Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Doesn't say that. Try again.Are they?
The constitution is worded "The president can issue a pardon to anybody who has been CONVICTED..."
I don't recall fauci or liz cheney being convicted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't say that. Try again.Are they?
The constitution is worded "The president can issue a pardon to anybody who has been CONVICTED..."
I don't recall fauci or liz cheney being convicted.
Where does it say that in the Constitution?If there was no crime committed, there is nothing to be PARDONED for. The simple act of accepting a pardon is an ADMISSION OF GUILT.
You know that. I know that. Most people know that. Biden doesn't know that.Trump wasn't going to waste his time trying to prosecute political enemies so these pardons were not necessary.
I agree. He does intend, however, to prosecute lawbreakers.Trump wasn't going to waste his time trying to prosecute political enemies so these pardons were not necessary.
Why would you need to be pardoned if you didn't commit a crime to be pardoned for? Now run along with your off topic attempt to derail, troll.Where does it say that in the Constitution?
Could answer the question is which was directly on topic. Nice attempt at deflection.Why would you need to be pardoned if you didn't commit a crime to be pardoned for? Now run along with your off topic attempt to derail, troll.
Please point to anything in the topic that remotely mentions the constitutionality of the pardons. It is without question a constitutional act. That does not change the definition of the word PARDON. To be pardoned, there, logically and obviously must be something to be pardoned for. To deny this fact is to be a moronic troll and you fit the description perfectly.Could answer the question is which was directly on topic. Nice attempt at deflection.
Now, where does it say that in the Constitution? Put up, or shut up, as the old saying goes.,
What if the pardon is intended to prevent political prosecutions by Trump's administration? That falls directly under the intent of the Founding Fathers when they wrote the Constitution. Did you consider that possibility, because that is exactly what it is. Biden was covering their ass to prevent Trump from doing exactly what he did! Agree?Please point to anything in the topic that remotely mentions the constitutionality of the pardons. It is without question a constitutional act. That does not change the definition of the word PARDON. To be pardoned, there, logically and obviously must be something to be pardoned for. To deny this fact is to be a moronic troll and you fit the description perfectly.
Were there other presidents who preemptively pardoned people?
Seems strange to me.
But interestingly, the Idiot-in-Chief forgot to pardon himself.Were there other presidents who preemptively pardoned people?
Seems strange to me.
Were there other presidents who preemptively pardoned people?
Seems strange to me.
Now that's funny coming from a boot licking coon who will get on her knees or back in a heartbeat for a white man or woman for that matter.Wow you have to be some sort of plantation boy to make a post like that
Says the ass clown celebrating a convicted felon taking over the White House.The emotive response of dumb fucks everywhere.
There is nothing funny about your blind loyalty to the demklanNow that's funny coming from a boot licking coon who will get on her knees or back in a heartbeat for a white man or woman for that matter.
Smfh, still boot licking in 2025.There is nothing funny about your blind loyalty to the demklan
Is that you motto? SadSmfh, still boot licking in 2025.