Biden to cut some infrastructure by 96%

Flash

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2014
71,172
62,028
3,645
Florida
Looks like our ole pal doesn't really believe in infrastructure, does he?

Why would anybody be so dumb as to cut border security at a time when thousands of Illegals are flooding across the border every day?

Dat boy ain't quite right in the head, is he?


Biden Wants to Cut Funding for ‘Border Security Assets and Infrastructure’ by 96%


Terence Jeffrey / @TerryJeffrey / August 04, 2021

President Joe Biden has now revealed there is at least one area in which he is a fiscal conservative: When it comes to providing the infrastructure needed to secure the border, he wants to spend far less than the government currently spends.


His administration has presented Congress with a Department of Homeland Security budget proposal that calls for slashing spending on what it calls “Border Security Assets and Infrastructure” by 96%.


In fiscal year 2021, Congress approved $1,513,000,000 in funding for border security assets and infrastructure. Biden is now asking that Congress approve just $54,315,000 for fiscal year 2022. That is a reduction of $1,458,685,000—or 96.4%.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
It will soon be time for all good Americans to take up arms and do what the Biden regime refuses to do: protect this country...


But then we would be consider Right Wing terrorists and Dufus would feel justified in killing us with nuclear weapons and F-16s. He said so.
 
Looks like our ole pal doesn't really believe in infrastructure, does he?

Why would anybody be so dumb as to cut border security at a time when thousands of Illegals are flooding across the border every day?

Dat boy ain't quite right in the head, is he?


Biden Wants to Cut Funding for ‘Border Security Assets and Infrastructure’ by 96%


Terence Jeffrey / @TerryJeffrey / August 04, 2021

President Joe Biden has now revealed there is at least one area in which he is a fiscal conservative: When it comes to providing the infrastructure needed to secure the border, he wants to spend far less than the government currently spends.


His administration has presented Congress with a Department of Homeland Security budget proposal that calls for slashing spending on what it calls “Border Security Assets and Infrastructure” by 96%.


In fiscal year 2021, Congress approved $1,513,000,000 in funding for border security assets and infrastructure. Biden is now asking that Congress approve just $54,315,000 for fiscal year 2022. That is a reduction of $1,458,685,000—or 96.4%.
I read the article and I simply do not think a permanent wall is worth $1.5 Billion Dollars a year. That would be enough to fund 3,782 personnel at $40,000/year. At least that would be a broad based boon to employment and a wider spread to the application of the cash, than into the pockets of the selected construction contractors and would not support a throwing that money at a 1500-mile wall and I can scale (even at my age) crossing the wide variety of terrains, (desert, mountainous, river and stream posing different engineering and logistic challenges) nor the use of eminent domain to acquire the land from the landowners. Furthermore, the wall so far has been built so far, is on relatively even terrain, close to roads, so the price will only go up, without solving the problem. I am just not a "build the wall" kind of guy.
 
Looks like our ole pal doesn't really believe in infrastructure, does he?

Why would anybody be so dumb as to cut border security at a time when thousands of Illegals are flooding across the border every day?

Dat boy ain't quite right in the head, is he?


Biden Wants to Cut Funding for ‘Border Security Assets and Infrastructure’ by 96%


Terence Jeffrey / @TerryJeffrey / August 04, 2021

President Joe Biden has now revealed there is at least one area in which he is a fiscal conservative: When it comes to providing the infrastructure needed to secure the border, he wants to spend far less than the government currently spends.


His administration has presented Congress with a Department of Homeland Security budget proposal that calls for slashing spending on what it calls “Border Security Assets and Infrastructure” by 96%.


In fiscal year 2021, Congress approved $1,513,000,000 in funding for border security assets and infrastructure. Biden is now asking that Congress approve just $54,315,000 for fiscal year 2022. That is a reduction of $1,458,685,000—or 96.4%.
They already gave then several billion in addition to their budget.
 
