Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #361
Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
Honestly, I can't see how those folks would get along in the first place. They really have very little in common ideologically.
It was funny to watch them both back away from Paul with their vague answers.Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
I wouldn't be so sure with DeMint. They do have a lot in common in regards to the "major" fiscal issues and what not.Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
Honestly, I can't see how those folks would get along in the first place. They really have very little in common ideologically.
Yeah, Rand wants to burn crosses and kill black people? If you believe that then You're truly a fucking idiot bro. ~BH
Go read the KKK's political platform, then come back and tell me how much of it you agree with.![]()
carb, I spent so many years respecting you as a poster there and here. Of course we disagree Politically, and it wasn't always either. You seem to have lost any commonsense and turned into a racist yourself? That's a shame bro. I know you're a smart guy, and that's why it's a shame. ~BH
It was funny to watch them both back away from Paul with their vague answers.Boooom. Seems Sen. Jim Demint and Rep. Eric Cantor are backing away from Dr. Paul. How many others will throw him under the bus?
Go read the KKK's political platform, then come back and tell me how much of it you agree with.![]()
carb, I spent so many years respecting you as a poster there and here. Of course we disagree Politically, and it wasn't always either. You seem to have lost any commonsense and turned into a racist yourself? That's a shame bro. I know you're a smart guy, and that's why it's a shame. ~BH
Frankly you overestimate my concern for your opinion of me.
You're calling me a racist why? exactly? Before I neg rep you...
A very substantial margin of victory for the Tea Party candidate.
Paul will now quickly mend fences with the Republican Party machine, but will, by the significance of his victory, be in the driver's seat when dictating terms.
And so the conservative tide heading into November 2010 grows...
Rand Paul is doing fine - his take on the Civil Rights Act actually shows a depth that goes beyond the superficial race card politics of the liberal left.
He has considerable momentum and appears poised to win the Senate Seat...
I got a couple snappy come backs for ya pertaining to this guy if you want them...Jury is out, his hair looks a little funny but so does my favorite senator's hair an he doesn't wear a rug. Sherrod Brown always looks like a big mess.
We'll find out when we see an interview outside.
Looks a little like Eddie Haskell to me
![]()
![]()
That's all you desperate morons have to come back with after another defeat? LMAO! ~BH
As Matt Welch noted earlier, Republican senatorial hopeful Rand Paul is taking heat for criticizing those sections of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that prohibit discrimination by private businesses. As Paul’s interview last night with MSNBC host Rachel Maddow indicates, many on the left see Paul’s libertarian position on this issue as a tacit endorsement of racism (or worse). As Maddow put it, “unless it's illegal, there's nothing to stop that—there's nothing under your world view to stop the country from re-segregating like we were before the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”
Of course, Paul was pretty clear that he supports the federal desegregation of public schools and the federal enforcement of voting rights, as well as most of the other provisions in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, so it’s unlikely we’ll see any wholesale re-segregating if his “world view” ever reaches the commanding heights. Maddow can rest easy.
A very substantial margin of victory for the Tea Party candidate.
Paul will now quickly mend fences with the Republican Party machine, but will, by the significance of his victory, be in the driver's seat when dictating terms.
And so the conservative tide heading into November 2010 grows...
___
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Rand Paul defeated Republican establishment favorite Trey Grayson in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate, a closely watched race that was a key test of the tea party movement's strength.
Paul, the son of former presidential candidate U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, on Tuesday gave the tea party its first victory in a statewide election — one that could embolden the fledgling political movement in other states. With 31 percent of precincts reporting, Paul was leading with 65,702 votes, or 59 percent, to Grayson's 40,767 votes or 37 percent.
Paul wins Ky. Sen. primary in test of tea party | Top AP Stories | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Rand Paul is doing fine - his take on the Civil Rights Act actually shows a depth that goes beyond the superficial race card politics of the liberal left.
He has considerable momentum and appears poised to win the Senate Seat...