Boom!!! Hillary Clinton to be jailed sooner than later

[Sir_chilzy]

 

[DarkFury]

Where the hell is the content? The videos are fine but where the hell is the content?
Get it right or I will flag you myself.
FURY

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^^

 

[deannalw]

It's too late for sooner or later. It's definitely already later, not sooner.

Pay attention to the tattletailpants. If you are going to post an article or video, it must be accompanied with a comment of your own.

Dems the roolz

 

[Mac1958]

One of the rules here is that you can't just start a thread with a video or a link. You have to also provide some commentary. Add something of value to it.

That's a good rule, I think. Just FYI.
.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

There seems to be a pattern.
Hillary was corrupt when she was a senator's aide, a governor's wife, a first lady, a senator, a secretary of state and as a candidate for president.
There are plenty of books available about Hillary's corruption.

 

[deannalw]

Just curious... Why do you think it's a good rule?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Just curious... Why do you think it's a good rule?

1) Makes sure you're not a drive-by type

 

[JakeStarkey]

TroglocratsRdumb is more likely to be jailed than either Clinton.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

In before the lock, it's been told twice by two mods about this shit and had threads locked and still it refuses to adhere to the rules of this forum.

Here's the other it just posted, same thing:

Noble effort to stop sexual harassment turns into a suicide mission

 

[Jantje_Smit]

There are plenty of books available about Hillary's corruption.

Indeed

But the most qualified princess in history is part of the oligarchy that will never go to jail.... laws are for the little people after all....

 

[deannalw]

Just curious... Why do you think it's a good rule?

1) Makes sure you're not a drive-by type

Why would anyone care? If it's a good article/ video/ subject, it will spark a conversation regardless if the op sticks around or not.

And the op could post a comment and still be an absent op

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

One of the rules here is that you can't just start a thread with a video or a link. You have to also provide some commentary. Add something of value to it.

That's a good rule, I think. Just FYI.
.

It's either a Professional Moron or a Professional Bot.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Just curious... Why do you think it's a good rule?

1) Makes sure you're not a drive-by type

Why would anyone care? If it's a good article/ video/ subject, it will spark a conversation regardless if the op sticks around or not.

And the op could post a comment and still be an absent op

It could just be some shnook spamming. I personally like the rule. We're all (allegedly) adults here.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Just curious... Why do you think it's a good rule?

1) Makes sure you're not a drive-by type

Why would anyone care? If it's a good article/ video/ subject, it will spark a conversation regardless if the op sticks around or not.

And the op could post a comment and still be an absent op

It's because Spammer Bots are not allowed, that's why that rule is in.

 

[DarkFury]

TroglocratsRdumb is more likely to be jailed than either Clinton.

I think Debbie Wasserman Shultz is going to wind up doing time for employing that islamic terrorist.

 

[deannalw]

TroglocratsRdumb is more likely to be jailed than either Clinton.

If she were alive, Mother Teresa would be more likely...

 

[LoneLaugher]

Where the hell is the content? The videos are fine but where the hell is the content?
Get it right or I will flag you myself.
FURY

Whoa! You sound serious!

 

[jillian]

She is not going to jail.

But perhaps you should move to Bolivia.

Or Russia

That seems to be where you belong

 

[jillian]

One of the rules here is that you can't just start a thread with a video or a link. You have to also provide some commentary. Add something of value to it.

That's a good rule, I think. Just FYI.
.

Funny how the shills thread wasn't deleted for that