Biology Says That Two People With The Same Gender Cannot Procreate

[ReinyDays]

the electricity will have a veto power over that.

Adapters have step-down transformers ... and yeah they tingle ... that's how they work ...

Sounds to me like you've never had sex with a man before ...

 

[martybegan]

Adapters have step-down transformers ... and yeah they tingle ... that's how they work ...

Sounds to me like you've never had sex with a man before ...

Sounds like you are right.

 

[Road Runner]

No? Why not?

It's just not natural.

From a scientific perspective, homosexuality is considered a normal variation of human sexuality. Here are some reasons why:

• Biological basis: Research suggests that homosexuality has a biological basis, with studies pointing to genetic, hormonal, and neurological factors that contribute to an individual's sexual orientation. For example, studies have found that identical twins are more likely to share the same sexual orientation than fraternal twins, suggesting a possible genetic link.
• Prevalence in nature: Homosexuality is not unique to humans and has been observed in many animal species, including mammals, birds, and insects. This suggests that same-sex attraction is a natural part of the animal kingdom.
• Brain structure and function: Studies have found that the brains of gay men and lesbians differ from those of straight individuals in certain ways, such as in the structure and function of the hypothalamus and amygdala. These differences are not necessarily "abnormal" but rather a natural variation of human brain development.
• Evolutionary perspective: Some scientists argue that homosexuality may have evolved as a way to promote social bonding and cooperation within groups, rather than solely for reproductive purposes.
• Lack of evidence for "choice": There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that homosexuality is a "choice" or a result of environmental factors, such as upbringing or social conditioning.
• American Psychological Association (APA) stance: The APA has stated that "homosexuality is a normal and positive variation of human sexual orientation" and that "there is no empirical evidence to support the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder."

Overall, the scientific consensus is that homosexuality is a normal and natural part of human diversity, and that it is not a disorder or a choice.

The idea that God hates LGBTQ+ people is a common misconception that is often based on a misinterpretation of certain biblical passages. Many Christian denominations and interpretations of the Bible have been used to justify discrimination and marginalization of LGBTQ+ individuals.

However, it's essential to note that:

1. The Bible is open to interpretation: Different Christian denominations and scholars have varying interpretations of the same biblical passages. Some interpretations are more inclusive and accepting of LGBTQ+ individuals, while others are more restrictive.
2. Context matters: Many biblical passages that are often cited as condemning homosexuality were written in a specific cultural and historical context that is different from our own. For example, the concept of "homosexuality" as we understand it today did not exist in ancient times.
3. Jesus' teachings emphasize love and acceptance: Jesus' teachings in the New Testament emphasize the importance of love, compassion, and acceptance. He often challenged the social norms and conventions of his time, and his message of love and inclusion is central to Christian theology.

Some examples of biblical passages that are often cited as condemning homosexuality include:

• Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: These passages in the Old Testament prohibit male same-sex relationships, but they are part of a larger set of laws that also prohibit other behaviors, such as eating shellfish or wearing mixed fabrics.
• Romans 1:26-27: This passage in the New Testament describes same-sex relationships as "unnatural," but it is often interpreted as a critique of pagan Roman culture rather than a condemnation of LGBTQ+ individuals.
• 1 Corinthians 6:9-10: This passage lists "men who have sex with men" among those who will not inherit the kingdom of God, but it is often translated and interpreted in different ways.

On the other hand, many biblical passages emphasize the importance of love, acceptance, and inclusion, such as:

• Matthew 22:37-40: Jesus teaches that the greatest commandment is to love God and to love one's neighbor as oneself.
• Galatians 3:28: The apostle Paul writes that "there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
• 1 John 4:7-8: The apostle John writes that "love comes from God" and that "whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love."

Many Christians believe that God loves and accepts all people, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Love and acceptance of people doesn't mean that they love their sin. Jesus is no exception to this.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It's just not natural.

What's not natural ? Kids having married parents which affords them legal protection and security?

 

[Road Runner]

What's not natural ? Kids having married parents which affords them legal protection and security?

No. Having two moms or two dads.

 

[daveman]

That's an extremely weak attempt at deflection.

No, it's far more likely that your analogy was simply fucked up.

They usually are.

 

[Road Runner]

No, it's far more likely that your analogy was simply fucked up.

They usually are.

He's got nothing.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

No. Having two moms or two dads.

That is your opinion not shared by most . Is your opinion sufficient to deprive children of the legal protection of having married parents? Yes or no.

 

[Road Runner]

Because you say so?

No because the Bible and nature says so.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

No because the Bible and nature says so.

I don;t care what the bible says and and your wrong about nature . Try dealing with reality

 

[Hollie]

And your point is what , exactly? There are many heterosexual couples who can't procreate either for various reasons. What does that make them?

It makes them unable to have kids for various reasons, you are confused about hundreds of thousands of years of mammalian biology. Did you not attend 7th grade?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It makes them unable to have kids for various reasons, you are confused about hundreds of thousands of years of mammalian biology. Did you not attend 7th grade?

