For christ's sake. Do you remember posting that you expected to get crickets from me? It was a fucking joke you idiot.
It's hard to believe you're this stupid. The values in that table in post #489 are the values of CO2 produced per kWh over the manufacture, installation and operatonal lifetime of those wind turbines. Almost every single gram of that is produced during the turbine's manufacture and installation. Virtually NONE is produced while it is operating.
Now I'm presuming that you actually DO know the difference between a Watt and a Watt-Hour and that your earlier mistake was just a typo of sorts. So since that table provides us CO2 per kWh, rather than looking at how many coal plants are being built versus how many wind turbine are being built, we can look either at the installed capacity or the actual power consumption. We can determine, for instance, how much CO2 would be produced supplying the world's current demand solely with fossil fuels and, alternatively, solely with wind turbines. And when we do that, we will find that in the absolute best case (for you), a world powered solely by natural gas would produce more than 17 times as much CO2 as a world powered entirely by the wind turbines with the worst carbon footprint around.
DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING?