Big Win For Lake

[Harpy Eagle]

Do your own legwork you Buffon. Its been posted all over since 2020. I'm not your weekend lackey. See GA PA MI Wi for starters you dumb APE.

Ok...

The state of GA had an increase over all of 22% in the number of votes cast between 2016 and 2020.

Here are the 20 counties with the largest percent of growth between 2016 and 2020. The party they went to is listed next to them.

Only 3 counites that went Dem had a larger increase than the state average.

Seems you were lied to yet again and are too stupid to do that math yourself.

 

[leftwinger]

Ok...

The state of GA had an increase over all of 22% in the number of votes cast between 2016 and 2020.

Here are the 20 counties with the largest percent of growth between 2016 and 2020. The party they went to is listed next to them.

Only 3 counites that went Dem had a larger increase than the state average.

Seems you were lied to yet again and are too stupid to do that math yourself.

View attachment 780792

You dumb OX. It was 4 big spikes after midnight NOV03 (during shutdown, DEM using Chocolate cities) that swung the Election Trump was winning easily. That was the point. Not population growth or aggregate vote totals!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You dumb OX. It was 4 big spikes after midnight NOV03 (during shutdown, DEM using Chocolate cities) that swung the Election Trump was winning easily. That was the point. Not population growth or aggregate vote totals!

That is not what you said. Now you are changing your story since you were proven a liar.

Oh, and here is the same data for PA, showing you are a liar once again.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

You dumb OX. It was 4 big spikes after midnight NOV03 (during shutdown, DEM using Chocolate cities) that swung the Election Trump was winning easily. That was the point. Not population growth or aggregate vote totals!

Uh spikes..like in..they counted the ballots for while..released the tally..and did so four times? From large districts with a heavy Biden vote?
Why is that 'Suspicious'?
From where I sit..the 'spikes' appear totally organic to the process and unremarkable.

 

[leftwinger]

Uh spikes..like in..they counted the ballots for while..released the tally..and did so four times? From large districts with a heavy Biden vote?
Why is that 'Suspicious'?
From where I sit..the 'spikes' appear totally organic to the process and unremarkable.

If you read or watched anything but MSNBC you would know. No other large predominantly D counties suddenly had huge D vote spikes after midnight *supposedly during shutdown. Not in CA CONN etc. Only ATL DET MIL or PHI. Libstain see nothing to see there.

These spikes overcame Trumps massive lead in all four swing states.

Get off me you mushed brain buffoons.

 

[Faun]

You dumb OX. It was 4 big spikes after midnight NOV03 (during shutdown, DEM using Chocolate cities) that swung the Election Trump was winning easily. That was the point. Not population growth or aggregate vote totals!

What shutdown?

 

[leftwinger]

Just once, one poster. It would be nice to see just one say "this does look fishy. We should audit envelope signatures. Investigate Ballots for proper folds" anything. Just one shred of intelligence, honesty, dignity, integrity, moral compass. Why can't the count, the ballot submission, machines, onlie or not? be verified in GA? PA? MI? 2020? 2022? Etc. They are not capable of honest thinking.

Disgusting to know people like those posting on this site live in this country. Eventually they will have to be dealt with. It may be in camps or street war after full collapse or seizure.

 

[leftwinger]

What shutdown?

Get off me you WORTHLESS sack of BS.

 

[Faun]

Get off me you WORTHLESS sack of BS.

LOLOL

No worries, ChoadBreath, I already knew there was no shutdown. I just wanted you to admit it like ya did.

 

[para bellum]

Here are the 20 counties with the largest percent of growth between 2016 and 2020. The party they went to is listed next to them.

Just looking at the rate doesn't tell the whole story in numbers. The high population counties decide the elections, not the small rural ones.

I can show you something that looks odd in GA, using a Gov't dataset. Do you know HAVV? It's a database run by the social security administration that is part of the Help America Vote Act.

The database is connected to State DMV computers. When a new voter can't be verified through the DMV, the voter identity is checked against the Social Security database.

A "no match" means a voter registration was entered, but the voter did not have either a Georgia driver license, or a social security number.

This dataset is completely out of reach of state actors.

