Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[danielpalos]

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.

No you are wrong.

Claiming that there is a natural rate of unemployment is a fallacy and no argument need be made against a fallacy

you have nothing but an appeal to ignorance. i can find glossary definitions of the economic term.

The term is based on ignorance

Definitions mean nothing since every false concept can be explained with words which have definitions


Your claims are still a Fallacy and rooted in ignorance

why should i believe You?

 

[danielpalos]

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

 

[Soupnazi630]

That's not what's going on.

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No, the market sets the value of work. When the government does it, disaster follows.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. right wing propaganda and rhetoric is all they have.

we use fiat money.

Everyone takes the right wing more serious about economics than they do you and Sanders

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.

No you are wrong.

Claiming that there is a natural rate of unemployment is a fallacy and no argument need be made against a fallacy

you have nothing but an appeal to ignorance. i can find glossary definitions of the economic term.

The term is based on ignorance

Definitions mean nothing since every false concept can be explained with words which have definitions


Your claims are still a Fallacy and rooted in ignorance

why should i believe You?

You already do but deny it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No, the market sets the value of work. When the government does it, disaster follows.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. right wing propaganda and rhetoric is all they have.

we use fiat money.

Everyone takes the right wing more serious about economics than they do you and Sanders

the left is learning how use Capitalism for all of its capital worth in modern capital times.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

 

[danielpalos]

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

 

[danielpalos]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

 

[Soupnazi630]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

Which always fails.

 

[danielpalos]

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

you appeal to ignorance of valid economic arguments but want to be taken seriously. only bigots do that. you have to justify your currently unsubstantiated opinion with a valid argument; i can't merely take your word for it.

 

[danielpalos]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

Which always fails.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government

 

[Soupnazi630]

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

you appeal to ignorance of valid economic arguments but want to be taken seriously. only bigots do that. you have to justify your currently unsubstantiated opinion with a valid argument; i can't merely take your word for it.

You are not making valid economic arguments but simple fallacies such as natural unemployment rate which no economist buys.

Rejecting such arguments as your is not bigotry and your accusation of bigotry is a false label which indicates you have no intelligent argument

No you have to validate your claims which you have never done.

An argument with no evidence can intelligently be dismissed with no evidence and your arguments have no supporting evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

Which always fails.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government

Which is not socialism

 

[danielpalos]

i can find definitions on the internet. why do You appeal to ignorance?

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

you appeal to ignorance of valid economic arguments but want to be taken seriously. only bigots do that. you have to justify your currently unsubstantiated opinion with a valid argument; i can't merely take your word for it.

You are not making valid economic arguments but simple fallacies such as natural unemployment rate which no economist buys.

Rejecting such arguments as your is not bigotry and your accusation of bigotry is a false label which indicates you have no intelligent argument

No you have to validate your claims which you have never done.

An argument with no evidence can intelligently be dismissed with no evidence and your arguments have no supporting evidence

which economists don't believe in the concept of a natural rate of unemployment?

 

[danielpalos]

yes; the dole was socialism.

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

Which always fails.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government

Which is not socialism

Government is socialism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

So can I .

I can find definitions for sasquatch and the loch Ness monster which does not make them true.

Your claim is the one rooted in ignorance.

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

you appeal to ignorance of valid economic arguments but want to be taken seriously. only bigots do that. you have to justify your currently unsubstantiated opinion with a valid argument; i can't merely take your word for it.

You are not making valid economic arguments but simple fallacies such as natural unemployment rate which no economist buys.

Rejecting such arguments as your is not bigotry and your accusation of bigotry is a false label which indicates you have no intelligent argument

No you have to validate your claims which you have never done.

An argument with no evidence can intelligently be dismissed with no evidence and your arguments have no supporting evidence

which economists don't believe in the concept of a natural rate of unemployment?

All of the intelligent ones.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No! Giving out free bread to the peasants is NOT socialism. You go on ad nauseum about this stuff yet know nothing about the subject. It's no more socialism than me handing a parking lot beggar a couple of bucks is.
Wake up.

A State function and means of production.

Which always fails.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government

Which is not socialism

Government is socialism.

No it is not.

Socialism is a type of government not any government

 

[danielpalos]

i prefer economic arguments to fallacy with nothing but bigotry for support.

You have made no economic arguments but only fallacy and false accusations of bigotry

you appeal to ignorance of valid economic arguments but want to be taken seriously. only bigots do that. you have to justify your currently unsubstantiated opinion with a valid argument; i can't merely take your word for it.

You are not making valid economic arguments but simple fallacies such as natural unemployment rate which no economist buys.

Rejecting such arguments as your is not bigotry and your accusation of bigotry is a false label which indicates you have no intelligent argument

No you have to validate your claims which you have never done.

An argument with no evidence can intelligently be dismissed with no evidence and your arguments have no supporting evidence

which economists don't believe in the concept of a natural rate of unemployment?

All of the intelligent ones.

only the economically clueless and economically Causeless, say that.