BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally—Not Hacked

Time to get real snowflakes, American Intelligence has made it perfectly clear who hacked DNC and why.

BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally—Not Hacked


BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally—Not Hacked



A mysterious IT specialist, who goes by the name The Forensicator, published a detailed report that appears to disprove the theory that the DNC was hacked by Russia.
The documents were copied on July 5th, five days before Seth Rich was murdered.


The Forensicator summarized the complex report into 10 bullet points.

The most important aspect about the report is the “estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s)” at which the documents were copied. It’s inconceivable DNC documents could have been copied at such speed from a remote location.



The report as laid out by The Forensicator:

Based on the analysis that is detailed below, the following key findings are presented:

  • On 7/5/2016 at approximately 6:45 PM Eastern time, someone copied the data that eventually appears on the “NGP VAN” 7zip file (the subject of this analysis). This 7zip file was published by a persona named Guccifer 2, two months later on September 13, 2016.

  • Due to the estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s) calculated in this study, it is unlikely that this initial data transfer could have been done remotely over the Internet.

  • The initial copying activity was likely done from a computer system that had direct access to the data. By “direct access” we mean that the individual who was collecting the data either had physical access to the computer where the data was stored, or the data was copied over a local high speed network (LAN).

  • They may have copied a much larger collection of data than the data present in the NGP VAN 7zip. This larger collection of data may have been as large as 19 GB. In that scenario the NGP VAN 7zip file represents only 1/10th of the total amount of material taken.

  • This initial copying activity was done on a system where Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) settings were in force. Most likely, the computer used to initially copy the data was located somewhere on the East Coast.

  • The data was likely initially copied to a computer running Linux, because the file last modified times all reflect the apparent time of the copy and this is a characteristic of the the Linux ‘cp’ command (using default options).

  • A Linux OS may have been booted from a USB flash drive and the data may have been copied back to the same flash drive, which will likely have been formatted with the Linux (ext4) file system.

  • On September 1, 2016, two months after copying the initial large collection of (alleged) DNC related content (the so-called NGP/VAN data), a subset was transferred to working directories on a system running Windows. The .rar files included in the final 7zip file were built from those working directories.

  • The computer system where the working directories were built had Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) settings in force. Most likely, this system was located somewhere on the East Coast.

  • The .rar files and plain files that eventually end up in the “NGP VAN” 7zip file disclosed by Guccifer 2.0 on 9/13/2016 were likely first copied to a USB flash drive, which served as the source data for the final 7zip file. There is no information to determine when or where the final 7zip file was built.
 
Lefty: "BUT...BUT...BUT... MUH RUSSIAN COLLUSION?"

p_101528432.jpg
 
I don't know about your ISP, but I regularly get download speeds upwards of 150 Mbps.
would still depend on how the DNC server was setup. your download speed is cool and all but its more an issue of what the server will allow down that would happen next and/or if the connections were throttled.

however, i do agree to say it's more likely internal than external based on 23mpbs is kinda presumptuous.
 
I don't know about your ISP, but I regularly get download speeds upwards of 150 Mbps.
would still depend on how the DNC server was setup. your download speed is cool and all but its more an issue of what the server will allow down that would happen next and/or if the connections were throttled.

however, i do agree to say it's more likely internal than external based on 23mpbs is kinda presumptuous.
It's MegaBytes/sec, not Megabits/sec
 
Time to get real snowflakes, American Intelligence has made it perfectly clear who hacked DNC and why.
Keep the faith. You might need it.

LOL. Very ironic considering your position is based on some internet blogger bullshit with a side of conspiracy theories, while mine is based on the unanimous, official findings of American Intelligence agencies.
 
I don't know about your ISP, but I regularly get download speeds upwards of 150 Mbps.
would still depend on how the DNC server was setup. your download speed is cool and all but its more an issue of what the server will allow down that would happen next and/or if the connections were throttled.

however, i do agree to say it's more likely internal than external based on 23mpbs is kinda presumptuous.
It's doubtful that the DNC would have an internet account that would allow high upload speeds. Most the the upload speeds the ISP provide to normal customers is far lower than the download speeds the allow. To get accounts with high upload speeds you have to pay a lot more, and why would the DNC require such service?
 
Looks like everything is about to unravel exposing what really happened with the DNC server. This makes the best sense yet of what happened.


BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally—Not Hacked
I was wondering when they would look at the source coding... SO this was done by staff who had access to the server and passwords. I wonder if this has links to Seth and his suspicious demise?

The Gayeway Pundit?? Fake news source spewing alt right conspiracy theories.
 
I don't know about your ISP, but I regularly get download speeds upwards of 150 Mbps.
would still depend on how the DNC server was setup. your download speed is cool and all but its more an issue of what the server will allow down that would happen next and/or if the connections were throttled.

however, i do agree to say it's more likely internal than external based on 23mpbs is kinda presumptuous.
It's doubtful that the DNC would have an internet account that would allow high upload speeds. Most the the upload speeds the ISP provide to normal customers is far lower than the download speeds the allow. To get accounts with high upload speeds you have to pay a lot more, and why would the DNC require such service?
that's a good counterpoint. i didn't consider they were merely using something like uverse or twc. in that light your best "upload speed" is around 6mb. download may be 100 but that doesn't mean a thing on the servers upload speed.

forgot about that one while i misuse acronyms. :)
 
Breaking Update

David Duke exposes more evidence about the copied files

Twitter

Just in case someone doesn't know who David Duke is:

David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is an American white nationalist, politician, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust denier, convicted felon, and former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Bring grainy salt to this party.
What a noble patriot he is.

A lying piece of racist shit. And a huge fan of Donald J. Trump, who gave his endorsement early on.
 
Time to get real snowflakes, American Intelligence has made it perfectly clear who hacked DNC and why.
Keep the faith. You might need it.

LOL. Very ironic considering your position is based on some internet blogger bullshit with a side of conspiracy theories, while mine is based on the unanimous, official findings of American Intelligence agencies.
I see you can't debunk The Forensicators evidence he's provided in specifics
 
15th post
Time to get real snowflakes, American Intelligence has made it perfectly clear who hacked DNC and why.
Keep the faith. You might need it.

LOL. Very ironic considering your position is based on some internet blogger bullshit with a side of conspiracy theories, while mine is based on the unanimous, official findings of American Intelligence agencies.
I see you can't debunk The Forensicators evidence he's provided in specifics

The Foresicator??? This guy never touched the DNC server and has no "evidence". This is just more lies from a website with a long history of fake news stories, including "Pizzagate".

You lying turds are going to get people killed if you don't stop with the bullshit. David Duke is a convicted felon, and had DJT continued to fight the Trump University lawsuits, he would be too.

Your country is in the toilet and the waters are swirling and you're still on about Clinton's email server.

What an idiot you are.
 
Breaking Update

David Duke exposes more evidence about the copied files

Twitter

Just in case someone doesn't know who David Duke is:

David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is an American white nationalist, politician, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust denier, convicted felon, and former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Bring grainy salt to this party.
What a noble patriot he is.

A lying piece of racist shit. And a huge fan of Donald J. Trump, who gave his endorsement early on.
Liar.David Duke never gave Donald Trump his endorsement. In his own words.

.
 
Breaking Update

David Duke exposes more evidence about the copied files

Twitter

Just in case someone doesn't know who David Duke is:

David Ernest Duke (born July 1, 1950) is an American white nationalist, politician, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Holocaust denier, convicted felon, and former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

Bring grainy salt to this party.
What a noble patriot he is.

A lying piece of racist shit. And a huge fan of Donald J. Trump, who gave his endorsement early on.
Liar.David Duke never gave Donald Trump his endorsement. In his own words.

.


Wow. How ******* stupid are you?

David-Duke-01-tweet.png


1024x1024.jpg
 
Time to get real snowflakes, American Intelligence has made it perfectly clear who hacked DNC and why.
Keep the faith. You might need it.

LOL. Very ironic considering your position is based on some internet blogger bullshit with a side of conspiracy theories, while mine is based on the unanimous, official findings of American Intelligence agencies.
1. 4 out of 17 is not unanimous.
2. I don't need Trump to be innocent like the haters need him to be guilty. Get rid of him and we get Pence. Not a bad deal.
3. Very convenient that the actual servers were not inspected by the FBI.

Like I said, keep the faith. Keep digging, all kinds of fun stuff is coming out. Before it's all said and done, Hillary will be up to her eyeballs in foreign dealings. It'll be fun.
 
Back
Top Bottom