Biden Tells Tulsa Crowd Today The Biggest Threat Is White Supremacists....I Thought Global Warming Was

Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
 
Racial Equity = Payouts To Blacks = Reparations For Being Dark Skinned = Systemic Racism.

They won't show this yet (as an excerpt) on Youtube where he told people in Tulsa today about how white people are a huge threat to black folks....but we can look back at his SOTU address where he says it:



The only reason this guy is doing this today is because they're trying to kick every white person they don't like (Trump Supporters) out of every part of American life.

The fact is.....the primary threat of systemic-racism in America today is CRT and Democrats calling for attacks against White Supremacists.
So-called White Supremacists aren't a threat at all. As a matter of fact the only proof they think they can point to is Jan 6th. No other threat exists.

Did he not just incite violence with his ignorant Tulsa speech. Yet we are told ad nauseam that Trump incited violence on January 6th.
 
Racial Equity = Payouts To Blacks = Reparations For Being Dark Skinned = Systemic Racism.

They won't show this yet (as an excerpt) on Youtube where he told people in Tulsa today about how white people are a huge threat to black folks....but we can look back at his SOTU address where he says it:



The only reason this guy is doing this today is because they're trying to kick every white person they don't like (Trump Supporters) out of every part of American life.

The fact is.....the primary threat of systemic-racism in America today is CRT and Democrats calling for attacks against White Supremacists.
So-called White Supremacists aren't a threat at all. As a matter of fact the only proof they think they can point to is Jan 6th. No other threat exists.

Did he not just incite violence with his ignorant Tulsa speech. Yet we are told ad nauseam that Trump incited violence on January 6th.

Biden intentionally incited violence.....and that is exactly why they accused Trump of doing it on Jan 6th......because they planned to do it themselves. Marxism 101.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
In case you haven't noticed, Joe Biden has been a racist for decades. His disingenuous speeches today are written by others to placate black voters. Check out his history. Pay attention to the racist comments and positions he has exhibited.

The Democrats thrive on racial division. They must have there plantation to maintain the stigma of victimization assigned to blacks. Biden is a master at promoting and maintaining divisiveness.

Just as a leopard cannot change its spots, Biden cannot flip a switch to turn off his embedded racism.










Where the problem really gets bad, is that we have the angry black activist, who are brainwashed or chooses to remain ignorant forever it seems..... These activist black's know damned well that Biden is a super race-baiting bullcrapper, but they also know how to work the "white guilt" angle on Biden, and upon the weak white guilt riddled Democrat's in hopes to get the guilty to come groveling to them in the manors that they do, but it's all fake when any of it happens, because their are hardly any today who are suffering under racial oppression or etc.

Both are getting something out of it all though, where as Biden and the white Democrat's are gaining power over the alledged "white conservative" boogeymen, who is deemed by them as their sworn enemy....... The Demoncrats have painted the conservatives as being totally racist, yet for high stakes, and for political purposes....... They do so with a political agenda in a quest for political power in which is given them through race baiter mechanisms, and by way of race baiter hustler tactics that are then worked in unison on the poor ignorant voters.

Are certain activist black's complicit on Biden, and does it make them corrupt if they go along with what they know isn't right or rather maybe is to be found wrong in these current politic's of today, and in the ways that they are being used ??

Some black activist somewhere makes a statement and the right is all up in arms. Meanwhile, Tulsa is remembering the massacre of blacks and black-owned businesses and properties and the right's response? Silence or equivalency or outright denial that the massacre ever happened.

And for your claim that conservatives are being painted as racists? Well, if your side keeps wanting to make voting for blacks harder, wants to hold onto Confederate statues and flags...that would be some of the reasons. As long as your side cannot see that, you will continually be tarred by the racist brush.

...says a guy on the side of the party that insists black people aren't smart enough or good enough to succeed on their own without the help of white Democrats.

Yep, ole Joe is playing this race baiting crap on the white's in this country big time, and sadly the reason the black's go along with it like they've been doing, is because they figure that if he can get it where it's no hassle what so ever to do, then they'll go along with it because they want their agenda to be fulfilled at all cost. It's just usery going on from both involved. We the citizen's are the one's getting screwed over or by it all.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
Do read what you post? The reality is it wasn’t a large number of people dip shit.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Yes.....the pattern appears to be that you have a ring in your nose that the left pulls and you are being jerked around and told what to be offended by.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
Okay.....should we start a war over this or should we go after the living family members of the perpetrators?
Or do you want to act like an idiot and try to punish everyone with white skin?
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
Do read what you post? The reality is it wasn’t a large number of people dip shit.
LOL. I do read what I post. Show me where any of the definitions define the number of people. No wonder you are a trumptard.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Yes.....the pattern appears to be that you have a ring in your nose that the left pulls and you are being jerked around and told what to be offended by.
Coming from a trumptard...LOL. The group that bought into the lie from the orange grifter. Thanks for your input.
 
