Black/white politic manipulations

[rupol2000]

In anthropology and racial studies, the concept of "white" and the synonyms "Caucasion" and "Europid" do not refer to people with fair skin, but to the Nordic type of European inhabitant.
Most likely, this type originated from the mixing of the true black type of the African Bushman and the Cromanid, perhaps it happened through the Mediterranean race, closely related to the Nordic.. Anthropologically, it is similar to the African black, has a gracial skeleton and dolichocephalic skull, but a different, orthogonal type of facial profiling and a more massive jaw.
The color of his skin is extremely depigmented, this is a consequence of a violation of the production of melanin, so he almost does not tan.
Skin color from the point of view of scientific anthropology is an unstable and insignificant sign.

Modern ideas about races are based on the antiscientific theory of Gobineau, who divided races on the basis of melanin and tried to prove the origin of the Indo-Europeans from the Nordids on this basis.

In the United States, the Nordic type is very poorly represented, most Americans are of Siberian descent, the male Q line is a side branch of the Proto-Indo-Europeans from haplogroup P.
Female genetics also come from Asia.
The anthropological type is not Nordic.

Respectively

1) American fair skinned race is not "white"

2) African Americans, if we consider them to be from Africa, are anthropologically closer to the "white race" than the main "white" population to "white race".
PS although it should be noted here that American blacks are not really quite similar to African blacks, they are probably of different origins or they are highly mixed

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

You should provide a link with scientific references

 

[rupol2000]

You should provide a link with scientific references

I now find it difficult to give a specific link, since I studied this for a long time, but you can read Carleton Stevens Coon's opinion on the origin of the Nordids, it roughly corresponds to what is said here

 

[rupol2000]

You should provide a link with scientific references

Joseph Deniker [...] defined nordique by a set of physical characteristics: the concurrence of somewhat wavy hair, light eyes, reddish skin, tall stature and a dolichocephalic skull.[9] Of six 'Caucasian' groups Deniker accommodated four into secondary ethnic groups, all of which he considered intermediate to the Nordic: Northwestern, Sub-Nordic, Vistulaand Sub-Adriatic

1. Deniker, J. - Les Races de l'Europe (1899);The Races of Man (London: Walter Scott Ltd., 1900);Les Races et les Peuples de la Terre (Masson et Cie, Paris, 1926)
2. ^ Deniker (J.) "Essai d'une classification des races humaines, basée uniquement sur les caractères physiques". Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris. Volume 12 Numéro 12. 1889. pp. 320-336.

(wiki)

 

[rupol2000]

In addition, the anthropological similarity of African blacks, Mediterranean and Nordics is unambiguous, and it in itself proves kinship.

 

[rupol2000]

in Bushmen, by the way, dolichocephaly is even more pronounced than in Nordids
And they have orhtognathism too

 

[Unkotare]

Joseph Deniker [...] defined nordique by a set of physical characteristics: the concurrence of somewhat wavy hair, light eyes, reddish skin, tall stature and a dolichocephalic skull.[9] Of six 'Caucasian' groups Deniker accommodated four into secondary ethnic groups, all of which he considered intermediate to the Nordic: Northwestern, Sub-Nordic, Vistulaand Sub-Adriatic

1. Deniker, J. - Les Races de l'Europe (1899);The Races of Man (London: Walter Scott Ltd., 1900);Les Races et les Peuples de la Terre (Masson et Cie, Paris, 1926)
2. ^ Deniker (J.) "Essai d'une classification des races humaines, basée uniquement sur les caractères physiques". Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris. Volume 12 Numéro 12. 1889. pp. 320-336.

(wiki)

"Wiki"

 

[rupol2000]

"Wiki"

there are links to sources