Billy the Bagman's duplicity has convinced Trump supporters, but will it convinced the judge?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

is the liberal afraid to tell us what it said???

Is the whiner afraid to go read it for himself?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

is the liberal afraid to tell us what it said???

Is the whiner afraid to go read it for himself?

is the liberal afraid to tell us what it said???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No, congress gave them military aid. Trump held up congress's military aid. Get it straight.

no Obama held it up and then gave them blankets while Trump gave them Javelins

 

[hadit]

Oh, no, Clinton did it.

Nope. Acquitted. Sorry.

Oh, then the judge was just making up all that stuff about fining him so much, the Bar taking his license, all that meant nothing (well, except for the handlers who had to pay his fines).

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh, then the judge was just making up all that stuff about fining him so much, the Bar taking his license, all that meant nothing

Lower bar than a conviction. All that matters is that he was acquitted. I learned that today.

 

[hadit]

Oh, then the judge was just making up all that stuff about fining him so much, the Bar taking his license, all that meant nothing

Lower bar than a conviction. All that matters is that he was acquitted. I learned that today.

When conviction/acquittal are the only choices, that's what matters. In Bubba's case, there was more.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When conviction/acquittal are the only choices, that's what matters. In Bubba's case, there was more

Well, bubba was a lawyer, trump is a conman. What are you going to do? Strip him of his charity license? Oops, wait, that already happened. I got nothing.

Furthermore, Trump wont even concede to an interview, much less a deposition. And we both know that is because he could not not lie. He bis not capable of not lying in that situation. This is not a secret. So you aren't really showing a good imbalance, here.

And personally, i think clinton should have resigned after lying to congress. That is a standard that should exist. Then we could have all scratched our heads and tackled the question of whether or not we want our special counsels asking about blowjobs in the oval office anyway. Instead, both that behavior and the acquittal set a new standard of "who gives a fuck anyway?"


Now presidents can do what they want, get impeached for it, and do a victory lap as a result. That's a national embarrassment and what dysfunctional government is at its core.

 

[hadit]

When conviction/acquittal are the only choices, that's what matters. In Bubba's case, there was more

Well, bubba was a lawyer, trump is a conman. What are you going to do? Strip him of his charity license? Oops, wait, that already happened. I got nothing.

Furthermore, Trump wont even concede to an interview, much less a deposition. And we both know that is because he could not not lie. He bis not capable of not lying in that situation. This is not a secret. So you aren't really showing a good imbalance, here.

And personally, i think clinton should have resigned after lying to congress. That is a standard that should exist. Then we could have all scratched our heads and tackled the question of whether or not we want our special counsels asking about blowjobs in the oval office anyway. Instead, both that behavior and the acquittal set a new standard of "who gives a fuck anyway?"


Now presidents can do what they want, get impeached for it, and do a victory lap as a result. That's a national embarrassment and what dysfunctional government is at its core.

And will be even worse if they go after Trump again, after failing so spectacularly.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And will be even worse if they go after Trump again, after failing so spectacularly.

That, of course, would depend on what they went after him for.

 

[hadit]

And will be even worse if they go after Trump again, after failing so spectacularly.

That, of course, would depend on what they went after him for.

What else? "Russia, Russia, Russia". They're obsessed with it. If they do try, it had better be ironclad and really bad, because otherwise they've completely destroyed any value impeachment has.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Hardly

Yes, to imply trump rarely lies is embarrassing cultism, and you are embarrassing yourself. I cant believe the grip that freak has on people's brains

Find me a politician that "rarely" lies. You don't get to Washington on the truth. I mean, Bubba made an art form out of it.

No shit. Dude actually made himself believe it.

He could stand up in front of an audience, look them all in the eyes for a moment before saying "I.......am not......here." (elvis/elmerfudd voice). And everybody would be like..."where did he go?"

.

 

[colfax_m]

But that’s not what their motion to dismiss said.

is the liberal afraid to tell us what it said???

I’ve been saying it as nuseum. They said they’d be unable to prove the case.

 

[bripat9643]

Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."

It's not the first time Nunes lied.

How convenient. Simply swear up and down that anyone presenting inconvenient information is lying. How very gauche and extremely partisan.

Nunes can make whatever claims he wants on TV. Until he shows the evidence, he’s not going to he taken seriously.

you want to Nunes to show evidence that a 302 report is missing for first time in FBI history??

Donald Trump demands copy of FBI Mike Flynn interview notes
internewscast.com › donald-trump-demands-copy-of-fb...

5 days ago - Devin Nunes told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo the 302, which consists of notes ... Trump tweeted about FBI documents he said were missing.

The notes from Flynn’s interview were made public at least 6 months ago. Y’all really don’t read.

The 302 been available for probably a year.

You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.

 

[berg80]

No, congress gave them military aid. Trump held up congress's military aid. Get it straight.

no Obama held it up and then gave them blankets while Trump gave them Javelins

Gaetz misleads about Obama's record on Ukraine military aid

U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., has become one of President Donald Trump’s key attack dogs as he pushes back against the D

www.politifact.com

 

[berg80]

You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.

Liar.

