Biden is giving the 2nd highest civilian award to the leaders of the Jan. 6 congressional committee

[AntonToo]

You mean besides the text messages and the changed testimony that was lies?? Haha

Again you don't understand the difference between what you fantasize was true and well supported facts.

There is no serious evidence Cassidy lied to congress.

 

[struth]

Again you don't understand the difference between what you fantasize was true and well supported facts.

There is no serious evidence Cassidy lied to congress and when you say there is you are just posting your fantasy, not fact.

what is the difference between "serious evidence" and evidence? Because there is evidence she lied, and there is evidence she changed her testimony, and she did so after Liz contacted her

 

[Jroc]

Because some Trumptard Republicans say so? Same ones that couldn't bother make a criminal complaint about it?

You are posting reaching garbage...understand?

No investigation because of collaborators in the cover-up say so? because you say so? please...... What happened to the January 6th bomber ? there was a pipe on planted at the DNC headquarters and Kamala Harrison's was there what happened to that? She lied about even being there she said she was at the capital but she wasn't... People like you are pathetic. You have no problem with sending SWAT teams and armored vehicles to go after people with misdemeanor charges.. you're a brainless joke

 

[Jroc]

Again you don't understand the difference between what you fantasize was true and well supported facts.

There is no serious evidence Cassidy lied to congress.

So you actually believe Donald Trump attacked secret service ages grab the wheel of the limo ...idiot

 

[AntonToo]

what is the difference between "serious evidence" and evidence? Because there is evidence she lied, and there is evidence she changed her testimony, and she did so after Liz contacted her

Wrong again, there is no serious evidence she lied.

At most the driver, who DID NOT actually testify to congress was refuting that Trump was screaming and grabbed the wheel....THATS IT, because otherwise he is saying that Trump DID want to join the MAGA crowd at Capitol and that he was irate that the security denied him. Does that prove that Cassidy lied about what she heard about the scuffle in the car? Nope

Historic record is that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with the MAGA crowd - NO ONE refutes that.

 

[struth]

Wrong again, there is no serious evidence she lied.

At most the driver, who DID NOT actually testify to congress was refuting that Trump was screaming and grabbed the wheel....THATS IT, because otherwise he saying that Trump DID want to join the MAGA crowd at Capitol and that he was irate that the security denied him.

Historic record is that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with the MAGA crowd - NO ONE refutes that.

Again, what is "serious evidence" v evidence?

Maybe you should know what the evidence is to begin with, because Trump's driver did testify

Trump's driver contradicts Cassidy Hutchinson about Jan. 6 SUV altercation, GOP report says

Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony about Trump's actions on Jan. 6 was contradicted, in part, by Trump's driver, a new report from a Republican-led House committee claims

abcnews.go.com

But the new 81-page report from the House Administration Committee's subcommittee on oversight, which is examining both the previous committee's investigation and what happened on Jan. 6, calls Hutchinson's account into question.

The new report cites testimony that was given by four other Trump White House employees to the previous Jan. 6 committee and the account of Trump's Secret Service driver when the purported altercation took place.

.....According to the new report, the driver, who is not named, was interviewed by the previous Jan. 6 committee in November 2022 and "testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson."

 

[AntonToo]

Again, what is "serious evidence" v evidence?

Maybe you should know what the evidence is to begin with, because Trump's driver did testify

Trump's driver contradicts Cassidy Hutchinson about Jan. 6 SUV altercation, GOP report says

Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony about Trump's actions on Jan. 6 was contradicted, in part, by Trump's driver, a new report from a Republican-led House committee claims

abcnews.go.com

But the new 81-page report from the House Administration Committee's subcommittee on oversight, which is examining both the previous committee's investigation and what happened on Jan. 6, calls Hutchinson's account into question.

The new report cites testimony that was given by four other Trump White House employees to the previous Jan. 6 committee and the account of Trump's Secret Service driver when the purported altercation took place.

.....According to the new report, the driver, who is not named, was interviewed by the previous Jan. 6 committee in November 2022 and "testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson."

Driver confirmed that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with his MAGA crowd and that he was irritated that the security refused him.

True or false?

 

[struth]

Driver confirmed that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with his MAGA crowd and that he was irritated that the security refused him.

True or false?

what does that have to do with the lie that he grabbed the steering wheel?

 

[Jroc]

Wrong again, there is no serious evidence she lied.

At most the driver, who DID NOT actually testify to congress was refuting that Trump was screaming and grabbed the wheel....THATS IT, because otherwise he is saying that Trump DID want to join the MAGA crowd at Capitol and that he was irate that the security denied him. Does that mean that Cassidy lied about what she heard about the scuffle in the car? Nope

Historic record is that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with the MAGA crowd - NO ONE refutes that.

You actually believe this stuff...what an idiot people with TDS are delusional

 

[AntonToo]

what does that have to do with the lie that he grabbed the steering wheel?