I read the article and I simply do not think a permanent wall is worth $1.5 Billion Dollars a year. That would be enough to fund 3,782 personnel at $40,000/year. At least that would be a broad based boon to employment and a wider spread to the application of the cash, than into the pockets of the selected construction contractors and would not support a throwing that money at a 1500-mile wall and I can scale (even at my age) crossing the wide variety of terrains, (desert, mountainous, river and stream posing different engineering and logistic challenges) nor the use of eminent domain to acquire the land from the landowners. Furthermore, the wall so far has been built so far, is on relatively even terrain, close to roads, so the price will only go up, without solving the problem. I am just not a "build the wall" kind of guy.
the wall has more than proven it slows and stops in some cases entry, and considering the amount of money it costs a yr for illegals to be here the wall is much cheaper,,

as for employment,, well there are last I heard 81 million open jobs not filled,, also the government doesnt create jobs, so jobs are a non issue,,
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
I read the article and I simply do not think a permanent wall is worth $1.5 Billion Dollars a year. That would be enough to fund 3,782 personnel at $40,000/year. At least that would be a broad based boon to employment and a wider spread to the application of the cash, than into the pockets of the selected construction contractors and would not support a throwing that money at a 1500-mile wall and I can scale (even at my age) crossing the wide variety of terrains, (desert, mountainous, river and stream posing different engineering and logistic challenges) nor the use of eminent domain to acquire the land from the landowners. Furthermore, the wall so far has been built so far, is on relatively even terrain, close to roads, so the price will only go up, without solving the problem. I am just not a "build the wall" kind of guy.


Maybe we wouldn't need the wall so much if Joe Dufus hadn't cancelled the agreement that Trump had with Mexico.

Dufus did a double whammy. Cancelled the security agreement with Mexico and stopped doing border security.

Keeping the goddamn Illegals out saves welfare money because all the shitheads signs up for welfare and then flood our schools with the beaner kids. T

Then you have the enormous crime committed by the bastards.

The wall is a good investment. Joe Dufus is an idiot. Anybody that voted for him is an idiot. Anybody that ignored the fact he stole the election is an idiot. This policy is a great example of his stupidity.
 
I read the article and I simply do not think a permanent wall is worth $1.5 Billion Dollars a year. That would be enough to fund 3,782 personnel at $40,000/year. At least that would be a broad based boon to employment and a wider spread to the application of the cash, than into the pockets of the selected construction contractors and would not support a throwing that money at a 1500-mile wall and I can scale (even at my age) crossing the wide variety of terrains, (desert, mountainous, river and stream posing different engineering and logistic challenges) nor the use of eminent domain to acquire the land from the landowners. Furthermore, the wall so far has been built so far, is on relatively even terrain, close to roads, so the price will only go up, without solving the problem. I am just not a "build the wall" kind of guy.
i've never been a wall person and believe we can use technology to stop and / or contain this to levels we can manage with updated process and policy.

the problem is simply congress doesn't want to fix it. anything else is a band aid by another group trying to do SOMETHING to address what the one branch who SHOULD be fixing this isn't doing.

lets look at our current immigration problem and what do we do about it? what policy do we want? obviously biden wants open border by his policies despite what his fanboys cry out about WE DON'T HAVE AN OPEN BORDER POLICY!

policy? no. reality? hell yes. your man is lying.

reagan granted amnesty if the dems would finally come to a solid policy. he gave it, they didn't. how do you trust working with a group that will tell you one thing while doing another.

ie - NO OPEN BORDERS (come on thru guys, we got you, bus to minnesota over there)

the wall is a reaction, not a solution. the solution is congress but we're a total political enema away from getting anything accomplished in congress anymore.
 
If the GOP had any balls they shoulda made constructing the Wall a requirement for any democrat spending beyond real infrastructure like roads and bridges. AND increased the Border Patrol funding so that the Wall could be more secure and more facilities built to house the immigrants. That Wall isn't going to stop all illegal entries, but it does slow it down and redirect much of it to the border checkpoints where incoming people can be tested for COVID. That would've been the most humane way to deal with the problem, but no, the democrats had to oppose anything that Trump did or wanted to do.
 
They already gave then several billion in addition to their budget.
oh just stop being a total contraire asswhipe.

he's pushing for record spending on infrastructure then saying he wants to cut back 96% of the budget. another record as it sits.

it's total and complete bullshit and anyone trying to defend it obviously doesn't give a dead rats ass in a banana hurricane about the truth.
 
Maybe we wouldn't need the wall so much if Joe Dufus hadn't cancelled the agreement that Trump had with Mexico.

Dufus did a double whammy. Cancelled the security agreement with Mexico and stopped doing border security.

Keeping the goddamn Illegals out saves welfare money because all the shitheads signs up for welfare and then flood our schools with the beaner kids. T

Then you have the enormous crime committed by the bastards.

The wall is a good investment. Joe Dufus is an idiot. Anybody that voted for him is an idiot. Anybody that ignored the fact he stole the election is an idiot. This policy is a great example of his stupidity.
Still not a good investment. True, the agreement to keep them over there until processed for asylum should have been kept. It is the one move, that signalled come one, come all. I don't know if it was Joe's idea, but he signed off on it. Really the border handling is my one major complaint, but it is significant to me.
 
i've never been a wall person and believe we can use technology to stop and / or contain this to levels we can manage with updated process and policy.

the problem is simply congress doesn't want to fix it. anything else is a band aid by another group trying to do SOMETHING to address what the one branch who SHOULD be fixing this isn't doing.

lets look at our current immigration problem and what do we do about it? what policy do we want? obviously biden wants open border by his policies despite what his fanboys cry out about WE DON'T HAVE AN OPEN BORDER POLICY!

policy? no. reality? hell yes. your man is lying.

reagan granted amnesty if the dems would finally come to a solid policy. he gave it, they didn't. how do you trust working with a group that will tell you one thing while doing another.

ie - NO OPEN BORDERS (come on thru guys, we got you, bus to minnesota over there)

the wall is a reaction, not a solution. the solution is congress but we're a total political enema away from getting anything accomplished in congress anymore.
I don't think either side wants to solve the problem.
I agree, technnolgy and monitoring and available manpower to pick up and dump back across the border, anybody detected illegally sneaking into the country. No hearing, no court date, no excuse or applying for amnesty of asylum after illegal border cross and banned from consideration if applying later, after being kicked out.
 
I don't think either side wants to solve the problem.
I agree, technnolgy and monitoring and available manpower to pick up and dump back across the border, anybody detected illegally sneaking into the country. No hearing, no court date, no excuse or applying for amnesty of asylum after illegal border cross and banned from consideration if applying later, after being kicked out.
get kicked out a 2nd time, you can never become a legal citizen.

both sides have had their chances, that's to be sure.
 
Flash
96%?? That is no border patrol at all. I'm sure voters won't be happy with his stupid ass.
"a reduction of $1,458,685,000—or 96.4%."

The Democrat filth want the damn Illegals to flood in so they can get more welfare votes. It worked to turn California from a Conservative Republican leadership Golden State to a Democrat controlled Socialist shithole.

They got the Blacks to vote for them by giving them welfare so now they have to import their welfare queens.

They want to use our Democracy to turn this whole country into a Socialist shithole so they can use the government to rob and steal to get their free stuff. They need the Illegals to help them do it.

Kiss America good bye.

It is just as much our fault for allowing it to happen as it is the fault of the Libtards for doing it. Our Founding Fathers gave us the tools to stop shit like this but we are to cowardly to do the right thing.
 
That's
Looks like our ole pal doesn't really believe in infrastructure, does he?

Why would anybody be so dumb as to cut border security at a time when thousands of Illegals are flooding across the border every day?

Dat boy ain't quite right in the head, is he?


Biden Wants to Cut Funding for ‘Border Security Assets and Infrastructure’ by 96%


Terence Jeffrey / @TerryJeffrey / August 04, 2021

President Joe Biden has now revealed there is at least one area in which he is a fiscal conservative: When it comes to providing the infrastructure needed to secure the border, he wants to spend far less than the government currently spends.


His administration has presented Congress with a Department of Homeland Security budget proposal that calls for slashing spending on what it calls “Border Security Assets and Infrastructure” by 96%.


In fiscal year 2021, Congress approved $1,513,000,000 in funding for border security assets and infrastructure. Biden is now asking that Congress approve just $54,315,000 for fiscal year 2022. That is a reduction of $1,458,685,000—or 96.4%.
Because he's not paying his contractor buddies for a wall-like boondoggle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top