Bombshell study concludes there is no evidence for anthropogenic climate change...

[Donald H]

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

 

[task0778]

Liberals will never accept this study. It provides reasonable doubt to their theorem that humans can change the climate.

Sounds like more than a reasonable doubt to me. It sounds more like reasonable proof.

Time for the Marxist left to follow the science for once.

The Left only believes in science that supports their political ambitions.

Cool...let's do nothing then.

No, but let's not waste trillions of dollars on a fucking high speed train that will never be cost-effective. There's nothing wrong with trying to reduce air pollution, but it sure as hell is NOT the number one greatest threat to our national security, as some on the Left have claimed. We need to be smarter with our tax-dollars IMHO.

Yep, it was always about money and control of the populace. Same as covid and it's seven merry little variants.

You know, I've never been much of a conspiracy theorist, but God Damned if it doesn't feel like you're exactly right.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

Uh, no.


What it looks to me like is a giant, global redistribution of wealth scheme, with a lot of FWA included and payoffs to the big party donors. It has always been bullshit, and the democrats politicized it to their advantage as much as they could, and will continue to spout the same crap: "In another 10 years we'll all be treading water!" And the gullibles that vote for them swallow it whole without even a doubt.

 

[Donald H]

Q. What do you call a country whose people forsake modern science in exchange for praying to jesus for help to stop the rising tide?

A. A failed clusterfuk.

 

[Nostra]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

 

[The Irish Ram]

FREE YOURSELF FROM THE ILLUSION that climate change has anything to do with the environment.
We, de facto, spread the world's wealth through "climate change".

^^^^^ straight from the horse's mouth. The United Nations. They are draining our country dry. And we welcome it...

 

[22lcidw]

Bombshell study concludes there is no evidence for anthropogenic climate change...​

Conclusion We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

Direct link to the study:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf
Bombshell Claim: Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which 'climate change' is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found "practically no anthropogenic [man-made] climate change" after a series of studies.
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.
This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence — could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it," comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. "This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect."

In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic [man-made] climate change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover "practically" controls global temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is anthropogenic, or caused by human activity.

The following is a key bombshell section in one of the studies conducted by Finland's Turku University team:
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why 6 J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.
This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries' populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "drastic measures to cut carbon emissions" which would ultimately require radical legislation changes to "remake the U.S. economy" would not only potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn't even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.

To put AOC's "drastic measures" in perspective — based entirely on the fundamental assumption of the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate — consider the following conclusions from the Finnish studies:
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”
Which leads the scientists to state further:
“Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased carbon dioxide is less than 10 percent, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change,” the researchers concluded.
And the team in Japan has called for a total reevaluation of current climate models, which remain dangerously flawed for dismissing a crucial variable:
This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect. The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic rays is important when thinking about current global warming as well as the warm period of the medieval era.
Failure to account for this results in the following, according to the one in the series of studies: "The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models."

"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice," the researchers conclude.

Though we doubt the ideologues currently pushing to radically remake the American economy through what ends up being a $93 trillion proposal (according to one study) — including AOC's call for a whopping 70% top tax rate — will carefully inquire of this new bombshell scientific confirmation presented in the new research, we at least hope the US scientific community takes heed before it's too late in the cause of accurate and authentic science that would stave off irreparable economic disaster that would no doubt ripple across the globe, adding to both human and environmental misery.

And "too late" that is, not for some mythical imminent or near-future "global warming Armageddon" as the currently in vogue highly politicized "science" of activists and congress members alike claims.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...exist-practice

is this where one of the board left wing mods says this is a wall of text and it isn't political?

Actually everything is political. Especially man made climate change.

Has little to do with with actual weather.

Cool...let's do nothing then.

Get the nations who do little on anything environmental to change. Otherwise I would support several blue cities vaporized. And many will help the enemy to do it.

 

[Donald H]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

Maybe, but you're going to hear a lot more from me.

You can face the music or you can be a spammer like uncotare, and the rest of the racist crew.

What's wrong with country's people who would elect a doddering old fool as their president, to replace a totally mad psychopath?

 

[toobfreak]

Facts don't matter in lefty science.

That is because with real science, you FOLLOW where the facts take you, no matter how uncomfortable they may be.

Leftwing science is the opposite: they determine where they want to go to support their beliefs then use science to build the staircase for getting there and justifying them.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The Left only believes in science that supports their political ambitions.

You mean their support for transexuals who are "women" when it serves their purposes?
(like when winning sports trophies or gaining entry to women's prisons and bathrooms?)
That's not "science"! That's craven opportunism!

 

[Nostra]

Hi

The study is obvious nonsense.
Of course cosmic rays can cause clouds which can retain heat at night, but during the day, clouds increase albedo, which cools the climate.
And cosmic rays have NOT changed.
We constantly measure them and they have not increased while temperature has.
The current temp readings are all record highs.
At this point is it incredibly foolish to claim we are not causing global warming.
Some cities in Canada reached over 130 degrees, and hundreds have died from the increased heat.

We knew the left would celebrate over the high temperatures in the west. So, the GLOBAL WARMING has caused record temperatures in a SPECIFIC AREA on the globe and NOT OTHER AREAS?

LOL

Over a six-day period during the middle of June 2021, a dome of hot air languished over the western United States, causing temperatures to skyrocket. From June 15-20, all-time maximum temperature records fell at locations in seven different states (CA, AZ, NM, UT, CO, WY, MT). In Phoenix, Arizona, the high temperature was over 115 degrees for a record-setting six consecutive days, topping out at 118 degrees on June 17.


That is what caused the heat wave. Not cow farts.

Record-breaking June 2021 heatwave impacts the U.S. West

An early summer heatwave across the drought-stricken West smashed records in seven states as temperatures cleared 100 degrees Fahrenheit for days on end.

www.climate.gov

Obviously the heat wave was temporary weather and not global climate, but something had to have changed in order to make these records possible. And that had to be climate. Global warming means more energy in the weather, so you can have more frequent and more powerful storms, more powerful high pressure events that cause heat waves, etc.
Climate is the average of all the local weather, but weather is still driven by climate.
A climate warms, you will have more weather extremes.
When climate cools, weather tends towards being more static.

How do you explain the record cold this winter? Oh right…..MMGW caused that too.

 

[Nostra]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

Maybe, but you're going to hear a lot more from me.

You can face the music or you can be a spammer like uncotare, and the rest of the racist crew.

What's wrong with country's people who would elect a doddering old fool as their president, to replace a totally mad psychopath?

Now I’m a racist? Gotta link to a racist post by me?

 

[Donald H]

Facts don't matter in lefty science.

That is because with real science, you FOLLOW where the facts take you, no matter how uncomfortable they may be.

Leftwing science is the opposite: they determine where they want to go to support their beliefs then use science to build the staircase for getting there and justifying them.

Rightist science finds facts in Intelligent Design!
Proof that creationist theory and evolutionist theories are both right!

It's an easy choice!

 

[Theowl32]

Yeap, the left rejecting actual science again and loudly insist world global governments are all trustworthy and never have any other motivation other than the well being of the poor and downtrodden in their respective countries.

Sigh....

How big of a house do we suppose Donald H's house is that his dad pays for?

Got to laugh out loud at the notion that any leftist that "pays their own bills" yelling and screaming for higher taxes and yell for higher gas prices.

As they all gleefully guzzle fossil fuels as they spend their days and nights on the internet.

All free to live like the Amish and all can voluntarily pay more taxes, but curiously never do.

Lol at Their hypocrisy they are either completely unaware of or deliberately ignore.

The World is made for those who are not under the curse of self awareness.

 

[Muhammed]

I think if it comes to pass it is too late. Kind of like trying to buy health insurance from the ambulance taking you to the hospital. What you should do is pay for insurance and hope you never need it.

So what would you like to do to combat an unprecedented and anomalous rise in sea levels?
And what other one of a kind disasters would you like to change society over?
Simply eliminate all coastal societies?
Place canopys over all of society to prevent a one in a billion collision with a comet that no man made
device could prevent anyway?

Sensible precautions are one things. Trying to protect yourself against unforeseeable and unstoppable
disasters are another. Life on this planet is not guaranteed. Ask a brontosaurus, if you can find one.

We know climate changes, that is not really in question, we need to study and understand it.

The best guess I've seen if that rising CO2 is making things worse. There is plenty of low-hanging fruit that would allow us to lessen the amount we put into the air without bankrupting ourselves.

At the same time we need to have figured out how we can control or at least affect climate change. Science is our friend here, not our enemy.

Despite your guess, which highly based on false propaganda and fake news, there is no evidence that rising CO2 is making anything worse.

In fact, higher CO2 levels promote biodiversity by helping plants thrive and even become more drought resistant. Thus making the Earth greener.

CO2 is the green gas.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Bombshell study concludes there is no evidence for anthropogenic climate change...​

Conclusion We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

Direct link to the study:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf
Bombshell Claim: Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which 'climate change' is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found "practically no anthropogenic [man-made] climate change" after a series of studies.
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.
This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence — could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it," comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. "This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect."

In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic [man-made] climate change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover "practically" controls global temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is anthropogenic, or caused by human activity.

The following is a key bombshell section in one of the studies conducted by Finland's Turku University team:
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why 6 J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.
This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries' populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "drastic measures to cut carbon emissions" which would ultimately require radical legislation changes to "remake the U.S. economy" would not only potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn't even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.

To put AOC's "drastic measures" in perspective — based entirely on the fundamental assumption of the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate — consider the following conclusions from the Finnish studies:
“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”
Which leads the scientists to state further:
“Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased carbon dioxide is less than 10 percent, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change,” the researchers concluded.
And the team in Japan has called for a total reevaluation of current climate models, which remain dangerously flawed for dismissing a crucial variable:
This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect. The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic rays is important when thinking about current global warming as well as the warm period of the medieval era.
Failure to account for this results in the following, according to the one in the series of studies: "The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models."

"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice," the researchers conclude.

Though we doubt the ideologues currently pushing to radically remake the American economy through what ends up being a $93 trillion proposal (according to one study) — including AOC's call for a whopping 70% top tax rate — will carefully inquire of this new bombshell scientific confirmation presented in the new research, we at least hope the US scientific community takes heed before it's too late in the cause of accurate and authentic science that would stave off irreparable economic disaster that would no doubt ripple across the globe, adding to both human and environmental misery.

And "too late" that is, not for some mythical imminent or near-future "global warming Armageddon" as the currently in vogue highly politicized "science" of activists and congress members alike claims.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...exist-practice

is this where one of the board left wing mods says this is a wall of text and it isn't political?

Actually everything is political. Especially man made climate change.

Has little to do with with actual weather.

This may be true, maybe not, I don't know enough to say, but I'm not sure why it matters. If the sea level rises because of natural or manmade reasons, the sea level still rises and that would spell disaster for many.

One thing we do know is that civilization thrives when the climate is warmer and suffers when the climate is cooler.

Wrong.
When the climate was cooler, then the Sahara was a highly populated jungle of swamps.
When fishing boats go out, they don't go to the equator, but to the polar regions.

Humans like warm climate because we are too lean and have no fur.
But almost all other animals prefer colder climates, especially plants and fish.

"But almost all other animals prefer colder climates, especially plants and fish."

Well not to nitpick, but plants are not animals, different kingdom (plantae). Both are eukaryotes, but I digress. For the most part, plant life primarily thrives where there is adequate moisture, soil composition and exposure to sunlight by chloroplasts to generate ATP for the calvin cycle, rather than as a function of temperature (though some plants have more tolerance to cold temperatures, and some are more tolerant of warm temperatures).

Same with fish, some prefer warmer water in the tropic regions, while some prefer the colder deep water and polar regions.

 

[Donald H]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

Maybe, but you're going to hear a lot more from me.

You can face the music or you can be a spammer like uncotare, and the rest of the racist crew.

What's wrong with country's people who would elect a doddering old fool as their president, to replace a totally mad psychopath?

Now I’m a racist? Gotta link to a racist post by me?

More than half of Americans are racists to some degree.
That being over half puts the onus on you to disprove.

And being a supporter of Trump, who is obviously a racist, is one strike against you.

Show us some evidence that says you aren't a racist. I could be wrong about you but it's very doubtful.

 

[Donald H]

In fact, higher CO2 levels promote biodiversity by helping plants thrive and even become more drought resistant. Thus making the Earth greener.

CO2 is the green gas.

Why is your thinking so fukked up?
Do you think that sort of comment will appeal to any grownups?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Liberals will never accept this study. It provides reasonable doubt to their theorem that humans can change the climate.

Sounds like more than a reasonable doubt to me. It sounds more like reasonable proof.

Time for the Marxist left to follow the science for once.

The Left only believes in science that supports their political ambitions.

Cool...let's do nothing then.

No, but let's not waste trillions of dollars on a fucking high speed train that will never be cost-effective. There's nothing wrong with trying to reduce air pollution, but it sure as hell is NOT the number one greatest threat to our national security, as some on the Left have claimed. We need to be smarter with our tax-dollars IMHO.

Yep, it was always about money and control of the populace. Same as covid and it's seven merry little variants.

You know, I've never been much of a conspiracy theorist, but God Damned if it doesn't feel like you're exactly right.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

Uh, no.


What it looks to me like is a giant, global redistribution of wealth scheme, with a lot of FWA included and payoffs to the big party donors. It has always been bullshit, and the democrats politicized it to their advantage as much as they could, and will continue to spout the same crap: "In another 10 years we'll all be treading water!" And the gullibles that vote for them swallow it whole without even a doubt.

Yeah right? One barely has to adjust the tin foil anymore to find the truth.

 

[Nostra]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

Maybe, but you're going to hear a lot more from me.

You can face the music or you can be a spammer like uncotare, and the rest of the racist crew.

What's wrong with country's people who would elect a doddering old fool as their president, to replace a totally mad psychopath?

Now I’m a racist? Gotta link to a racist post by me?

More than half of Americans are racists to some degree.
That being over half puts the onus on you to disprove.

And being a supporter of Trump, who is obviously a racist, is one strike against you.

Show us some evidence that says you aren't a racist. I could be wrong about you but it's very doubtful.

No, I don’t have to disprove shit, Dumbass.

 

[Donald H]

Y

Just another expression of extremist hate and frustration that has no meaning to normal and rational people.

Is this all being driven by the Trump loss at the ballot boxes and his ridiculous claim that he was cheated?

What is it that's sticking in American craws that has made them into such obnoxious deniers of science?

Hahahahahahahahaha!

ORANGE MAN BAD!

In fact, the orange man is only the inevitable result of what has been bad with America. Now the orange man has attached the blame to non-white people in America.
That's how Hitler faced the some problem by putting the blame on the Jews.

The blame belongs on the very wealthy in America because neither political party had any real ambition to share the wealth.

And now it's a near certainty that Biden is going to fail.
Did he really honestly attempt to change something by doublecrossing his wealthy benefactors?

You are a nutbag.

HTH

Maybe, but you're going to hear a lot more from me.

You can face the music or you can be a spammer like uncotare, and the rest of the racist crew.

What's wrong with country's people who would elect a doddering old fool as their president, to replace a totally mad psychopath?

Now I’m a racist? Gotta link to a racist post by me?

More than half of Americans are racists to some degree.
That being over half puts the onus on you to disprove.

And being a supporter of Trump, who is obviously a racist, is one strike against you.

Show us some evidence that says you aren't a racist. I could be wrong about you but it's very doubtful.

No, I don’t have to disprove shit, Dumbass.

Go play.