Biden Executed

[80zephyr]

Trump believes this crazy shit, remember the white farmers crosses he showed the President of S. Africa? It was in the Congo.

The cult don't care, they believe every word.

He knows his audience, thats for sure.

 

[ColonelAngus]

This is the BEST VERSION OF BIDEN.



Just lying bags of dirt.

If it was the BEST VERSION of Biden, why did he drop out.

JOE SCARBOROUGH LIED. THE ENTIRE PLANET KNOWS IT.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Imagine faking you are a libertarian just so you can lie on a message board. So sad.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You deflected that post by talking about something differently.

He said it:
SAID
“So, I think the judge just ruled against New York Times for their lies about the Russiagate hoax, and that they might have to give back that Pulitzer Prize.”

Yes, and again, that is a true statement. The Judge did rule against the New York times in the case of them lying about the Russiagate hoax. Here is the link (again):

Trump's defamation case to revoke NYT, WaPo Pulitzers can proceed, court rules

The president celebrated a Florida appellate court's decision to allow his defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board to proceed.

san.com

Just out of curiosity, you DO know that the NYT DID lie about the Russiagate hoax, correct?

AND that Joe Scarborough lied about Biden in the above post?

 

[Marener]

Yes, and again, that is a true statement. The Judge did rule against the New York times in the case of them lying about the Russiagate hoax. Here is the link (again):

Trump's defamation case to revoke NYT, WaPo Pulitzers can proceed, court rules

The president celebrated a Florida appellate court's decision to allow his defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board to proceed.

san.com

Just out of curiosity, you DO know that the NYT DID lie about the Russiagate hoax, correct?

AND that Joe Scarborough lied about Biden in the above post?

Ruling that a case can proceed does not mean that The NY Times lied. There is no verdict. Musk lied.

If you can provide the exact place where The NY Times lied, we can discuss it. I won’t speak in vague generalities.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Ruling that a case can proceed does not mean that The NY Times lied. There is no verdict. Musk lied.

He didn't say that the Judge said the NYT lied. He said that the judge ruled against it, which they did.

If you can provide the exact place where The NY Times lied, we can discuss it. I won’t speak in vague generalities.

Here are two to start with, though one is not about Russia Gate, but about the much lied about January 6th riot.

April was the month the narratives died.

On April 15, the Biden administration acknowledged there was no evidence that Russia ever offered bounties on American troops in Afghanistan, walking back a report that wounded former President Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election.

Four days later, the Washington, DC, medical examiner revealed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick had not been murdered by rampaging Trump supporters during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, as reports had claimed, but had died of natural causes.

Both stories were based on anonymous, unidentifiable sources, but had become deeply enmeshed in the public consciousness. Both confirmed the assumptions of the nation’s left-leaning media and academic elite, while damaging their political enemies.

How the New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative

A new book reveals how The New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative — from Hitler to Trump.

nypost.com

If you do not like reading, here's a video about the many lies that NYT actually admits to.

 

[Marener]

He didn't say that the Judge said the NYT lied. He said that the judge ruled against it, which they did.

Here are two to start with, though one is not about Russia Gate, but about the much lied about January 6th riot.

April was the month the narratives died.

On April 15, the Biden administration acknowledged there was no evidence that Russia ever offered bounties on American troops in Afghanistan, walking back a report that wounded former President Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election.

Four days later, the Washington, DC, medical examiner revealed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick had not been murdered by rampaging Trump supporters during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, as reports had claimed, but had died of natural causes.

Both stories were based on anonymous, unidentifiable sources, but had become deeply enmeshed in the public consciousness. Both confirmed the assumptions of the nation’s left-leaning media and academic elite, while damaging their political enemies.

How the New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative

A new book reveals how The New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative — from Hitler to Trump.

nypost.com

If you do not like reading, here's a video about the many lies that NYT actually admits to.

“the judge just ruled against New York Times for their lies about the Russiagate hoax”

He said “for their lies” which matters.

None of those stories are part of Russiagate or had anything to do with the Pulitzer Prize.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

In 2020 and has been replaced with a robot.
Ummm not really but that’s what an insane post that Trump retweeted claimed.

I bring this up to illustrate how crazy our President is.

This is pure QKrew Krazy. And the craziest part of it ? Apparently the “robot” chosen mimicked an aging dementia patient at highly critical moments.

Donald Trump shares baseless conspiracy that Biden was 'executed in 2020'

Trump shared a Truth Social post claiming that the former president had been replaced with "robotic engineered soulless mindless entities."

www.newsweek.com

Crazy Billionaire non politician President sits behind
The
Biden/Obama desk, today...



Biden executed,
But he was never shot.

Move on.

Otherwise,
you sound
as if you're preaching climate change.

 

[Seymour Flops]

“the judge just ruled against New York Times for their lies about the Russiagate hoax”

He said “for their lies” which matters.

Really?

