Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Of 59,000 Asylum seekers returned to Mexico, only 11 were granted asylum. Mexico knew they were cheated and stopped playing along.
Maybe Mexico should seal their southern border?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of 59,000 Asylum seekers returned to Mexico, only 11 were granted asylum. Mexico knew they were cheated and stopped playing along.
not sure who this we is but I never agreed with it,,
now you people on the left might have agreed its OK to murder or molest children and anyone else that might get in the way of your disgusting lust for blood or pleasure,,
but we sure didnt,,
We don't have gun control.We have gun control, why is there still murder?
no I dont think you should be allowed to have a gun because you want to see more dead children laying in a pool of their own blood,,No, you all decided that crazy people could have as many military grade weapons as they wanted, and they proceeded to moe down children.
Good work.
We don't have gun control.
And that is probably the percentage of the twelve million Biden invited in over the last three years who will qualify for asylum.Except Mexico did nothing of the sort. They were stuck with 59,000 Asylum Seekers, many of whom were victimized by the cartels and others, and Trump screwed them by not processing their cases like he promised.
Of 59,000 Asylum seekers returned to Mexico, only 11 were granted asylum. Mexico knew they were cheated and stopped playing along.
What Mexico did was enforce their southern border so no one could enter Mexico.Except Mexico did nothing of the sort. They were stuck with 59,000 Asylum Seekers, many of whom were victimized by the cartels and others, and Trump screwed them by not processing their cases like he promised.
Of 59,000 Asylum seekers returned to Mexico, only 11 were granted asylum. Mexico knew they were cheated and stopped playing along.
We had a handgun ban in Chicago.
Did it work?
it worked fine, until the NRA got it overturned in SCOTUS 14 years ago, then our murder rate skyrocketed.
How did it "work fine"?
then our murder rate skyrocketed.
It must have been a shock after decades of zero-gun murders.
Yes, a normal homicide rate for a regular US City is doing just fine, and that's where we were at before the McDonald Decision unleashed the gun industry flooding our streets with guns.you just said it worked fine you stupid ****,,
it would be nice if Illinois had gun stores to sell to law abiding people so its not just criminals that have guns,,Yes, a normal homicide rate for a regular US City is doing just fine, and that's where we were at before the McDonald Decision unleashed the gun industry flooding our streets with guns.
It would be nicer if you didn't have gun stores in Indiana selling to every gang-banger who walks through the door.
We do.it would be nice if Illinois had gun stores to sell to law abiding people so its not just criminals that have guns,,
so you have a rash of family members killing each other over donuts,,We do.
Of course, "law-Abiding" people are half the problem, because you have them shooting their family members as part of stupid arguments over who took the last donut.
Yes, a normal homicide rate for a regular US City is doing just fine, and that's where we were at before the McDonald Decision unleashed the gun industry flooding our streets with guns.
It would be nicer if you didn't have gun stores in Indiana selling to every gang-banger who walks through the door.
But the point is (and I know you are dense) is that those people would have been considered "Law Abiding" citizens up until they point they shot their brother-in-law over the donut.so you have a rash of family members killing each other over donuts,,
sounds like the problem is the people not the guns,,
not sure if you know this but thats not legal,,
so how many gun stores are there in chicago??
they were law abiding right up until they committed a crime,,But the point is (and I know you are dense) is that those people would have been considered "Law Abiding" citizens up until they point they shot their brother-in-law over the donut.
Just like Adam Lanza, Joker Holmes, and a host of other mass shooters would be considered "Law-Abiding" up until the day they flipped out.
Heck, even Thomas Crooks was "Law Abiding" until the day he took a shot at Trump.
Exactly my point. Which is why we need to have strict rules on who can get a gun.they were law abiding right up until they committed a crime,,
Well-regulated militias. The constitution is fine as is.when you come up with a way to know who will commit a crime in the future and get the constitution changed to reflect that we can talk,,
until then the only real solution is to make criminals afraid by killing them when they commit crimes,,
just so we all know,,
how many people killed a family member because of a donut??
wsvn.com
as I said,,Exactly my point. Which is why we need to have strict rules on who can get a gun.
Well-regulated militias. The constitution is fine as is.
No, you actually keep people who have no business owning guns from getting them.
![]()
BSO: Dunkin’ Donuts employee shot his father during drive-thru shooting in Lauderdale Lakes - WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale
LAUDERDALE LAKES, FLA. (WSVN) - New details have been released in the shooting at a Dunkin Donuts on Monday that left one person injured. Broward<a class="excerpt-read-more"...wsvn.com
![]()
Deadly shooting started with fight over doughnuts
Bond set at $200,000, with GPS monitoringwww.wapt.com