illegal manufacture, trade, stockpiling, transfer, possession, as well as financing for acquisition, of illicit small arms and light weapons, and take
action under appropriate national law against such groups and individuals. However, in regards to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, this is entirely impractical. The Arab League has declared that the Hostile Palestinians have the right to combat foreign occupation and aggression by whatever means, including armed struggle, in order to liberate their territories and secure their right to self-determination, and independence and to do so in such a manner as to preserve the territorial integrity of each Arab country.
This is the great circle I wrote about before. The Hostile Arab Palestinians and Arab League have defined the aggressor as the Israelis. Thus no international law applies.
Israel, having been established and is recognized as having complied with the Steps Preparatory to Independence, as implemented by the UN Palestine Commission, was immediately attacked by the opposition to peace, in order to defy and overturn the implementation process. This has lead to a six+ decade long struggle and the formation of a dysfunctional State of Palestine, that argues more for the right to continue the armed struggle; and argues NOT for the establishment of peace.
Most Respectfully,
R
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Schumer just sounded the alarm that the SAVE America Act will REMOVE "25 MILLION PEOPLE" from the voter rolls- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 23
-
-
Tech companies dealing with data center protests locally are fighting a losing battle- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 1
Latest Discussions
-
Man Hurls N-Word at 9-Year-Old Black Boy in Unhinged Attack, Allegedly- Latest: Superbadbrutha