That's what your hanging your hat on? The case is for their lies, which is what Musk clearly meant, even if you are suddenly able to parse his sentence to make it into "a lie." He forgot to say "in the case" before he said "for their lies."

That matters?

Let's see, we have a newspaper that lies so much that only the willfully gullible pay attention to it, and on the other side, we have a man who has spent the last four months finding and ending an incredibly amout of fraud waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars.

We have one gramatical nit-pick against the newpaper that pushed every phony narrative that could be used to create stories about Trump's dishonesty.

None of those stories are part of Russiagate or had anything to do with the Pulitzer Prize.

The Russian bounty on U.S. soldiers fake story was part of the "Trump is buddies with Putin" fake narrative. But now it has to be specifically the Puke-litzer prize winning story?

Okay . . .

In a series of 10 articles, Times reporters propagated a narrative detailing fictitious connections between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, the president’s transition team, and the administration.

The Mueller investigation as well as the Senate Intelligence Committee affirmed that there is no evidence that President Trump or his staff conspired with the Russian government to impact the 2016 election. Special Counsel John Durham is now indicting some of those who were involved in creating what amounted to a political hoax that dogged the Trump administration for years.

Despite these findings, and the inaccuracies in the Times’ articles, the Pulitzer Prize board has not repealed the award. (Note that all principals are alive and perfectly capable of responding.)

Will New York Times, Washington Post Return Pulitzer for Misleading Russia Collusion Stories?

In 2018, journalists from The New York Times and The Washington Post won a Pulitzer Prize in national reporting for their biased and inaccurate coverage of Russia’s alleged collaboration with the Trump campaign to interfere with the 2016 election, a claim we now know was a hoax. So when are they...

www.heritage.org

A Pulitzer-prize winning report by The New York Times that includes allegations of Russian meddling in US elections has been torn apart by the John Durham investigation.

The probe by the special counsel contains fresh embarrassment for The Gray Lady and Washington Post, both of which won Pulitzers for their reporting on the saga.

And left-leaning networks and newspapers which lapped up the fabricated stories linking Trump to the Kremlin and the salacious Steele dossier are now facing renewed fury.

Durham highlights a Times report from December 2017, which claimed that in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump, 'made a startling revelation' to Australia's top diplomat in Britain.

Namely: 'Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton' and 'Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs Clinton'.
Yet the Australian diplomat in question - Alexander Downer - told the Durham probe that 'Papadopoulos made no mention of Clinton emails, dirt or any specific approach by the Russian government to the Trump campaign'.

In fact, Durham found the Papadopoulos information was so not 'startling' that agents immediately dismissed it.

But The NYT report was critical in triggering the FBI probe into Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia, which the Durham report has now found should never have been launched.

It has fueled calls for the Pulitzers to be returned, after the board who issues the prizes rejected calls for them to be rescinded last year.

New York Times and Washington Post Pulitzer-winning stories unravel

A Pulitzer-prize winning report by The New York Times that includes allegations of Russian meddling in US elections has been torn apart by the John Durham (inset) investigation.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Doc7505]

~~~~~~

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I don't generally address you people because you're fucking retarded and there's really no point because you're too retarded to understand things at even a first grade level, but I'll make a quick exception. The second picture is a different angle and his hair is longer.

Have a nice day, Inspector Clouseau.

Another camera angle gave him the Ball chinian look?

 

[BULLDOG]

A Biden thread title, but TDS rant

TDS? Trump said that Biden died and was replaced by a clone and a robot. You don't think that is batshit crazy?

 

[BULLDOG]

We are not even 6 months into a 4 year term and Trump has already gone full-on batshit crazy.

It only gets worse from here, he is surrounded by sycophants who agree with every bat-shit crazy thing he says and does.

Just like this forum, actually.

Trump was always batshit crazy. It's just more obvious now, if that is possible.

 

[80zephyr]

TDS? Trump said that Biden died and was replaced by a clone and a robot. You don't think that is batshit crazy?

Trump got you to react to it. He is a master troll. Is that crazy?

 

[M14 Shooter]

In 2020 and has been replaced with a robot.
Ummm not really but that’s what an insane post that Trump retweeted claimed.

Trump casts a line and catches... you.

 

[marvin martian]

In 2020 and has been replaced with a robot.
Ummm not really but that’s what an insane post that Trump retweeted claimed.

I bring this up to illustrate how crazy our President is.

This is pure QKrew Krazy. And the craziest part of it ? Apparently the “robot” chosen mimicked an aging dementia patient at highly critical moments.

Donald Trump shares baseless conspiracy that Biden was 'executed in 2020'

Trump shared a Truth Social post claiming that the former president had been replaced with "robotic engineered soulless mindless entities."

www.newsweek.com

Still not as crazy as your belief that men can give birth.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Trump got you to react to it. He is a master troll. Is that crazy?

Biden got everyone to believe he has dementia. The man is a master troll. Is that crazy?

 

[dudmuck]

Trump casts a line and catches... you.