It has to do with the HISTORIC RELAVANCE dummy.

It doesn't matter if Trump grabbed or didn't grab the wheel - the only thing that matters was that Trump was very intent on joining the MAGA crowd at the Capitol and the only reason he didn't was that his security refused.

Both Cassidy and driver's statements well established that fact.

 

[Jroc]

Driver confirmed that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with his MAGA crowd and that he was irritated that the security refused him.

True or false?

Yeah he grabbed the wheel and tried to choke out one secret service agent while steering with the other hand

 

[AntonToo]

Yeah he grabbed the wheel and tried to choke out one secret service agent while steering with the other hand

Thats right you can't answer straight because you don't like the answer, so you deflect.

Pretty pathetic, but this is how conversation with rightwingers typically goes.

 

[struth]

It has to do with the HISTORIC RELAVANCE dummy.

It doesn't matter if Trump grabbed or didn't grab the wheel - the only thing that matters was that Trump was very intent on joining the MAGA crowd at the Capitol and the only reason he didn't was that his security refused.

Both Cassidy and driver's statements well established that fact.

historic relavence to what?

The question is why did she change her testimony and lie? Of course it matters, she said that's what she was told happened, she was the commttee's star witness that changed her testimony, and was put on the spot light, even when everyone refuted what she said.

no Cassidy lied, literally the link shows that everyone contridicted her story that Liz had her say

 

[AntonToo]

historic relavence to what?

The question is why did she change her testimony and lie? Of course it matters, she said that's what she was told happened, she was the commttee's star witness that changed her testimony, and was put on the spot light, even when everyone refuted what she said.

no Cassidy lied, literally the link shows that everyone contridicted her story that Liz had her say

Historic relavance to the events of January 6th 2021 dummy.

No one will give any shit 100 years from now if Trump grabbed the wheel or not - what they will read in history books about J6 2021 was that Trump refused election results, was intent on halting Congressional certification of that election and overturning the result.

Trump sent his crowds to the Capitol, instructing them to pressure Congressmen and was intent on joining them there. That is the fundamental significance of Casidy's testimony and it's well supported by others even if they disagree on exact details of how Trump expressed his frustrations.

 

[struth]

Historic relavance to the events of January 6th 2021 dummy.

No one will give any shit 100 years from now if Trump grabbed the wheel or not - what they will read in history books about J6 2021 was that Trump refused election results, was intent on halting Congressional certification of that election and overturning the result.

Trump sent his crowds to the Capitol, instructing them to pressure Congressmen and was intent on joining them there. That is the fundamental significance of Casidy's testimony and it's well supported by others even if they disagree on exact details of how Trump expressed his frustrations.

Where he wanted to go to the protest or not isn’t relevant to the witness tampering and the prejury.

 

[AntonToo]

Where he wanted to go to the protest or not isn’t relevant to the witness tampering and the prejury.

It's entirely relavant to the HISTORY. Do you understand the concept or not?

Have your reaching fantasies about witness tampering and etc. in a few years you'll again have blue balls about it and everyone else will forget about it.

What will be left in the long term are the historic findings of the J6 committee none of you rightwingers can ever refute.

 

[struth]

It's entirely relavant to the HISTORY. Do you understand the concept or not?

Have your reaching fantasies about witness tampering and etc. in a few years you'll again have blue balls about it and everyone else will forget about it.

What will be left in the long term are the historic findings of the J6 committee none of you rightwingers can ever refute.

Nobody cares if he wanted to go to the protest or not.

What history will show now, is that the Demafacsit tampered with witnesses, abused their offices, to go after a political rival of the President and try to keep him from running for office

 

[Jroc]

Historic relavance to the events of January 6th 2021 dummy.

No one will give any shit 100 years from now if Trump grabbed the wheel or not - what they will read in history books about J6 2021 was that Trump refused election results, was intent on halting Congressional certification of that election and overturning the result.

Trump sent his crowds to the Capitol, instructing them to pressure Congressmen and was intent on joining them there. That is the fundamental significance of Casidy's testimony and it's well supported by others even if they disagree on exact details of how Trump expressed his frustrations.

People with TDS are pathetic right Trump had a strategy session with all those people in order to go storm the Capitol building in an attempted overthrow of the government the worst attacks since the civil war ....what idiot ....you actually believe that stuff ...... People like you are pathetic. You have a narrative that's fed to you, you question none of it, because you want so bad to believe it. That's why you're so pathetic and that's why Trump won the election in spite of idiots like you

 

[AntonToo]

Nobody cares if he wanted to go to the protest or not.

But you are sure everyone cares that Trump threw a hissy fit in the limo?

How very selective of you.

 

[AntonToo]

People with TDS are pathetic right Trump had a strategy session with all those people in order to go storm the Capitol building