LOL... White people haven't rioted and burned down businesses in 100 years. BLM and antifa, less than a year ago. But the white man is a threat.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
Do read what you post? The reality is it wasn’t a large number of people dip shit.
LOL. I do read what I post. Show me where any of the definitions define the number of people. No wonder you are a trumptard.

Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Yes.....the pattern appears to be that you have a ring in your nose that the left pulls and you are being jerked around and told what to be offended by.
Coming from a trumptard...LOL. The group that bought into the lie from the orange grifter. Thanks for your input.
Now I’m a trumptard. Yesterday I was a Biden lover. You don’t know me yet you make really dumb conclusions about me.
 
LOL... White people haven't rioted and burned down businesses in 100 years. BLM and antifa, less than a year ago. But the white man is a threat.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
They can't point out anything whites have done (except their false-flag operation on Jan 6th) lately....so they go back 100yrs to dredge up a sin and try to make it into a current issue.
 
LOL... White people haven't rioted and burned down businesses in 100 years. BLM and antifa, less than a year ago. But the white man is a threat.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
They can't point out anything whites have done (except their false-flag operation on Jan 6th) lately....so they go back 100yrs to dredge up a sin and try to make it into a current issue.

There's something completely out of line about all this. It's like the blacks are perpetuating a huge lie about something. The government and the media is just going along with it. Is it to keep businesses from getting destroyed?
 
LOL... White people haven't rioted and burned down businesses in 100 years. BLM and antifa, less than a year ago. But the white man is a threat.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
They can't point out anything whites have done (except their false-flag operation on Jan 6th) lately....so they go back 100yrs to dredge up a sin and try to make it into a current issue.

There's something completely out of line about all this. It's like the blacks are perpetuating a huge lie about something. The government and the media is just going along with it. Is it to keep businesses from getting destroyed?
They're just setting up predicates to accuse us of moral turpitude so they can take our shit. Anyone who argues against their shams can have their property confiscated when the time comes.
 
Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Initial reports were around 30 dead with about a third of that being whites murdered. If that’s a massacre in your world, you likely think January 6th was an insurrection.

Actually, moron - that is the definition of "massacre". It is not my world but the world definition. Next time, try to educate yourself before posting. Will help you look less of a fool.

To help you get started...I put together definitions from a few sources. You're welcome.

You will notice that - other than the fact that the number of victims should be more than one - no definitive number is stated.

Definition of massacre

the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty
-----
the unnecessary, indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals, as in barbarous warfare or persecution or for revenge or plunder.
-----
noun
the killing of a large number of people especially in a cruel way
------
massacre
the killing of a large number of people, esp. people who are not involved in any fighting or have no way of defending themselves
-----
A massacre is the killing of multiple individuals and is usually considered to be morally unacceptable, especially when perpetrated by a group of political actors against defenseless victims.
Do read what you post? The reality is it wasn’t a large number of people dip shit.
LOL. I do read what I post. Show me where any of the definitions define the number of people. No wonder you are a trumptard.

Not sure why that statement should bother you. Unless you are part of the group that does do harm to black people.

If that is the case...yes, we are coming for you.
It's pretty eye-opening how many white supremacists are self-identifying these last few days.
Are you using the real definition of "white supremacist", or are you using the progressive one -- "anyone who disagrees with Democrats"?
If you need to ask the definition of a white supremacist...that's your problem right there.

Glad we sorted that out. Let us know if you need help with other things - like defining what constitutes lying, cheating, etc.
Nope. What's your definition? Or are you using the progressive one?

Because leftists like to redefine words to suit their agenda, reality be damned.
Calling the events in Tulsa 100 years ago a massacre, is like saying the events at the Capitol on January 6th was an insurrection.

There’s a pattern here.
Denying that what happened in Tulsa was a massacre is like denying that Trump lost the election.

There's a pattern here.
Yes.....the pattern appears to be that you have a ring in your nose that the left pulls and you are being jerked around and told what to be offended by.
Coming from a trumptard...LOL. The group that bought into the lie from the orange grifter. Thanks for your input.
Now I’m a trumptard. Yesterday I was a Biden lover. You don’t know me yet you make really dumb conclusions about me.
I would never mistake you for a Biden lover. But regardless of labels - you are basically a moron. Something you have demonstrated over and over. Let me know if you are still confused.
 
We're going to have another Van Jones "whitelash" in the mid terms lol.
 

Forum List

Back
Top