Facts are facts, these bills would have helped create more jobs, they were introduced by republicans, they were blocked by democrats. Did you want to talk about it or do you want to go off topic by trying to distract from these facts with your questions?
Some on here are saying they would have destroyed the environment, maybe pick one of the bills you agree with others on and we can discuss it...you know the details...maybe we can even compare the potential environmental damage to the potential job creation. Or maybe you will try and prop up a straw man to argue against instead.
I'll do what I please - and what I choose to do is attack the motive of the thread itself. It's called "partisan hackery." It's blatant, it's stupid, and it sure as shit isn't well researched -
Translation: "Damn it pilgrim isn't being all partisan about it and is just posting the facts, how can I argue something where the facts don't back me up if the idiot who made the thread won't fall for my strategies to make partisans fall into arguing things that don't relate to the topic"
It's automatically partisan that you posted bills blocked by one side, and not bills blocked by the other - so-in order to give an incomplete picture, dipshit.