- Moderator
- #141
You are so much of a moron, that you can't even see that not only are my statements "fact based" (although not according to your simple-minded, and limited definition of "facts"), my facts are also very OBVIOUS facts - to anyone not programmed into liberal mind control.You're a liberal, and like all other liberals, you're programmed to see society by way of statistical "information", rather than seeing life going on right before your eyes.See what I mean folks? There it is. Plain as day. Yet another liberal demand for "statistical proof". Haha. So if a liberal think tank, liberal media, or liberal university doesn't say so, in an "official" report, then it just ain't so, according to katstupe, and every other liberal. This is how their minds work, and what they confine themselves to.You are a pathological, delusional, disingenuous liar.
I never stated that NO blacks have ever benefitted from affirmative action.
In fact, two of your conservative heroes, Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas both did a long time ago.
I stated that it HAS NOT been on the scale that you allege that it has.
In your non functioning mind, ANY black person who has experienced ANY degree of success, HAD to be at the expense of a white person, which is complete made up bullshit on your part.
When the law was passed, it certainly did not change anything overnight.
Even a feeble minded moron like you should know that.
There is no statistical proof that whites were displaced in college admissions, the workforce or even in the acquisition of business loans by blacks on a large scale because of AA.
The comparative percentage of blacks in America who are admitted to colleges, hold positions of responsibility in the workforce and even those who obtain business loans DOES NOT reflect what you claim.
But it IS a documented fact that after AA went into effect and gender was incorporated into the law, white females benefitted from it more than any other demographic, and have since.
Now, what lie are you going to tell next, "Pinnochio"?
Never mind the REAL proof of REALITY, in the form of thousands of people working in VA hospitals and govt job offices. Never mind that you couldn't find a white male employee there, if your life depended on it. Nope. To libs like ks, that doesn't qualify as "proof". Not when he's got all that "statistical proof" (from liberal sources) that his liberal mentors have programmed him to flash at us.
As for the white females benefitting from AA, I have refuted that dopey, hollow talking point so many times I've lost count. Once again, white females beneficiaries of AA are a tiny % of all white females who are victims by virtue of their white male husbands, fathers, and sons, and this includes the white female recipients of AA, who are both beneficiaries and victims, simultaneously.
I'm not a liberal, you dunce.
Statistical information is what the country runs on you idiot.
Just because you have an "opinion" that does not make it a fact.
You would look much less stupid than you are if you provided FACTS as opposed to what you imagine to be true.
You sound like the kind of nut that has never read a book or are even a part of real society.
And you can try appealing to "others" to support your idiocy if you wish.
So far, no one is.
If somebody asked you to prove fish can swim, you'd go look up some reports somewhere. You guys don't realize how bent you are.You're a liberal, and like all other liberals, you're programmed to see society by way of statistical "information", rather than seeing life going on right before your eyes.See what I mean folks? There it is. Plain as day. Yet another liberal demand for "statistical proof". Haha. So if a liberal think tank, liberal media, or liberal university doesn't say so, in an "official" report, then it just ain't so, according to katstupe, and every other liberal. This is how their minds work, and what they confine themselves to.You are a pathological, delusional, disingenuous liar.
I never stated that NO blacks have ever benefitted from affirmative action.
In fact, two of your conservative heroes, Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas both did a long time ago.
I stated that it HAS NOT been on the scale that you allege that it has.
In your non functioning mind, ANY black person who has experienced ANY degree of success, HAD to be at the expense of a white person, which is complete made up bullshit on your part.
When the law was passed, it certainly did not change anything overnight.
Even a feeble minded moron like you should know that.
There is no statistical proof that whites were displaced in college admissions, the workforce or even in the acquisition of business loans by blacks on a large scale because of AA.
The comparative percentage of blacks in America who are admitted to colleges, hold positions of responsibility in the workforce and even those who obtain business loans DOES NOT reflect what you claim.
But it IS a documented fact that after AA went into effect and gender was incorporated into the law, white females benefitted from it more than any other demographic, and have since.
Now, what lie are you going to tell next, "Pinnochio"?
Never mind the REAL proof of REALITY, in the form of thousands of people working in VA hospitals and govt job offices. Never mind that you couldn't find a white male employee there, if your life depended on it. Nope. To libs like ks, that doesn't qualify as "proof". Not when he's got all that "statistical proof" (from liberal sources) that his liberal mentors have programmed him to flash at us.
As for the white females benefitting from AA, I have refuted that dopey, hollow talking point so many times I've lost count. Once again, white females beneficiaries of AA are a tiny % of all white females who are victims by virtue of their white male husbands, fathers, and sons, and this includes the white female recipients of AA, who are both beneficiaries and victims, simultaneously.
I'm not a liberal, you dunce.
Statistical information is what the country runs on you idiot.
