Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
Our Tenth Amendment applies. States are free to challenge that ruling and ask the Court, why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means.How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time.
You can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
Our Tenth Amendment applies. States are free to challenge that ruling and ask the Court, why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means.How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time.
States are free to challenge that ruling and ask the Court, why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means.Our Tenth Amendment applies. States are free to challenge that ruling and ask the Court, why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means.How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time.
They can. The court isn't going to rule otherwise for many years if then.
Well, this could get interesting...
Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures
WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn̵…nypost.com
View attachment 478215
Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
States are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Just as I said you do not know what you quote meansStates are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Dude, you have nothing but appeals to ignorance and claiming that of me.Just as I said you do not know what you quote meansStates are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Do you believe George Mason would agree with you that a state can have restrictive gun laws?
Interesting you believe a state can suspend the 13th Amendment since the states have a tenth amendment right to do so?
BUT DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS? EXPLAIN IT TO MEDude, you have nothing but appeals to ignorance and claiming that of me.Just as I said you do not know what you quote meansStates are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Do you believe George Mason would agree with you that a state can have restrictive gun laws?
Interesting you believe a state can suspend the 13th Amendment since the states have a tenth amendment right to do so?
The whole and entire People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People are declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
There are limits on any and all rights.all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absoluteWhile true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.
I've done it countless timesThere are limits on any and all rights.all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absoluteWhile true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.
For example, the second amendment only applies to public property. You do not have the right to bring weapons onto private property without permission from the owner.
You explain it to Me. I am not the one appealing to ignorance, straw man fallacies or ad hominems. Ask (relevant) questions on where you don't understand the concept.BUT DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS? EXPLAIN IT TO MEDude, you have nothing but appeals to ignorance and claiming that of me.Just as I said you do not know what you quote meansStates are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Do you believe George Mason would agree with you that a state can have restrictive gun laws?
Interesting you believe a state can suspend the 13th Amendment since the states have a tenth amendment right to do so?
The whole and entire People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People are declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
Our Second Amendment absolutely states it is a well regulated militia that is Necessary to the security of a free State.I've done it countless timesThere are limits on any and all rights.all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absoluteWhile true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.
For example, the second amendment only applies to public property. You do not have the right to bring weapons onto private property without permission from the owner.
When your concealed carry no one should see your firearm.
But to address your query I have every right to enter
since jo believe rights are not absolute he could start and demand we have a state run religion
no you're the one that keeps repeating the cut and paste postYou explain it to Me. I am not the one appealing to ignorance, straw man fallacies or ad hominems. Ask (relevant) questions on where you don't understand the concept.BUT DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS? EXPLAIN IT TO MEDude, you have nothing but appeals to ignorance and claiming that of me.Just as I said you do not know what you quote meansStates are welcome to challenge that ruling whenever it is convenient. Our Tenth Amendment is more supreme than any judiciary who cannot explain why they ignored the rules of construction and sacrificed the end to the means. Any legal error can be easily challenged.How do the words of George Mason support your position when you disliked pknopp post?Mason's quote supports my argument more than yours. Do You understand Mason's quote?Dude, you act as if all your post are forgotten from other threads they don't go awayYou can't or you would present actual valid arguments for rebuttal instead of nonsequiturs which are usually considered fallacies.you keep repeating this same stuff and I ask you "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN?"How did I lose? Simply because a false witness bearing right-winger says so. You need valid arguments not merely gossip, hearsay, or soothsay.evidently, you don't and stop acting as if you've have lost this argument many timesI know how to read.lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
3....2.....1....
DODGE AWAY
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
lol so you believe only the government should have access to firearms?
FYI why doesn't that militia you keep referencing allowed to keep their weapons on them and at their homes?
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
You say don't regulate guns regulate gun lovers
You don't like the unorganized militia you believe the only militia is the national guard
You believe the only group that should have access to firearms is the government
So tell me do you know the meaning of George Mason's words?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You notice it does not claim the unorganized militia is necessary to the security of a free State.
"It's really irrelevant. The Supreme Court ruled the 2nd applied to the people and that's unlikely to change for a long time."
pknopp and I have gone toe to toe a few times but he seems to understand what George Mason was saying you on the other hand not so much.
Do you believe George Mason would agree with you that a state can have restrictive gun laws?
Interesting you believe a state can suspend the 13th Amendment since the states have a tenth amendment right to do so?
The whole and entire People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia of the whole and entire People are declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
