Bill Clinton in Hot Tub with Mystery Woman / Epstein files

Per AI:
Virtually all scholars and historians of antiquity agree that Jesus of Nazareth was a real historical person who lived in first-century Palestine. While details of his life are debated, his existence is not doubted by mainstream historians, regardless of their religious or non-religious, including atheist or agnostic, backgrounds.

You're welcome.
Not on behalf on the NT accounts - miracles, God's son, etc.

There is just agreement (no proof) that a jobless Jewish Hippy, (aka a lefty/Lib) camped around a lake, and preached against the practices of Jews and their Temple-Cult.

You're welcome.
 
Not on behalf on the NT accounts - miracles, God's son, etc.

There is just agreement (no proof) that a jobless Jewish Hippy, (aka a lefty/Lib) camped around a lake, and preached against the practices of Jews and their Temple-Cult.

You're welcome.
I believe you just moved the goal posts. Went from "he didn't exist" to "Well, He wasn't divine".
 
I believe you just moved the goal posts. Went from "he didn't exist" to "Well, He wasn't divine".
Not just that:

AI:
there are no surviving, firsthand, "official" Roman court records (like trial transcripts) from the time of Jesus

What happened, was that later Roman writers/historians - around 100 B.C. simply took over stories, taking them personally for real (without proof) propagated by Jews, who later organized in larger groups, and became at around 200 B.C. what is termed Christians.
 
Not just that:

AI:
there are no surviving, firsthand, "official" Roman court records (like trial transcripts) from the time of Jesus

What happened, was that later Roman writers/historians - around 100 B.C. simply took over stories, taking them personally for real (without proof) propagated by Jews, who later organized in larger groups, and became at around 200 B.C. what is termed Christians.
There are indeed Roman accounts of Jesus. Every ancient account means taking someone at his word by definition. Talking about first hand is silly.
 
There are indeed Roman accounts of Jesus.
No there are not - no first hand accounts, nor by anyone else - see AI. aka no proof.

E.g. the Pilates letters send to Tiberius (Jesus trial) are written by another person - so no first hand account!!!
but factually a forgery.
Every ancient account means taking someone at his word by definition. Talking about first hand is silly.
And factual history is NOT based on a single word/story source and "sold" as a "historic account" - but several independent sources based onto several stories, and material/archeological proof, e.g. Egyptian papyrus texts, that are found as well on a granite Steele or sarcophagus - become "proof" towards a factual historic account.

That is why the words of the "Jewish" bible have no historic relevance - since no other historical accounts from e.g the Egyptians, Hittites, Philistines, Assyrians, etc. ever mentioned a state of Israel, nor a King David nor a King Solomon presiding over a State called Israel - even the rulers names and buildings are in dispute.

Only the OT, written/composed entirely by Jews/Hebrews, and constantly "amended" through centuries mentions/claims all this.

Tacitus records that the Roman populace during Nero, called "them" Chrestiani, a term associated with a "mischievous superstition" or "deadly superstition" - it is this Latin description term that around 200 B.C. led to the term Christian. However Chrestiani has nothing to do with "Christ" thus becoming Christian. But simply an invention by the later Roman Catholic Church.

But anyway - wrong thread - and wouldn't make sense to discuss such a topic with a "believer".
 
Trump bragged that he did just that.
If he's not a threat like Virginia Gufrie said, then what's the problem ?? Is it just something you idiots think about, so you figure it will make Trump appear as if he is doing something wrong when instead it is your brain's doing something wrong ???
 
If he's not a threat like Virginia Gufrie said, then what's the problem ?? Is it just something you idiots think about, so you figure it will make Trump appear as if he is doing something wrong when instead it is your brain's doing something wrong ???

Im condemning what Trump said he did. Odd all of a sudden you have no issue with men in women's dressing room.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom