Billy the Bagman's duplicity has convinced Trump supporters, but will it convinced the judge?

[bripat9643]

TDS thread 1,516

Only criminal think pointing out justice department corruption is a bad thing.

Are you a criminal?

Exposing deep state crimes is not corruption, moron. It's justice.

They aren't exposing anything.

They are making shit up. It's a tried and true republican tactic. They lie about everything.

We "made up" that 6000 page DOJ report?

You filled it full of lies.

How did I do that when I didn't have anything to do with it?

Did you ever find any evidence that Nefertiti was black? We're all anxiously waiting.

 

[Crepitus]

How did I do that when I didn't have anything to do with it?

A sign of defeat. You can't respond intelligently so you pretend not to understand something that simple.

I'm done with you.

 

[Aldo Raine]

OP, just 4 1/2 more years. You’ll be ok.

What does a photoshopped picture have to do with the subject of the thread?

It’s ok man. You are going to vote for a senile rapist for President.

Ewe did!

 

[bripat9643]

How did I do that when I didn't have anything to do with it?

A sign of defeat. You can't respond intelligently so you pretend not to understand something that simple.

I'm done with you.

How do you respond intelligently to pure idiocy? Your belief that I had some kind of input to the report is the sign of a moron.

Did you ever find any evidence that Nefertiti was black? We're all anxiously waiting.

 

[lennypartiv]

Flynn acknowledged his guilt.

Prosecuting him is a waste of time. Trump would pardon him anyway.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Flynn acknowledged his guilt.

wrong, he acknowledged that he loved his son and that he was entrapped by rabid TDS bigots who were using him in coup against sitting president of USA.

They wanted to bring down Trump for treason, now they are reduced to trying to bring down Flynn for a trivial little lie, if that, so as not to come up with a complete 0 for all their efforts! TDS always makes fools of them and in this case makes them look like the ones committing treason.

 

[Lesh]

Flynn acknowledged his guilt.

Prosecuting him is a waste of time. Trump would pardon him anyway.

And he would be forever guilty.

Good. Do it.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

And he would be forever guilty.

guilty of what??????

 

[Lesh]

guilty of what??????

What crime did he plead guilty to?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

guilty of what??????

What crime did he plead guilty to?

yes what crime????/

 

[ColonelAngus]

Did ERIC Holder protect Obama?

Wasn’t he held in contempt of Congress?

Yes. He was.

Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress after historic vote

Attorney general first sitting cabinet member to be held in contempt as 17 Democrats join Republicans to pass resolution

www.theguardian.com

 

[Lesh]

guilty of what??????

What crime did he plead guilty to?

yes what crime????/

You DO know he plead guilty to SOMETHING right?

 

[berg80]

"It is now up to the district court to consider the government’s motion to dismiss the Flynn indictment. We urge Judge Sullivan to closely examine the Department’s stated rationale for dismissing the charges — including holding an evidentiary hearing with witnesses — and to deny the motion and proceed with sentencing if appropriate. While it is rare for a court to deny the Department’s request to dismiss an indictment, if ever there were a case where the public interest counseled the court to take a long, hard look at the government’s explanation and the evidence, it is this one. Attorney General Barr’s repeated actions to use the Department as a tool to further President Trump’s personal and political interests have undermined any claim to the deference that courts usually apply to the Department’s decisions about whether or not to prosecute a case."

DOJ Alumni Statement on Flynn Case

We, the undersigned, are alumni of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) who have collectively served both Republican and…

medium.com

 

[MACAULAY]

 

[The VOR]

TDS thread 1,516

TDS (Trump Defense Syndrome) post #20,872

 

[The VOR]

OP, just 4 1/2 more years. You’ll be ok.

That's not going to happen, anal one.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

"It is now up to the district court to consider the government’s motion to dismiss the Flynn indictment. We urge Judge Sullivan to closely examine the Department’s stated rationale for dismissing the charges — including holding an evidentiary hearing with witnesses — and to deny the motion and proceed with sentencing if appropriate. While it is rare for a court to deny the Department’s request to dismiss an indictment, if ever there were a case where the public interest counseled the court to take a long, hard look at the government’s explanation and the evidence, it is this one. Attorney General Barr’s repeated actions to use the Department as a tool to further President Trump’s personal and political interests have undermined any claim to the deference that courts usually apply to the Department’s decisions about whether or not to prosecute a case."