Judge Sullivan Has Already Rejected Most of Timothy Shea's DOJ Flynn Pardon - emptywheel

In this post, I laid out how Acting DC US Attorney Timothy Shea claimed DOJ had “newly” acquired a bunch of information which led it to decide to ask Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss Mike Flynn’s prosecution. Except none of the information was new. The table below shows what is known about the...

www.emptywheel.net

 

[hadit]

Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."

It's not the first time Nunes lied.

How convenient. Simply swear up and down that anyone presenting inconvenient information is lying. How very gauche and extremely partisan.

Nunes can make whatever claims he wants on TV. Until he shows the evidence, he’s not going to he taken seriously.

you want to Nunes to show evidence that a 302 report is missing for first time in FBI history??

Donald Trump demands copy of FBI Mike Flynn interview notes
internewscast.com › donald-trump-demands-copy-of-fb...

5 days ago - Devin Nunes told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo the 302, which consists of notes ... Trump tweeted about FBI documents he said were missing.

The notes from Flynn’s interview were made public at least 6 months ago. Y’all really don’t read.

The 302 been available for probably a year.

You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.

It is not a light thing when the prosecution loses original evidence. Not a light thing at all.

 

[berg80]

Here's an interesting question. Since Judge Sullivan has already ruled on much of the bogus bullshit Billy the Bagman pulled out of his fat ass............

December, he described an in camera review he did in December 2018, in part to make sure the summaries of the Mary McCord and Sally Yates 302s was adequate disclosure.

As to Requests a through f and Request i, the government has provided Mr. Flynn with: (a) “information from interviews with [Mr.] McCabe that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing”; (b) “information that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing about such pre-interview discussions, including the language quoted in the request”; (c) “information about such post-interview debriefings that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing”; (d) “information from former [Principal] Associate Deputy Attorney General Matthew Axelrod’s interview report that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing”; (e) “information from [Ms.] McCord’s interview report that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing, including the information quoted in the request”; (f) “information from [Ms.] Yates’ interview report that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material to sentencing, including the information quoted in the request”;
[snip]
Based on an in camera review of the government’s sealed submissions to the Court on December 14, 2018, see, e.g., Min. Order of Dec. 17, 2018; Gov’t’s Opp’n, ECF No. 122 at 16 n.8; Gov’t’s Notice of Disc. Correspondence, ECF No. 123 at 3, the Court agrees with the government that the requested information in Requests a through f and Request i has already been provided to Mr. Flynn in the form of appropriate summaries, see Gov’t’s App. A, ECF No. 122-1 at 6-7.

GIVEN THAT SULLIVAN ACCOUNTED FOR THESE DOCUMENTS, HIS MATERIALITY ANALYSIS IS UNLIKELY TO CHANGE
As noted, Sullivan might decide that some of these documents should have been provided under Brady, in spite of his ruling on them. But unless he does, it’s unlikely his view on the materiality of Flynn’s lies will change, contrary to the footnote in Shea’s memo yesterday.

7 The Government appreciates that the Court previously deemed Mr. Flynn’s statements sufficiently “material” to the investigation. United States v. Flynn, 411 F. Supp. 3d 15, 41-42 (D.D.C. 2019). It did so, however, based on the Government’s prior understanding of the nature of the investigation, before new disclosures crystallized the lack of a legitimate investigative basis for the interview of Mr. Flynn, and in the context of a decision on multiple defense Brady motions independent of the Government’s assessment of its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

.........................why would he pretend his whiny little bitch complaint justifies the DOJ dropping the charges against the confessed criminal Flynn?


For the consumption of Trumpleheads of course. Barr knows all he has to do is throw a bunch of manure on the wall and RWM will do the rest by misinforming the knuckle dragging rubes who drool at the mention of the Adulterer-in-Chief's name.

 

[colfax_m]

Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."

It's not the first time Nunes lied.

How convenient. Simply swear up and down that anyone presenting inconvenient information is lying. How very gauche and extremely partisan.

Nunes can make whatever claims he wants on TV. Until he shows the evidence, he’s not going to he taken seriously.

you want to Nunes to show evidence that a 302 report is missing for first time in FBI history??

Donald Trump demands copy of FBI Mike Flynn interview notes
internewscast.com › donald-trump-demands-copy-of-fb...

5 days ago - Devin Nunes told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo the 302, which consists of notes ... Trump tweeted about FBI documents he said were missing.

The notes from Flynn’s interview were made public at least 6 months ago. Y’all really don’t read.

The 302 been available for probably a year.

You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.

It is not a light thing when the prosecution loses original evidence. Not a light thing at all.

Which didn’t happen.

 

[bripat9643]

No, congress gave them military aid. Trump held up congress's military aid. Get it straight.

no Obama held it up and then gave them blankets while Trump gave them Javelins

Gaetz misleads about Obama's record on Ukraine military aid

U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., has become one of President Donald Trump’s key attack dogs as he pushes back against the D

www.politifact.com

"But the United States under Obama did provide extensive military and security aid but not lethal weapons. "

In other words, pretty much what Gaetz said.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.

Liar.

Judge Sullivan Has Already Rejected Most of Timothy Shea's DOJ Flynn Pardon - emptywheel

In this post, I laid out how Acting DC US Attorney Timothy Shea claimed DOJ had “newly” acquired a bunch of information which led it to decide to ask Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss Mike Flynn’s prosecution. Except none of the information was new. The table below shows what is known about the...

www.emptywheel.net

Flak designed to obscure the truth.