Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Eh, since you are Muslim, you justify lying to me. I need a penny to toss - heads you're not lying, tails you are. Boring, as there is nothing intellectual or even challenging about debating with one who justify lies. The 'integrity' of debate, by default, is not there (and fully supported by your numerous lies and ad hominems).
I prefer Charmin.
I'm sure you've seen plenty of that from behind, dude. Spare me the details.Sure is, i have seen many a muslim with shit in their pants.That's the voice of experience speaking right there.
Revolution Muslim - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJust so we're clear, you're claiming that this blog is representative of 1.5 billion people? "Abu Talhah al Amrikee" (Zachary A. Chesser) and the head of the group, "Yusuf Khattab" (Joseph Cohen, former Jewish extremist/Israeli settler,) are overzealous converts who are given a voice by bigoted morons like you. Go back to lighting your farts on fire or whatever it is that you dipshits do while waiting for an excuse to vilify Muslims.
Your book of your religion justifies lying to me, an infidel - several entries.Eh, since you are Muslim, you justify lying to me. I need a penny to toss - heads you're not lying, tails you are. Boring, as there is nothing intellectual or even challenging about debating with one who justify lies. The 'integrity' of debate, by default, is not there (and fully supported by your numerous lies and ad hominems).
Any insults of mine followed your vilification of Islam. I've never justified "lying" to you as you well know; you wouldn't be worth the effort even if it wasn't forbidden for me to do so outside of war and other specific circumstances. False accusations of dishonesty demonstrate your unwillingness to carry on an intelligent discussion, though that had already been made evident by your many litanies of childish comments regarding Islam.
Exactly.I prefer Charmin.
I applaud the unique use of the "thup" smilie.
Kalam, I cannot believe you are swallowing this bait.
It is unfortunate that no Islamic nation serves as a leader.
Without this, the entire religion is defined by their worst elements.
The Qur'an? Please, don't hesitate to be more specific.Your book of your religion justifies lying to me, an infidel - several entries.
It sure sounds like you want me to. Islamophobia always seems to be accompanied by a persecution complex.I bet you want to call me a ****, yet again, and blame me for your doing so.
You wouldn't know.You're a good little Muslim - a great ambassador for your religion.
I didnt saw
What bait? Xenophon's second-rate trolling or Si Modo's credulous acceptance of any and all defamatory claims about Islam? If I held myself above discussions like this, I wouldn't frequent USMB in the first place.Kalam, I cannot believe you are swallowing this bait.
I disagree. Centralization of religious authority is never a good thing; it stifles creative thought. We were told from the beginning that Islam's destiny was division into many schools of belief, so this heterogeneity and the marketplace of ideas it creates are things that should be embraced. To give one person or group authority over all religious matters is to entrust them with a power that belongs solely to God. The legitimacy of such a system died along with the final prophet (SAWS.)It is unfortunate that no Islamic nation serves as a leader.
Only in ignorant minds.Without this, the entire religion is defined by their worst elements.
There was no trolling you medival moron, there is only mockery of you and the backward nonsense you try to kill people over.What bait? Xenophon's second-rate trolling
For the record
(Sorry Kalam)
I disagree. Centralization of religious authority is never a good thing; it stifles creative thought. We were told from the beginning that Islam's destiny was division into many schools of belief, so this heterogeneity and the marketplace of ideas it creates are things that should be embraced. To give one person or group authority over all religious matters is to entrust them with a power that belongs solely to God. The legitimacy of such a system died along with the final prophet (SAWS.)It is unfortunate that no Islamic nation serves as a leader.
Only in ignorant minds.Without this, the entire religion is defined by their worst elements.
They wouldn't get far with us, I assure you.Ok, "only in ignorant minds."
Ignorant Minds have Exterminated Millions.
In that case, I apologize for misinterpreting your post. I'll assume that you mean violent threats against non-combatants. Still, this raises several issues. Having one nation at the helm of the religion would be inappropriate, because Islamists reject the notion that Muslims should be divided by political boundaries in the first place. The call would have to come from a scholar, which brings us back to the issue of decentralization. No single scholar or body of scholars exercises influence over a large enough portion of believers to speak for the entire religion (though that doesn't stop them from attempting to do so.) Secondly, any person or group who is "vigorously" devoted to denouncing threats runs the risk of being disregarded as a stooge of the West. Thirdly, I don't think it makes sense to hold the entire religion accountable when a single person posts a threatening remark on a blog. This incident doesn't deserve the amount of attention it's receiving; death threats are issued on the internet every day and nobody has time to monitor and condemn every one of them.My point wasn't to suggest there should be an "Islamic Pope."
My point was to suggest that some Islamic country lead others in vigorously condemning Islamists that resort to violent threats against anyone, including South Park Producers.