Just because you have an "opinion" that does not make it a fact.
You would look much less stupid than you are if you provided FACTS as opposed to what you imagine to be true.
You sound like the kind of nut that has never read a book or are even a part of real society.
And you can try appealing to "others" to support your idiocy if you wish.
So far, no one is.
If somebody asked you to prove fish can swim, you'd go look up some reports somewhere. You guys don't realize how bent you are.
The fact that I am appalled by your abject stupidity and inability to make a fact based statement does not make me a "liberal", nor am I extreme right wing nutjob like you.
Any fool can throw around numbers like "hundreds of millions", or refer to "small percentages", and be vague, but insist on that they are right, which is your method of circular, childish reasoning.
Anyone knows that "fish can swim", you damn fool, but there is no credible source that supports your ridiculous way of carelessly throwing around numbers like "hundreds of millions" without any proof that they are even nearly correct.
You labeling anyone who calls you out for making statements that are untrue and not based on any sensible fact based information a "liberal" is a weak counterpoin that just further exposes that you are either conscientiously stupid or willfully ignorant...or even worse, BOTH.
So for all you robots out there, unable to see anything beyond your little "statistical proof" (from liberal sources of course), there is nothing MORE "sensible" than ascertaining things with your senses (like your EYES). So when you have gone through dozens of visits to 2 VA hospitals, for years, + 2 govt job centers, and seens thousands of minority employees, and almost no whites, that is the most sensible statistical proof you can ever get, and undeniable, as opposed to agenda-driven, contrived bullshit in liberal "reports", which have little or no fundamental guard against invalidity.
But you are too deep into the programming to figure that basic truth out. Of course hundreds of millions of whites have been victimized by Affirmative Action. It's existed for 59 years, and EVERY white person in America, living through these years has been in the category of benefit denial, whether they applied for that job, college financial aid, etc or not
Counting all whites living from 1961 to 2020, all born, lived, and died during that time, is of course, hundreds of millions. There are almost hundreds of millions of whites (197 million) just living right now in America. God, you are stupid.
You are so much of a moron, that you can't even see that not only are my statements "fact based" (although not according to your simple-minded, and limited definition of "facts"), my facts are also very OBVIOUS facts - to anyone not programmed into liberal mind control.You're a liberal, and like all other liberals, you're programmed to see society by way of statistical "information", rather than seeing life going on right before your eyes.See what I mean folks? There it is. Plain as day. Yet another liberal demand for "statistical proof". Haha. So if a liberal think tank, liberal media, or liberal university doesn't say so, in an "official" report, then it just ain't so, according to katstupe, and every other liberal. This is how their minds work, and what they confine themselves to.You are a pathological, delusional, disingenuous liar.
I never stated that NO blacks have ever benefitted from affirmative action.
In fact, two of your conservative heroes, Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas both did a long time ago.
I stated that it HAS NOT been on the scale that you allege that it has.
In your non functioning mind, ANY black person who has experienced ANY degree of success, HAD to be at the expense of a white person, which is complete made up bullshit on your part.
When the law was passed, it certainly did not change anything overnight.
Even a feeble minded moron like you should know that.
There is no statistical proof that whites were displaced in college admissions, the workforce or even in the acquisition of business loans by blacks on a large scale because of AA.
The comparative percentage of blacks in America who are admitted to colleges, hold positions of responsibility in the workforce and even those who obtain business loans DOES NOT reflect what you claim.
But it IS a documented fact that after AA went into effect and gender was incorporated into the law, white females benefitted from it more than any other demographic, and have since.
Now, what lie are you going to tell next, "Pinnochio"?
Never mind the REAL proof of REALITY, in the form of thousands of people working in VA hospitals and govt job offices. Never mind that you couldn't find a white male employee there, if your life depended on it. Nope. To libs like ks, that doesn't qualify as "proof". Not when he's got all that "statistical proof" (from liberal sources) that his liberal mentors have programmed him to flash at us.
As for the white females benefitting from AA, I have refuted that dopey, hollow talking point so many times I've lost count. Once again, white females beneficiaries of AA are a tiny % of all white females who are victims by virtue of their white male husbands, fathers, and sons, and this includes the white female recipients of AA, who are both beneficiaries and victims, simultaneously.
I'm not a liberal, you dunce.
Statistical information is what the country runs on you idiot.
Just because you have an "opinion" that does not make it a fact.
You would look much less stupid than you are if you provided FACTS as opposed to what you imagine to be true.
You sound like the kind of nut that has never read a book or are even a part of real society.
And you can try appealing to "others" to support your idiocy if you wish.
So far, no one is.
If somebody asked you to prove fish can swim, you'd go look up some reports somewhere. You guys don't realize how bent you are.You're a liberal, and like all other liberals, you're programmed to see society by way of statistical "information", rather than seeing life going on right before your eyes.See what I mean folks? There it is. Plain as day. Yet another liberal demand for "statistical proof". Haha. So if a liberal think tank, liberal media, or liberal university doesn't say so, in an "official" report, then it just ain't so, according to katstupe, and every other liberal. This is how their minds work, and what they confine themselves to.You are a pathological, delusional, disingenuous liar.
I never stated that NO blacks have ever benefitted from affirmative action.
In fact, two of your conservative heroes, Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas both did a long time ago.
I stated that it HAS NOT been on the scale that you allege that it has.
In your non functioning mind, ANY black person who has experienced ANY degree of success, HAD to be at the expense of a white person, which is complete made up bullshit on your part.
When the law was passed, it certainly did not change anything overnight.
Even a feeble minded moron like you should know that.
There is no statistical proof that whites were displaced in college admissions, the workforce or even in the acquisition of business loans by blacks on a large scale because of AA.
The comparative percentage of blacks in America who are admitted to colleges, hold positions of responsibility in the workforce and even those who obtain business loans DOES NOT reflect what you claim.
But it IS a documented fact that after AA went into effect and gender was incorporated into the law, white females benefitted from it more than any other demographic, and have since.
Now, what lie are you going to tell next, "Pinnochio"?
Never mind the REAL proof of REALITY, in the form of thousands of people working in VA hospitals and govt job offices. Never mind that you couldn't find a white male employee there, if your life depended on it. Nope. To libs like ks, that doesn't qualify as "proof". Not when he's got all that "statistical proof" (from liberal sources) that his liberal mentors have programmed him to flash at us.
As for the white females benefitting from AA, I have refuted that dopey, hollow talking point so many times I've lost count. Once again, white females beneficiaries of AA are a tiny % of all white females who are victims by virtue of their white male husbands, fathers, and sons, and this includes the white female recipients of AA, who are both beneficiaries and victims, simultaneously.
I'm not a liberal, you dunce.
Statistical information is what the country runs on you idiot.
Just because you have an "opinion" that does not make it a fact.
You would look much less stupid than you are if you provided FACTS as opposed to what you imagine to be true.
You sound like the kind of nut that has never read a book or are even a part of real society.
And you can try appealing to "others" to support your idiocy if you wish.
So far, no one is.
If somebody asked you to prove fish can swim, you'd go look up some reports somewhere. You guys don't realize how bent you are.
The fact that I am appalled by your abject stupidity and inability to make a fact based statement does not make me a "liberal", nor am I extreme right wing nutjob like you.
Any fool can throw around numbers like "hundreds of millions", or refer to "small percentages", and be vague, but insist on that they are right, which is your method of circular, childish reasoning.
Anyone knows that "fish can swim", you damn fool, but there is no credible source that supports your ridiculous way of carelessly throwing around numbers like "hundreds of millions" without any proof that they are even nearly correct.
You labeling anyone who calls you out for making statements that are untrue and not based on any sensible fact based information a "liberal" is a weak counterpoin that just further exposes that you are either conscientiously stupid or willfully ignorant...or even worse, BOTH.
So for all you robots out there, unable to see anything beyond your little "statistical proof" (from liberal sources of course), there is nothing MORE "sensible" than ascertaining things with your senses (like your EYES). So when you have gone through dozens of visits to 2 VA hospitals, for years, + 2 govt job centers, and seens thousands of minority employees, and almost no whites, that is the most sensible statistical proof you can ever get, and undeniable, as opposed to agenda-driven, contrived bullshit in liberal "reports", which have little or no fundamental guard against invalidity.
But you are too deep into the programming to figure that basic truth out. Of course hundreds of millions of whites have been victimized by Affirmative Action. It's existed for 59 years, and EVERY white person in America, living through these years has been in the category of benefit denial, whether they applied for that job, college financial aid, etc or not
Counting all whites living from 1961 to 2020, all born, lived, and died during that time, is of course, hundreds of millions. There are almost hundreds of millions of whites (197 million) just living right now in America. God, you are stupid.
Isn't it bedtime in the asylum yet? Everyone knows the population totals, just like everyone (except you) realizes that EVERYONE of any race has not benefitted nore suffered from one single law that was signed into effect.
In 1961, black citizens did not even have the same basic rights of citizenship in southern states as white citizens, and affirmative action had not even been fully implemented.
Government statistics do not support your delusional lies.
According to the U.S. Commerce Department, there are 2.6 million unemployed Black civilians and 114 million employed White civilians (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2011). Thus, even if every unemployed Black worker in the United States were to displace a White worker, only 2% of Whites would be affected. Furthermore, affirmative action pertains only to job-qualified applicants, so the actual percentage of affected Whites would be even smaller. The main sources of job loss among White workers have to do with factory relocations and labor contracting outside the United States, computerization and automation, and corporate downsizing