Boasberg’s Judicial Coup Update: Judge Gives President Trump Deadline of Tuesday for Compliance

I disagree with that interpretation.

Which if fine. You are free to do so.

The Law states a "war" or an "invasion" would both not require judicial review.

No the law doesn't say that. See below.

It doesn't just say "during a declared war".

Correct, the other triggering entity is a Foreign Nation/Government.

We are not in a declared war and the government of Venezuela didn't invade US Territory.

WW
.
.
.


1742987624481.webp
 
Which if fine. You are free to do so.



No the law doesn't say that. See below.



Correct, the other triggering entity is a Foreign Nation/Government.

We are not in a declared war and the government of Venezuela didn't invade US Territory.

WW
.
.
.


View attachment 1093625
I'd like to commend you for your restless support of your CRIMINAL TERRORIST ILLEGAL ALIENS.
I demand that you continue with that all the way to the midterms.
Let the American People know how much you don't care about them. Repeat it OFTEN AND LOUDLY!!!!!!!
WOOOOOOT!!!!!!! :rock:
 
Which if fine. You are free to do so.

No the law doesn't say that. See below.

Correct, the other triggering entity is a Foreign Nation/Government.

We are not in a declared war and the government of Venezuela didn't invade US Territory. WW
We disagree on whether Venezuela sending TdA or Mexico's "failed-state" sending MS-13 are state-sponsored invasions.

They are definitely "predatory incursions" (by 600,000 convicted criminals).

We'll see how the USSC interprets the Alien Enemies Act.
 
I'd like to commend you for your restless support of your CRIMINAL TERRORIST ILLEGAL ALIENS.
I demand that you continue with that all the way to the midterms.
Let the American People know how much you don't care about them. Repeat it OFTEN AND LOUDLY!!!!!!!
WOOOOOOT!!!!!!! :rock:

I don't support criminal terrorist illegal aliens.

I'm fine with them being arrested, confined for public safety, receive due process.

If they are criminals, then have a trial, convict them and SEND THEM THEM to prison. Only deport them AFTER they have served their senteance after receiving Due Process.

And the Judge in this case has not stopped the arrest, detainment, and deportation under other sections of the United States Code. The judge simple ordered that Trumps action violate the law he claimed.

WW
 
Which if fine. You are free to do so.



No the law doesn't say that. See below.



Correct, the other triggering entity is a Foreign Nation/Government.

We are not in a declared war and the government of Venezuela didn't invade US Territory.

WW
.
.
.


View attachment 1093625
I'm surprised you know that, as relentlessly as Democratic policitians and the media is lying about that.

TDA is a terrorist gang that was founded in prison. Send them to our prisons and you put at risk not only the prisonersd and guards already there, but it is more dangerous for them, since they will not have the strict discipline they will in El Salvador.

How many lives of American corrections officers is this debate about whether TDA is a hostile foreign entity released to the United States by the government of Venezuala?

Just a number, then explain all you like.
 
Last edited:
I don't support criminal terrorist illegal aliens.

I'm fine with them being arrested, confined for public safety, receive due process.

If they are criminals, then have a trial, convict them and SEND THEM THEM to prison. Only deport them AFTER they have served their senteance after receiving Due Process.

And the Judge in this case has not stopped the arrest, detainment, and deportation under other sections of the United States Code. The judge simple ordered that Trumps action violate the law he claimed.

WW
Keep up the great work. 🤡
 
We disagree on whether Venezuela sending TdA or Mexico's "failed-state" sending MS-13 are state-sponsored invasions.

I'm fully willing to review any evidence presented in court as part of the decision making process by the District Judges, the Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court as to the validity of Trumps claims that the government of Venezuala engineered an invasion.

WW
 
I'm surprised you know that, as relentlessly as Democratic policitians and the media is lying about that.

You'd be surprised at the things I know.

I could tell you, but then I'd have to end your life.

;)

WW
 
I'm fully willing to review any evidence presented in court as part of the decision making process by the District Judges, the Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court as to the validity of Trumps claims that the government of Venezuela engineered an invasion.
WW
Actually no, I think that the DOJ is now saying that district judges don't have standing per the Act, so a higher court would need to rule.
 
I disagree with that interpretation.
The Law states a "war" or an "invasion" would both not require judicial review.
It doesn't just say "only during a declared war".
Our opinions don't count.

We will see what SCOTUS does with it.
 
I'd like to commend you for your restless support of your CRIMINAL TERRORIST ILLEGAL ALIENS.
I demand that you continue with that all the way to the midterms.
Let the American People know how much you don't care about them. Repeat it OFTEN AND LOUDLY!!!!!!!
WOOOOOOT!!!!!!! :rock:
You hate the law. That may be criminal and terroristic; it is of no import.
 
15th post
Actually no, I think that the DOJ is now saying that district judges don't have standing per the Act, so a higher court would need to rule.

And they are welcome to appeal the TRO, but it remains in place pending appeal.

There was a hearing just yesterday for the Appeals court on whether the TRO will stay in place pending a full hearing on the merits.

So a higher court should be issuing their decision today, or at the latest Friday.

WW
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom