danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #301
How did you reach your conclusion? That concept is covered by our federal and some State Constitutions. You merely appeal to ignorance as is typical of the right-wing.Not bright enough to figure it out? Typical of the Right-Wing.what in the fuck is wellness of regulation?Appeals to Ignorance are considered fallacies. Wellness of Regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the militia of the United States.well regulated in the 18th century does not mean to regulateNo, it doesn't. Right-Wingers simply appeal to ignorance of the law yet allege to be against illegals.well regulated in the 18th century wasYes, it does. Right-Wingers simply appeal to ignorance of express law.if you read it and understood it you would know well regulated does not mean when the second amendment was written what it means today.The Second Amendment is absolute: "shall not be infringed" leaves no room for interpretation or weakening.The second amendment is cut and dry and to the point
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------what does shall not be infringed mean to you?
I read that awkwardly written 2nd Amendment and always stop at the phrase "well regulated".
That seems to supersede the 'not be infringed" part.
IMHO
in working order as to be expected
old people use to say their body was well regulated
Wellness of regulation does not at all imply restrictions but the opposite, to prevent any and all restrictions.
Well regulated means fully functional and free flowing, such as in regular digestion or regular interstate commerce.
The obvious intent of the 2nd amendment was to deny any and all federal jurisdiction over firearms, in any way.