DOJ Alumni Statement on Flynn Case

We, the undersigned, are alumni of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) who have collectively served both Republican and…

medium.com

This case is over. If all your dreams came true and the judge refused to accept the motion to dismiss this case is still over. The prosecution will not prosecute. It's not like the judge can appoint another DOJ to take the case.

 

[Marion Morrison]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration’s bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.
The Department of Justice on Thursday told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington it wants to drop the case against Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, following a pressure campaign by the Republican president and his political allies.
While judges typically sign off on such motions, Sullivan could refuse and instead demand answers from the DOJ about who requested the sudden about-face, said Seth Waxman, a former federal prosecutor now at the law firm Dickinson Wright.
“If Judge Sullivan wanted to he could conduct an inquiry and start asking a lot of questions,” said Waxman.

Skeptical judge could hold up Trump administration's bid to clear Flynn, legal experts say

The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration's bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.

www.reuters.com

Presumably, Judge Sullivan is intimately familiar with these facts.

Flynn Redux: What Those FBI Documents Really Show

A lot of people seem to be expecting Michael Flynn's sudden vindication. They should take a deep breath.

www.lawfareblog.com

"The president may well pardon Flynn, as he has long hinted. It’s possible—though for reasons we’ll explain, we think unlikely—that Judge Emmet G. Sullivan will allow Flynn to withdraw his plea. And it’s possible as well that Attorney General William Barr, who has already intervened in the case once before and has asked a U.S. attorney to review its handling, will intervene once again on Flynn’s behalf. (how prescient was that!!)

So far, however, nothing has emerged that remotely clears Flynn; nothing has emerged that would require Sullivan to allow him to withdraw his plea; and nothing has emerged that would justify the Justice Department’s backing off of the case—or prosecuting it aggressively if Flynn were somehow allowed out of the very generous deal Special Counsel Robert Mueller cut him."
...................................................................................................................................................
Facts which expose Barr's attempt to get another Trump crony off the hook for a crime he committed much more difficult to pull off than it is to convince Trumpleheads. Folks who are eager and willing to swallow all the horseshit the Trump admin can shovel their way.

Cling to that life preserver if you wanna.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

TDS thread 1,516

Troll no. 2,903,355

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration’s bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.
The Department of Justice on Thursday told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington it wants to drop the case against Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, following a pressure campaign by the Republican president and his political allies.
While judges typically sign off on such motions, Sullivan could refuse and instead demand answers from the DOJ about who requested the sudden about-face, said Seth Waxman, a former federal prosecutor now at the law firm Dickinson Wright.
“If Judge Sullivan wanted to he could conduct an inquiry and start asking a lot of questions,” said Waxman.

Skeptical judge could hold up Trump administration's bid to clear Flynn, legal experts say

The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration's bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.

www.reuters.com

Presumably, Judge Sullivan is intimately familiar with these facts.

Flynn Redux: What Those FBI Documents Really Show

A lot of people seem to be expecting Michael Flynn's sudden vindication. They should take a deep breath.

www.lawfareblog.com

"The president may well pardon Flynn, as he has long hinted. It’s possible—though for reasons we’ll explain, we think unlikely—that Judge Emmet G. Sullivan will allow Flynn to withdraw his plea. And it’s possible as well that Attorney General William Barr, who has already intervened in the case once before and has asked a U.S. attorney to review its handling, will intervene once again on Flynn’s behalf. (how prescient was that!!)

So far, however, nothing has emerged that remotely clears Flynn; nothing has emerged that would require Sullivan to allow him to withdraw his plea; and nothing has emerged that would justify the Justice Department’s backing off of the case—or prosecuting it aggressively if Flynn were somehow allowed out of the very generous deal Special Counsel Robert Mueller cut him."
...................................................................................................................................................
Facts which expose Barr's attempt to get another Trump crony off the hook for a crime he committed much more difficult to pull off than it is to convince Trumpleheads. Folks who are eager and willing to swallow all the horseshit the Trump admin can shovel their way.

View attachment 333915

Your inability to refute the facts is noted.

View attachment 333916

Save those for November 3. You're going to need to buy about a dozen more boxes.