BLM: Oink Oink, Bang Bang

[Weatherman2020]

Time to round up the terrorists of BLM and give them a one way ticket to Sudan.

 

[westwall]

Time to round up the terrorists of BLM and give them a one way ticket to Sudan.

View attachment 81912

It's certainly time to classify them as a terrorist organization.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

So Sarah Palin was responsible for the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords?

 

[Ravi]

BLM had nothing to do with Dallas and in all likelihood nothing to do with Baton Rouge.

 

[owebo]

So Sarah Palin was responsible for the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords?

I believe the liberals told us it was the scope crosshairs she lifted from a liberal add that caused it....

Kinda like pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon.....

 

[westwall]

BLM had nothing to do with Dallas and in all likelihood nothing to do with Baton Rouge.

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

 

[Timmy]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Time to round up the terrorists of BLM and give them a one way ticket to Sudan.

View attachment 81912

It's certainly time to classify them as a terrorist organization.

Then treat them as such

 

[owebo]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

We take all you liberals posts as super racist....you did invent the kkk after all.....

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

You're going down a very slippery slope that could have devastating consequences for the First Amendment. One, we don't even know who the shooter is or their motivation. Two, even if it turns out it is a revenge shooting and is affiliated with BLM or the NBPP, are you saying individuals are no longer responsible for their own actions?

 

[westwall]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

Feel free to post up pictures of rightwingers calling for the murder of cops.

 

[Ravi]

BLM had nothing to do with Dallas and in all likelihood nothing to do with Baton Rouge.

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

BLM has done no such thing.

 

[westwall]

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

You're going down a very slippery slope that could have devastating consequences for the First Amendment. One, we don't even know who the shooter is or their motivation. Two, even if it turns out it is a revenge shooting and is affiliated with BLM or the NBPP, are you saying individuals are no longer responsible for their own actions?

Not really. Inciting to riot is one of those things not covered by the 1st Amendment. People are allowed to "peacefully gather". Nowhere does it say they are free to call for the death of people. Of course the shooter is ultimately responsible for their actions, however, those who incite others to commit murder are every bit as culpable. When i was a younger man I can still remember the professional agitators stirring up the masses to do their attacks and before the police were able to respond they would melt away to watch and monitor the results of their work.

 

[Timmy]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

We take all you liberals posts as super racist....you did invent the kkk after all.....

Liberals did not invent the kkk. Tell me , where was the klan established ?

 

[owebo]

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

You're going down a very slippery slope that could have devastating consequences for the First Amendment. One, we don't even know who the shooter is or their motivation. Two, even if it turns out it is a revenge shooting and is affiliated with BLM or the NBPP, are you saying individuals are no longer responsible for their own actions?

The constitution was set up to curb mob rule....mobs have no rights other that what the majority decides until such time the mob is no longer a mob....the matter will soon be in we the people's hands it seems....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

We take all you liberals posts as super racist....you did invent the kkk after all.....

Liberals did not invent the kkk. Tell me , where was the klan established ?

You're right Timmy,liberals didnt invent the KKK.
Democrats did.

 

[owebo]

Ohhh a post on the internet ! We surely can't fond some right winger with a super racist post ! And then take him as speaking for all conservatives !

We take all you liberals posts as super racist....you did invent the kkk after all.....

Liberals did not invent the kkk. Tell me , where was the klan established ?

 

[jwoodie]

You're going down a very slippery slope that could have devastating consequences for the First Amendment.

Apparently, you are already at rock bottom, believing that inciting violence is (or should be) protected speech. As long as it isn't directed at you, of course.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Actually they do. They and the NBPP together have been calling for the wholesale murder of police. Thus, even if they aren't on hand when the foul deed is done, they ARE in no small part responsible.

You're going down a very slippery slope that could have devastating consequences for the First Amendment. One, we don't even know who the shooter is or their motivation. Two, even if it turns out it is a revenge shooting and is affiliated with BLM or the NBPP, are you saying individuals are no longer responsible for their own actions?

If a white carried a sign at an Obama speech saying "Obama, Bang Bang", how many seconds before the Secret Service had him hog tied and whisked off to a secret location?
First Amendment has boundaries.

 

[Weatherman2020]

So Sarah Palin was responsible for the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords?

You're a moron.