Download the full .xlsx dataset. Look at Georgia in the last two weeks of July 2019. The tabs are 072019 and 072719.

(edit to add: no need to d/l the entire database, you can just pick the weeks ending in the dates above and use the html view)

Those two weeks have a huge jump in HAVV checks and almost all of them are "no matches". Look at the weeks surrounding those two weeks. You can't explain that as a normal demographic change- it's the work of some organization- like an NGO.

What happened to all those voter registrations that could not be verified? Were they discarded? I have never heard the question even asked.

SSA Open Data | HAVV Transactions by State

SSA HAVV Transactions by State

www.ssa.gov

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What happened to all those voter registrations that could not be verified? Were they discarded? I have never heard the question even asked.

Interesting, and a good question as to what happens to a non-match

 

[leftwinger]

Counting the number of ballots recorded on the Runbeck created “MC Inbound—Receipt of Delivery” forms for early ballots delivered to Runbeck on and after Election Day documents only263,379 early ballots received by Runbeck. Hobbs.Appx:123- In comparison, the “MC Incoming Scan Receipts” Hobbs (Hobbs.App:132-61) cites in her brief, documentsthe total number of early ballots scanned for signature verification at Runbeck as 298,942, the same figure reported by the Runbeck whistleblower noted in Lake’s opening brief at 18. In other words, the very “MC Inbound Receipt of Delivery” forms that Hobbs points to as chain of custody, fail to document any record of delivery or receipt of the other 35,563 ballots scanned at Runbeck, an inexplicable discrepancy that far exceeds the margin between Hobbs and Lake.

******
This is why Runbeck and Maricopa County refused to provide video footage from their loading docks and warehouse after election day.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, We The People AZ Alliance will be filing a lawsuit after Maricopa County and Runbeck Election Services denied lawful public records requests for footage at their facility, which could prove that 35,563 illegal ballots were added to the count. Runbeck’s liberal attorney is also the same attorney who represented Katie Hobbs in Lake’s lawsuit.

 

[leftwinger]

Uh spikes..like in..they counted the ballots for while..released the tally..and did so four times? From large districts with a heavy Biden vote?
Why is that 'Suspicious'?
From where I sit..the 'spikes' appear totally organic to the process and unremarkable.

Question: Why did CA or CT or other heavy "Biden" districts show any late night VOTE tally Spikes?

 

[leftwinger]

Today was finally a LAKE hearing in Court. Shocker, MCBOS did not follow procedures for Tabulators and or Ballot printers.//
A Big finding from plaintiff (LAKE).The Law states Tabulators were supposed to be Certified/Sealed by a ~OCT11, 2022 (~60%).

Plaintiff has evidence that MCBOS conducted secret testing (after certification) of those tabulators on OCT 14,17,18. 260 of 436Tabulators FAILED secret testing "LA" (Logic and Accuracy test) but were still put into use on Election day? This was characterized as MISCONDUCT by plaintiff. Defense is trying to get it stricken from the record. But this was not an Evidentiary hearing. Only now discovered since the rush Court event in DEC?

They said they have Signature WhistleBlowers and Cyber experts (who discovered the secret testing) that will be brought into this upcoming trial.

No wonder Bill Gates has developed PTDS from Election Deniers. Did this damage Early Voting also?
see minute 19:38 of the trial footage video on GP.

note: Judge appears to be a deep state loon who wants nothing but to hurry all this up after sitting on this since DEC 2022.

 

[leftwinger]

Impartial bill gates mcbos runs...

 

[leftwinger]

 

[leftwinger]

MADDENING. 1/2 a year after 2022 Signature Fraud & Printer Fraud and not one person has been allowed to review the ENVELOPE singings. Dirty Judge tossed out intentional MCBOS machine tampering (AFTER CERTIFICATION) which is a violation of law.

 

[L.K.Eder]

that's a shame. karen lake should demand to speak to the manager, again.

 

[Faun]

MADDENING. 1/2 a year after 2022 Signature Fraud & Printer Fraud and not one person has been allowed to review the ENVELOPE singings. Dirty Judge tossed out intentional MCBOS machine tampering (AFTER CERTIFICATION) which is a violation of law.

How awful.

 

[Lastamender]

How awful.

How true.