There seems to be something seriously wrong with you. I was commenting on the moronic OP assertion that the fact that a same sex couple can’t have a child one on one somehow “proves that that relationship is wrong and un-natural. My point is , if the ability to procreate as a couple is the standard for a valid and “natural relationship, should we not apply that same standard to heterosexual couples who cant have children the “natural way” ​

I know very well how babies are made so spar me your inane condescending bullshit about biology and answer the question

 

[Hollie]

​

There seems to be something seriously wrong with you. I was commenting on the moronic OP assertion that the fact that a same sex couple can’t have a child one on one somehow “proves that that relationship is wrong and un-natural. My point is , if the ability to procreate as a couple is the standard for a valid and “natural relationship, should we not apply that same standard to heterosexual couples who cant have children the “natural way”​

I know very well how babies are made so spar me your inane condescending bullshit about biology and answer the question

What a pointless attempt at analogy. Heterosexual couples who can’t have children can result from infertility related to hormone levels or a low sperm count in the male. We don’t dismiss hundreds of thousands of years of mammalian biology because of a hormone deficiency. What is concerning is the leftist idea that men can get pregnant. Leftists are apparently grotesquely ignorant about biology which is why we have ridiculous notions of men who menstruate and can bear children.

 

[ReinyDays]

What a pointless attempt at analogy. Heterosexual couples who can’t have children can result from infertility related to hormone levels or a low sperm count in the male. We don’t dismiss hundreds of thousands of years of mammalian biology because of a hormone deficiency. What is concerning is the leftist idea that men can get pregnant. Leftists are apparently grotesquely ignorant about biology which is why we have ridiculous notions of men who menstruate and can bear children.

It's all about chromosome count ...

I just wanted to make the point that couples who can't have children are evolutionary dead ends ... if you believe in that stuff ... their genes don't get passed on ... I'm glad humanity allows them to adopt and become parents anyway ...

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

What a pointless attempt at analogy. Heterosexual couples who can’t have children can result from infertility related to hormone levels or a low sperm count in the male. We don’t dismiss hundreds of thousands of years of mammalian biology because of a hormone deficiency. What is concerning is the leftist idea that men can get pregnant. Leftists are apparently grotesquely ignorant about biology which is why we have ridiculous notions of men who menstruate and can bear children.

Good grief! What are you jabbering about now,? You are resorting to a straw man logical fallacy by invoking biology- and argument that I am not making ., The reason why a given couple same sex or opposite sex cannot have a child is not the issue You’re also muddying the waters with a red herring about men getting pregnant…. All to avoid the actual issue which is ……should gay / same sex relations be considered “unnatural “ because two people of the same gender cannot produce a child one on one and if so, does the same apply to hetero couples who cant have a child on their own . Deal with it. Yes or no Stop being such a coward and answer the question

 

[Hollie]

Good grief! What are you jabbering about now,? You are resorting to a straw man logical fallacy by invoking biology- and argument that I am not making ., The reason why a given couple same sex or opposite sex cannot have a child is not the issue You’re also muddying the waters with a red herring about men getting pregnant…. All to avoid the actual issue which is ……should gay / same sex relations be considered “unnatural “ because two people of the same gender cannot produce a child one on one and if so, does the same apply to hetero couples who cant have a child on their own . Deal with it. Yes or no Stop being such a coward and answer the question

Your attempt at argument is a total loser. It seems you don’t understand that procreation is a function of biology. Your cowardly retreat is expected, as you don’t understand your own babbling nonsense.

 

[ReinyDays]

In a related note ... Boise State has withdrawn from the NCAA Girls Volleyball Tournament ... rather than play against a grown man ...

This is how we protect our girls today? ... no wonder they want to be men ... and now "wife beating" is an Olympic sport ...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So why do lefties keep accusing Christians of being hateful when even biology says that it's wrong? It's not just the Bible that says two men or two women cannot make a baby but do they not believe in science either? If that's the case, then what do they go by with their claims that homosexuality is normal?

Biology also says a small cut on your foot should lead to a deadly infection.

Yawn

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

So why do lefties keep accusing Christians of being hateful when even biology says that it's wrong?

What about those who have non-left leaning politics who say this, why do you assume all those who make the claim are left wing oriented politically?

Biology does not "say" anything is "wrong" only people make declarations of things being right or wrong.

It's not just the Bible that says two men or two women cannot make a baby but do they not believe in science either? If that's the case, then what do they go by with their claims that homosexuality is normal?

Nowhere does the Bible state "two men or two women cannot make a baby" that statement is NOT in the Bible, just to be very clear.

As for homosexuality, well what is "normal" ? The Bible doesn't define "normal" either.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Your attempt at argument is a total loser. It seems you don’t understand that procreation is a function of biology. Your cowardly retreat is expected, as you don’t understand your own babbling nonsense.

Cut the bullshit with your straw man and red herring logical fallacies . I am not arguing biology and procreation which have noting to do with the validity of relationships. You're just using it as a distraction because you have no real argument to justify the stupidity of the OP